Is it better to eat a bad food, or to eat nothing at all?
your body NEEDS to have carbs(i no thatsounds crazy) i work at the center for teen girls WED(with eating disorders) and i get asked this question alot truthfully it better to have good carbs rather than bad (suchas fruit pomgrante seeds strawberrys) anything rich with antioxidents but do not just drink water and not eat u need to balnce this but dont supersize your mcdonalds meal stick with the small/medium and try to find the best choice
Is it better to eat badly or eat nothing at all?
If, you will consume badly then sure it is extra proper to consume no longer something in any respect. yet, why could you no longer chosen healthful over badly. you will experience sleep and look extra proper. Drink a lot of water. entire Grains and Nuts, Baked no longer fried ingredients. Brown Rice. fat - unfastened Milk. Yogurt. culmination and vegetables, little or no meat. If, you do make it no extra advantageous than a deck of enjoying cards.
Is it better to not eat breakfast, or to eat a breakfast that is moderately high in saturated fats?
The problem with questions like this is how tragically vague they are.I understand your good intentions in asking a question like this, but it has so many built in assumptions that you simply don’t realize.“Better” for what?What does better mean, contextually? Even the word “healthy” can be effectively useless as a qualifier since the word means different things depending on contexts. If you don’t have a spleen, you probably don’t want much fat in your diet, for example. If you’re an epileptic on a ketogenic diet, moderately high in saturated fats might not be good enough.Are you trying to lose weight? Maintain it?It’s hard to really understand how utterly complex such a simple sounding question actually is.Even the word “breakfast” comes with certain baggage. Technically the first meal you eat is breakfast, regardless of when you eat it…many people take it to mean “a meal early in the day” though.I’ll go ahead and make some assumptions.First, saturated fats are not “unhealthy,” so that shouldn’t be a concern.If you’re trying to maintain satiety, it’s far more important to eat a meal that’s >=30% proteins and has a portion of high glycemic index (cup of orange juice, oatmeal with brown sugar, a banana, etc) food. This is important with regards to weight loss because it will keep you satisfied longer and keep you from eating as much throughout the day.Skipping breakfast is associated with obesity because the subjects in various studies tended to overeat on calorie dense foods late at night. Eating at night isn’t the issue, it’s the quantity of food consumed throughout the day. If you are trying to lose weight and you want to “skip breakfast” it’s fine, so long as you make sure you don’t snack. However, studies have shown greater success rates when subjects do eat breakfast, especially as described in the previous paragraph.
Is it really better for your body to not eat meat?
We are certainly able to get almost everything we need from a plant based diet in terms of nutrition but it takes a great deal of work to balance your protein, vitamin B12 and retinol (vitamin A) needs when not consuming meat. It is not better for you not to eat meat unless it is meat that has been processed and has additives added to it to preserve it. These meats have nitrosamines in them which are strongly connected to an increase risk of cancer so we should avoid deli meats.It is better to consume organic and grass fed meat. Organic meat does not have antibiotics in it, an excess of which are becoming a growing problem in the fight against disease. The less we consume meat from animals that have been given antibiotics the better, as antibiotic resistance has become a huge problem in our world. Be aware also that eating beef is greatly adding to the problem of global warming and global poverty. There is not enough time to get into this subject but there are many websites that are very enlightening on this matter. In short, eating meat is not better for you or worse for you as long as you stay away from deli meats and try as much as possible to eat meat from organic and grass fed and or free run animals.
Is it better to eat nothing than eat something bad?
It's better to keep food in your system on a regular basis rather than skip meals. Not only will you experience a drop in metabolism from failing to eat, you'll also become really hungry and you may not be able to control the cravings that ensue - basically, skipping meals will probably cause you to binge on even worse unhealthy food later. Why not trade out your unhealthy snacks for good stuff? It takes about ten minutes (plus refrigerating or baking time) to make your own protein bars with satiating peanut butter and oats, and a batch will last you at least two weeks.
Is it better to skip a meal than to eat bad food?
I usually would eat the bad food... but try to minimize the damage by trying to make the healthiest choices possible and watching how many calories-worth of bad food I'm eating. With fast food it's so incredibly easy to eat too much fat and sodium and calories in general, that one has to be really careful about the dreaded drive-thru. Then when I get back home, I would return to my usual healthy food routine. When done this way, it doesn't seem to derail my weight loss plans much at all, plus I don't feel weak from low blood sugar had I simply skipped the meal.
Is it better to eat unhealthy or not at all?
If it’s a one time thing, it’s not going to make a negative impact to your health to eat that way once, so might as well eat unhealthy if you enjoy it so you won’t deal with being hungry.If it’s an ongoing situation, then still eat unhealthy because you’ll die without any food given enough time.Also If you’re going to do intense physical activity, better to eat to get enough fuel to perform better than to starve.Only exception may be if it’s ongoing but interspersed with regular opportunities to eat healthy such as a healthy breakfast or dinner daily, then consider intermittent fasting, where you skip a meal but eat 2 bigger healthy meals, or 1 very big healthy meal to get your caloric needs.
Is it better to eat lunch and take a nap or nap then and then eat?
When you eat food, your stomach churns to help mix the food with gastric acid and break it down. The top of your stomach is lined with a ring of muscle known as the lower esophageal sphincter. This muscle prevents the contents of your stomach from traveling up into your esophagus. However, when partially digested food presses up against the lower esophageal sphincter, it can relax. When you have a full stomach and lie down, more food can press against the sphincter, allowing the contents of your stomach to re-enter your esophagus.When you don't have food in your stomach you can't take a nap because you will get hungry. So in my opinion go to nap at least 15 min. after your lunch
Is it better to eat before or after exercise?
Unless the running is going to span an hour or more, you don’t really need to eat before or after. The answer depends on the duration and intensity of the run, your level of fitness, and time of day.In general, you will find that the literature will say you should eat after exercise, typically within 30–45 minutes. The reason is to accelerate the bodies recovery.As for eating before exercise, I don’t know if you can say it is either better or worse. I think it comes down to tolerance. It takes the stomach about 3–5 hours to empty its contents into the small intestines. Most people report that eating before exercise feels like a hindrance, especially if the exercise is intense. For me, 2 hours is the cutoff. If the training is going to be 2 hours or less, then I don���t really care or try to schedule any pre-exercise meal or snack (if I am feeling hungry, I might have a banana or something like that). If the exercise is in the afternoon, I will have been eating my regular meals anyway. If the training is early AM, then all I have is water and coffee, then out the door. If the training will last 2 hours or more, then I try to schedule in a meal at least an hour before beginning.All things being equal, eating after exercise is the option with demonstrable benefits. However, if you are going to be out for a long time, then you probably want to eat something prior to beginning.
Is eating McDonald's better than nothing?
Any consumable item is better than starvation, but regardless of which fast food restaurant it is, the healthier option like salads and wraps are more often than not just as unhealthy as a cheeseburger and fries. These companies use processed food. The chicken, burgers and even turkey parties are a combination of the animal at hand and who knows what else. Purchase a pack of freshly shaped, ready to cook burgers from your local supermarket and grill them. This finished product is extremely varies from the grey, soggy thing underneath all of the bread and condiments surrounding the meat of a Big Mac.The grilled chicken (sometimes they offer crispy) in these salads are of the same quality. Moreover, if you read the ingredients on the dressings for the salad, you will find words you can't pronounce, because it's filled with synthetics and sugar! As far as calories go, sure, maybe it's 100 calories less than a Big Mac, but don't forget about the carbs coming from the breadline and croutons and sodium in the cheese garnish and dressing. In the end, you will end up eating something unhealthy for you. So if you're facing starvation or McDonalds, Burger King or Wendy's be sure to get yourself some fries, a Whopper and chicken nuggets instead of their mediocre claim at healthy options. It's all the same.