Is It Even Possible At All That Woman Was Created From Man

Who was created first man or woman?

Here's a story a priest told the congregation at my sister's wedding just before they got to the "I do" 's. THE STORY OF ADAM & EVE: ADAM'S POINT OF VIEW Adam was wandering around in the Garden, and started talking to The Lord. Adam said: "I'm bored, is there anything you can do to help me?" The Lord said: "I'll make a companion for you. She'll cook for you, she'll clean for you, she'll always satisfy you in bed, and she'll never get headaches, and she'll always be pleasing to look at." Adam said: "That sounds great. How much would it cost?" The Lord said: "An arm and a leg" Adam thought for a minute, then said: "so what can I get for a rib?" And after that, the priest told this one: THE STORY OF ADAM AND EVE: FROM EVE'S POINT OF VIEW: Eve was wandering around in The Garden, and the Lord started talking to her. She said "That snake is a wonderful comedian, but I'm getting a little tired of eating apples. Is there anything you can do to help?" The Lord said: "I'll make a companion for you. He'll be stronger, good in the sack, he'll take care of you, but he's going to be stubborn, and you are going to learn what 'macho' means" Eve said: "Sounds like a challenge. What's the catch?" The Lord said: "The catch is, you're going to have to convince him that he was here first" And with that, the priest then started asking for the rings, and asking "do you?" "I do"

How is it possible that God created one man and one woman and human life continued?

If you think you've hit the nail on the head then think again, If it cant happen the Biblical way then how did it happen via evolution..

How can we get different races via evolution if you say we cant get the different races via Creation..

What you're failing to see is that all the natural rules and laws of nature still applies in Creation as they do in evolution, so if you think they don't apply in Creation then they cannot apply in evolution..

Edit: God needs a diaper change: You are basicaly the reason I laugh at answers coming from atheists or science buffs..

You have no basic knowledge that anyone with common sense should have, you talk as if evolution is a fact, it is not a fact, wake up..

You haven't even the ability to realise that you've flawed yourself by your own premise you work from..

The simple truth if your head can grasp it that is is that biology works exactly as it should if Creation is the way but what you and your so called evolution believers don't understand is that in the beginning man was at their healtheist, no flaws..

This is one theing you evolution believers fail to see and cannot see you're blind to common sense..

Even if evolution is true it cannot begin with a population it also begins with one that splits into two becoming the two sexes, no species can begin any other way..

And if you have common sense you'll realise this, use your head for once, you " God needs a diaper change" are clearly brainwashed the sadest kind of hypocrite known to man..

When did God create man and woman?

In the first chapter of Genesis we learn that God created man and woman at the same time in DAY 6.

26: And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27: So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

In Genesis chapter 2, we learn that woman was created after man, from his rib; and Genesis chapter two deals with what happens AFTER DAY 6.

7: And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
18: And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
21: And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
22: And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

The accounts presented in the two chapters cannot be true both at the same time, for Genesis chapter one tells us that God created man and woman at the same time in DAY 6, whereas chapter two entails that man and woman were created after DAY 6 (in fact, after DAY 7): man first, and then woman from his rib.

How should a Christian understand this apparent inconsistency? What is the preferred interpretation? I would prefer to get an answer from learned people, who can point me to biblical exegesis.

In Genesis 1, God created man and woman. Later in Genesis, God created Eve from Adam's rib. What happened to the first woman?

We have a different literary form these days, for example, the historical novel, which is foreign to the Bible. Yet people today are happy to merge a few known facts with a made up story based loosely on those facts and think nothing of it! The reader cannot tell where the few facts end, and the author's imagination takes over, but usually much more than three-quarters of the book is fiction. Yet people accept that literary form today. It's also used for TV programs and films.

The Bible book of Genesis is very different but people today are not aware that it was customary to state a sort of outline chapter or two first, then reiterate it but with more details. That's what the first few chapters of Genesis does. Simple.

The first woman is the same woman as the one named 'Eve' by Adam after she had fallen for the deception and God had pronounced His judgment. She does not get named Eve until chapter 3 verse 20, but this is the same woman whom God created from Adam's rib (think bone marrow, rich in DNA) in chapter 1 verses 27 & 28, with chapter 2 verses 21 to 23, where Adam first calls this new companion 'Woman'.

We all know what happened to the first female who was called Woman, then a bit later was named Eve. Genesis chapters 4 and 5 deal with the rest of her history.

Can a man date several women at same time?

Okay first of all he was a celebrity with a lot of money. Power and money lets a lot of things be overlooked and Hollywood studios created certain scenarios that only seemed real on the outside. Divorces took longer in those days. News wasn't in real time like it is now. In terms of whether it's possible. If you lead your life with integrity and don't lie to the women about your lack of commitment, then you can do what you want. But deceiving people really hurts you too. And the women that you plan to see have a right to know the risk of STDs by choosing whether or not they want to be with someone that wants to live the lifestyle you're choosing. You could seek partners interested in open relationships or swinging. But you can't make promises you don't intend to keep or keep secrets because then you're hurting other people with intention and that is bad karma. What comes around goes around and tends to bite you in the a*s. But if you have no money and a dead end job, you'll be lucky to get one woman that will put up with your sorry a*s.

Is gender equality even possible?

I agree because even in one gender, there are physical and psychological differences. I think there is another aspect to gender equality, which is teaching men all jobs that women were traditionally responsible of such as taking care of the household. However, it is still an area which is mostly female dominated. Although, there are men who treat women equally on a professional level but when it comes to the house and day-to-day chores, they still think it is a woman’s job and that she would be better at it. In order to get rid of that notion, boys should be raised to be familiar with the same tasks that a girl would. Achieving gender equality isn't just a moral issue – it makes economic sense. Equality between men and women in all aspects of life, from access to health and education to political power and earning potential, is fundamental to whether and how societies thrive. The most important factor in a country’s competitiveness is its human talent, the skills and productivity of its workforce. It is the same for a company or an organization. That’s why the proper participation of half the world’s population is so important for the well-being of both businesses and countries. Although we are getting closer to gender parity, change isn't happening fast enough. Equality is not in accord with reality. Men and women should complement each other based on their differences which are anatomical and psychological. Even in the structure of human life, social existence requires division of labour and consequently the division of men into classes and conditions. Feminists should learn that in nature there cannot be freedom or equality, that nature herself has established inequality of minds, characters and capacities.

How old were Adam and Eve when God created them?

Let us start by stating some facts:The ages of Adam and Eve’s birth were not disclosed anywhere in the Bible.All we can do is use other scriptures, common sense and occurrences to try and answer this question!+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++What they were not: They were not children as some propose because:# God will not punish children in the same manner# God is much more lenient to children who are expected to make mistakes even disobey sometimes.# The vocabulary of Adam and Eve were much more mature# Children don't get married# Children do not name animals as Adam did.# God will not provide a woman for a young boy!+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++So How Old Were They Likely To Be# You might say this is stretching it but hear me out: If Jesus started his ministry at the age of 30 as an adult it is likely that Adam and Eve were of similar age.# Also, Isaac was tied by his father Abraham at a similar age - a sign representing the submission of the only Son to the Father. Adam was also the only earthly Son that was to obey the command of God at a mature age.# As we learn in the Book of 1 Corinthians 15, the first Adam (Adam) and the Last Adam (Jesus) were completely different/opposite. Therefore it is more likely that Adam was formed as a grown man since we know Jesus was born as a baby.# It also occurred to me that the way the scripture reads in Genesis 2 where God gives the command for Adam to keep and care for the garden - was a short period from his formation. You would not give such responsibility to a child but to a grown man!+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++In conclusionAlthough no one knows exactly how old they were because the scripture chose to be silent, we can confidently assume they were of a mature age because of the events that surround their work, sin, and communion with God.Bless youBoomy Tokan

God created man, but man is too lazy, so God created woman. Do you agree with this statement?

Naming all the animals was no small task -  Then the LORD God said, “It is  not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper who is just right for  him.”  So the LORD God formed from the ground all the  wild animals and all the birds of the sky. He brought them to the man to see  what he would call them, and the man chose a name for each one.  He gave names to all the livestock, all the birds of  the sky, and all the wild animals. But still there was no helper just right for  him.  So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a  deep sleep. While the man slept, the LORD God took out one of the man’s ribs  and closed up the opening.  Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib, and  he brought her to the man.  “At last!” the man exclaimed. “This one is bone from my bone, and  flesh from my flesh! She will be called  ‘woman,’ because she was taken from ‘man.’”  This explains why a man  leaves his father and mother and is joined to his wife, and the two are united  into one. Genesis 2:18-24 (NLT)The reason woman was made is in verse 18: Then the LORD God said, “It is  not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper who is just right for  him.”

How were humans created? (scientifically)?

This is a great question. I am glad to see someone genuinely interested in this subject area. While you read my explanation, keep in mind that the processes which I'm mentioning evolved over billions of years. (1 billion = 1,000,000,000)

I will skip the beginning of life as we know it for now. Imagine that this is still a long long time ago and the only life forms are small bacterias. Now, the temperature of the earth is changing and it's becoming very hot in the area where the bacteria are alive. Only the bacteria which have flagella (tails) are able to move away to a colder climate and thus survive and reproduce more bacteria with tails. The other bacteria which didn't have the flagella are dead.

Now let's fast forward a few million years into the future. Now there are a lot of fish in the sea. Most of the fish have gills (to breathe under water) but by random chance, a few were born as mutants and have lungs (just like some humans are born mutant and retarded). Let's say the water in the sea dries up and only the fish with the lungs are able to escape to land and live on it. The fish without the lungs die off and the fish with the lungs live on land to reproduce more things with lungs.

Now imagine the above processes mentioned repeated trillions of times in different locations and different circumstances. Only the best fit animals were able to survive and eventually they were narrowed down to a perfect specimen of working organ systems which are found in the human.

I hope this made sense to you. Good luck soldier.

Can a man lead a life without a woman?

This is a question I’ve been asking myself for the last 3 years as I started to approach my mid-thirties. One day, as I was doing my taxes, TurboTax asked me if my marital status has changed from “single.” For many years, I clicked “no” without thinking. This time, it was different. It dawned on me that I could click “no” for the rest of my life. That moment, I asked myself that same question and recently came to this conclusion - a man can live a miserable life with a wife and a miserable life without a wife, and therefore, a man can live a happy life with a wife and a happy life without a wife.I am not sure what your intention is when you asked this question - whether you are considering living the rest of your life without a wife by personal choice or you are lacking the confidence that you will be able to find one or the right one, and therefore you are curious about how this journey will be. If you are personally choosing to, then yes, you absolutely can. You can choose to be happy or sad right now. How you define your feelings and emotions are relative and are perspectives you can control because they come from your mind. So, if you choose to be single and live your life to the fullest by continuously dating, traveling, and doing activities that fulfill your life, then yes you can be happy. If the latter, however, then no. The man is depending his happiness on external circumstances on things that he can’t control such as getting married or finding the perfect woman.There are people who are miserable and/or lonely in their marriage. In most cases, they are unhappy with themselves because they don’t feel loved by this person they’ve depended on for happiness. This happiness that every other couple “seems” to have, but them. They’ve put their worth on external factors that they cannot control, so they control them. So, control what you can and choose to be happy. And when you are radiating genuine happiness that is being generated from deep within you, then women will naturally gravitate towards you and you will be in a position to choose. If not, it doesn’t matter because you are happy anyways.