Is The Meaning True Or False

What is the simple and on point meaning of true self and false self?

There are three mental operations that we habitually refer to as a self: the navigator of the physical terrain, the navigator of the social terrain, and the main character in an ongoing story that the interior narrator narrates to itself. It would be an error both functionally operationally, and philosophically, to term one of those selves as “true” or “false”. Also bear in mind, please, that the social navigator is composed of many mini-selves, which all take turns engaging with the world of others: a self for a boss, for a colleague, for an underling, a spouse, a parent, a child, a relative, friend, neighbor, pet, and so on. The key is, all these many mini-selves do not know each other, because they do not need to. If we regard our boss (or customer) with the self that normally appears when we engage socially with a pet, for example, it will unnecessarily complicate our already overly complicated lives, you see my point, I trust.So, which one of those many selves is “true” or “false”? They are all true to their domain.I meet and greet someone, smiling, being polite and pleasant, and inside is a voice saying, I don’t like this person for some reason. The polite, pleasant “me” is being true to its domain, and the critic is being true to its domain. There cannot be a “false” self; there is only a balancing act between what will be manifested toward others that serves the self interest of the moment.There can be a fourth self but no one is born with that, it has to be “made” as we go forward in our lives: it could be called the navigator of the cosmic terrain, not a literal space-person in a space suit, but rather a self which is drawn toward experiencing a cosmic feeling, something entirely outside the domain of the social navigator, physical navigator, or the central character in the ongoing story in our heads. It is a self driven by raw curiosity regarding what is this world we live in.We need to try to bear in mind as much as our many selves allows us to as they take turns at the helm of our ship, that there is only one attention, and it serves the interests of the self of the moment, even as that merry-go-round of selves makes its rotations in response to the manner in which life places demands on us, sequentially, one after another, each demand calling forth the corresponding self. It’s quite a thing to witness. Who is the witness self? I’ll leave you with that thought.

What are true fruits and false fruits?

If the edible part of fruit is ovary more specifically superior ovary then it is a true fruit e.g. grapes, tomato ,dates etcif edible part is other than ovary it is false fruit e.g. in apple and strawberry edible part is thalamus, in pomegranate edible part is seeds so it is also a false fruit..

Does "not false" equal "true"?

No, and there’s already some good answers for why here on Quora. I’m adding Russell’s Paradox because it’s a similar situation and I like it. It could be characterized as, “even true, is not always true, every time,” or, “not false, is not always, not false, every time.”Russell’s Paradox celebrated its centennial in 2001. Kurt Godel’s incompleteness theorems Offer an explanation for why Russell’s Paradox exists.____Quote“In the foundations of mathematics, Russell's paradox (also known as Russell's antinomy), discovered by Bertrand Russell in 1901, showed that some attempted formalizations of the naïve set theory created by Georg Cantor led to a contradiction. The same paradox had been discovered a year before by Ernst Zermelo but he did not publish the idea, which remained known only to David Hilbert, Edmund Husserl, and other members of the University of Göttingen.[citation needed]According to naive set theory, any definable collection is a set. Let R be the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. If R is not a member of itself, then its definition dictates that it must contain itself, and if it contains itself, then it contradicts its own definition as the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. This contradiction is Russell's paradox. Symbolically:{\text{Let }}R=\{x\mid x\not \in x\}{\text{, then }}R\in R\iff R\not \in R”Russell's paradox - Wikipedia____End quote

What is the difference between a true lie and a false truth?

“What is the difference between a true lie and a false truth?” My friend is trying to mix 3 soups into one plate. To be honest, you are the best cooker I have ever seen.It’s so hard to combine the truth with lie. It’s like trying to mix oil with water, which will prove impossible at the end of the day.Even in people there are always two sides. Goodness and evil, happiness and sadness, rich and poor, you name it.Truth will always remain so even if it’s the devil who said it. That’s “the difference between a true lie and a false truth”.To conclude, truth is like a star. It’s too far to reach, but we can stare at it only and still we are satisfied by what we see.If you know someone who keep lying all the time, it will be so hard for you to trust them even when they are telling the truth. POLITICIANS IN THIS CASE…NEVER MIND.Good luck!…hope this helps.Thank U for the A2A too.