Who is more powerful, The Queen or Obama?
"Dieu et mon droit" is the motto of the British Monarch in England, it means god and my right, which refers to their birthright. once crowned they are there for life, and any opposition to this is high treason, which until a few years ago carried the death penalty. whereas presidents, prime-ministers etc are only empowered for their elected term of office, no more. you can appeal legal issues through the lower courts, then the royal courts of justice, through the house of lords, and finally to the crown itself. nowadays you can appeal to the court of human rights as a last resort, which should confirm the status of the crown. add before citing the power of the us attack forces, as a means of assessing its ability to achieve world dominance, more thought needs to be applied to its defence capability of its homeland, which encompasses some 4.1 million square miles, as winning a war is a Pyrrhic victory if you have no homeland to return to!!!! whereas the uk is quite small in comparison, about 1000 miles long. in october 1961 in a test of norad's defences, five of the eight avro vulcan bombers that took part, went undetected, landed at their designated us air-force bases, thus completing their respective missions, had their targets been us cities with nuclear weapons you can imagine the carnage!!!! for the record these bombers weighed 70 tons, had a 100 foot wingspan and a 99 foot long fuselage, the one that landed at rio de Genaro international airport during the Falklands war caused a lasting impression to the startled spectators, imagine the expressions on the relevant us air-force base 's commanders faces seeing them land on their runways, knowing they had penetrated their defences undetected!!!!
Is there anyone in the United States more powerful than president Donald Trump?
Someone already mentioned this, but Janet Yellen, the Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve. She has great control over the U.S. and global economies. But she’s also an extremely intelligent and measured person, with decades of experience, who can wield this power very prudently.The same cannot be said of Trump.I will say that James Mattis, the new Secretary of Defense, probably will wield huge amounts of power comparable to Trump. Like Yellen, he’s a very intelligent expert in his field, with decades of experience. He also made it very clear that if Trump goes off the reservation, he will push back. And considering he will control the Pentagon, and has worked there for decades so has the requisite connections and respect among key decision-makers there, that’s a pretty good tool to leverage against any craziness that may come from Trump.
Are any Americans more powerful than Obama?
It depends on your definition of power, but my opinion would be no.Certainly there are more wealthy Americans, but money has to be translated into something else to gain "power," which I guess we'll define by followers, soldiers, weapons, communication/message spread, friends and enemies. The position of President (Obama) was more or less designed to be the single most powerful individual in America in the terms of the Constitution. Yes, that power is checked and supposedly equaled by Congress and the Supreme Court, but as an individual Obama holds the most power. "The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment."I would encourage you to read the Constitution to further help with the question, if not just for enlightenment!
Is there anyone in the United States more powerful than Barack Obama?
No. There are many people who we would LOVE to conclude are more powerful, but the answer is a resounding "no". Any attempt to do so ends up splitting hairs and desperately pointing out the potential for "X" or the potential for "Y". But when you add up all the power, the President always comes out on top. That this power comes with checks and balances doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The power of the Chief Justice comes with checks and balances (the Congress can impeach him just as well). The power of the Fed Chairwoman is not absolute and -- in fact -- the Congress could change the charter of the Fed in less than an hour to permit her termination for having a bad hair day, and thus she'd be gone. No one -- in the USA -- has absolute power. That's how it was designed. BUT, by very specific design, the US president is the most powerful person in the USA by measure of absolute power, social influence and potential power. In point of fact, the ability to destroy the planet is, itself, the measure of how powerful a person is. It's not the ONLY measure, but it's a pretty good starting point. And while that power doesn't rest ONLY with the President of the USA, it is uniquely vested in him and his administration to make that call.Neither the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court nor the Fed Chairwoman has even remotely as much power. The President of the USA appoints the Fed Chairperson and the Chief Justice, that -- in and of itself -- demonstrates the pecking order. The President commands the most powerful military machine on earth, he is the head "spy" of the world's largest and most far-reaching intelligence network every conceived of by human beings with a total expenditure of between $50-75 billion annually JUST ON INTELLIGENCE (about what Britain spends on her entire military).
How can ANYONE who is a Christian support Obama?
There ya go again. Using the word Christian to try to put Obama down. Do you call yourself a Christian ? By the time everyone gets done dogging on Obama, there won't be any Christians left. You don't know any of us, so try not to decide who is Christian and who is not. To Shawn: I resent any one call someone a Fool. Read in the Holy Bible about that. You don't know any of us, so don't call Americans Fool's. When you point one degrading finger at the Americans, there are three degrading fingers pointing back at you. Shame on you.
Is anyone else insulted by Obama's claims?
How do you comprehend that Liberals declare grievance or insult against Obama because of the fact of race? It could no longer be one Conservative in the bunch? Why touch "him because of the fact of race"? If it gets previous genuine promptly then what might you do? curiously which you're a one difficulty voter, that being abortion. positive. Obama is a grassroots organizer, he's the least wealthiest candidate in the race for President, a Harvard knowledgeable Constitutional pupil and a proficient baby-kisser with a great tale. His genetic wiring isn't limited to Anglos yet he actually crosses hemispheres together with his kinfolk historic past and brings forth the terrific of those traditions as an American. His funds raised has been sourced from the human beings, no predominate benefactors like the Clinton's. So his funds can not label him as a liberal, his balloting checklist in the Congress would not upload as much as being liberal. those are purpose data. So what makes Obama a liberal? might the Liberal label advise race or political checklist? might the Liberal label advise he's a huge government spending Republican? it extremely is good which you will care much less approximately his nationality, that's a good difficulty. some do. Obama is qualified to be President of the USA of a. After, extra suitable than 2 hundred years of freedom from the domination of British rule, for the 1st time we've a candidate who has a worldwide perspective in his genes, an educational pedigree that opponents our now sitting President, an mind which could make pragmatic judgements and not only have a made up recommendations. somebody who's aggressive and captivating. isn't it severe high quality that we are able to now have a candidate no longer be judged via the colour of his epidermis yet via the content cloth of his character. I applaud your efforts in this section. If we are able to get extra human beings such as you, who's acquainted with, he might get elected President!
Who is more powerful? The Queen or Barack Obama?
All of y'all for sure have not have been given any concept of the British shape, US has a shape into which his powered are constrained and would purely influence the administrative branch of government. in the united kingdom the form is unwritten meaning if there's no regulation prohibiting the Queen from making use of specific powers she will use them...additionally her powers go into the judicial and legislative branches and the U. S. president would not, the Queen can hire any top minister she needs and fireplace him or her and their governmen, she has to open parliament and be modern-day mutually as regulations are made and he or she will additionally fireplace parliament which she has performed in Canada and Australia. finally military mutually as the U. S. president is the commander of chief his powers are constrained so he can purely boss around to an volume. The British Monarch nonetheless has finished military administration and mutually as she hasn't not performed this she will declare conflict on absolutely everyone she fancies (in assessment to US presidents). So rather Queen Elizabeth is extra helpful than the U. S. President
Is Putin really more powerful than Obama?
Mr. Valdimir Putin the President of Russia is more powerful than Mr. Barack Obama, the President of USA in their respective countries. But if you compare their relative powers in the international politics, then Mr. Obama is more powerful, because USA is more powerful than Russia.The President of USA is a very powerful person in USA. But the Politics in USA is such that they have a balance of power between the President, the Congress, the Senate, the states and the Chief Justice of US Supreme court. The President is quite restricted by the Congress and the strength of representatives of his party in the Congress. If he/ she doesn't have the enough numbers, the Congress could be a roadblock on many things. On the other hand, the democracy in Russia is a recent phenomenon and their institutions are not as much developed compared to other democracies in the world. He has been a President for 2 terms from 2000-2008. The Russia constitution mandates term limits and hence he became the Prime minister from 2008-2012. During that time he got his party colleague Mr. Dmitry Medvedev as the President. At the end of the term of Mr. Medvedev, they switched roles and Mr. Putin returned to Presidency. Normally, such a phenomenon is not possible in other democracies. Because there'll be other strong leaders who'll stake their claim. It is only because of the power of personality of Mr. Valdimir Putin and his political clout in Russia, he is able to achieve this feat. For ex., it would be impossible for Mr. Obama to do what Mr. Putin did (overcome Presidency term limits for a 3rd term). Other political leaders, their parties and the American public itself wouldn't let that to happen.
Is the US President really the most powerful man in the US?
not that i disagree but which movies? and remember to be careful about the wave of insanse conspiracy theories that have hit about everything from 9/11 to Jesus Christ lately. as for your question, you asked if he's the most powerful man and then spoke of organizations that are more powerful. are you curious about the most powerful individual or group of individuals? also, one can mean a lot of things by 'power.' influence isn't neccessarily the same as power. the president still has immense power insofar as he is the president of the us, but w/ an approval raiting below 45%, im not sure how much influence he has on people's minds - and which is more important? good question.
Is the President too powerful?
For example, recent Presidents have basically taken on the power to declare war or use nuclear weaponry, many people can't even name their own reps or senators and therefore are far more ambivalent towards them, than towards the Pres. who far more care for and vote for, despite the fact that his power is supposed to be balanced with that of Congress and the Court, which gives the President the popular support to do what he wishes and the President is even becoming more and more powerful in lawmaking, supposedly Congress' domain. This is directed at the office of President, not any President specifically.