Link To Vote On Undecided Questions .

How many times can we vote?

Once per election cycle. Although each election cycle consists of a primary election and a general election. So you VOTE once in a primary for your preferred candidate within your party and then once again in the general election for whomever you choose regardless of party affiliation. However, each state may have different rules for primary elections as far whether they are open(VOTING for a preferred candidate in any party regardless of the voter's registered party), or closed(VOTING for your preferred candidate only within your party registration).

What are the odds that my vote changes the outcome of an election?

The background to this discussion seems to be the common belief that is not  individually rational to vote when the odds of tipping the election are extremely small.  After all, even if you care a great deal about the outcome of an election, the costs of voting are greater than zero.  So if your chances of affecting the outcome are extremely low, it seems to follow that voting is irrational. Derek Parfit, a moral philosopher at Oxford, shows in one of his books that this is mistaken.  In a nutshell, Parfit points out that in this as in other cases, it’s easy to forget that a certain benefit is enjoyed separately by lots of different people. Suppose that the odds of flipping a modern Presidential election, if you vote in a large swing state, is on the order of 1 in 100 million.  Parfit proposes that the expected benefit of a person’s voting should then be calculated this way (from Reasons and Persons, p 74):  “Superior” here means the better candidate (say, Obama). So suppose that the average net benefit to an American of Obama winning rather than McCain was $500 (if it could be monetized).  This seems like a very conservative estimate. A 1 in 100 million chance of $500 is worth $0.000005 — not much, and easily less than the cost of voting.  But a 1 in 100 million chance of winning $500 for 300 million people has an impartial expected value of $1,500 — much more than the cost of voting.  In other words, the potential social benefit is much larger than the chance of tipping the election is small.  We just tend to forget to multiply by the 300 million. Of course, if you don’t care about anybody else, you can still claim that voting isn’t rational.  What you can’t say, though, is what those who claim voting is irrational generally do say: that even if you care about the well-being of others, voting just isn’t sensible as an individual investment in making things better for anyone because the odds of swinging the election are so low. On the contrary, the argument suggests that voting is just as rational — and as morally obligatory — as it would be to stop off on the way to work and claim a free, one day only offer of $1,500 for a shared national bank account..

Is seconding a motion part of the voting procedure?

Strictly speaking, no.Making (and seconding) a motion is generally how a new idea is introduced to a legislative body. Following that, discussion ensues, then once discussion is ended (which MIGHT involve moving/seconding a “motion on the previous question”) a vote is taken.Thus seconding a motion precedes the the vote. The “voting procedure” begins only after any motions (and seconds).The most common set of rules used for conducting formal meetings (including sessions of a legislature) is Robert’s Rules of Order, though many (perhaps most) legislatures adopt their own set of rules.Disclaimer: The link in the above paragraph goes to Wikipedia. While Wikipedia is, in my opinion, continually improving in the accuracy of the information provided, since it’s a user driven platform, it’s essential to follow, read, and evaluate the source of all external references before accepting the information provided.

How was it found out that George HW Bush was voting for Clinton?

It was at a board meeting for the Thousand Points of Light Foundation where a Kennedy asked Bush who he was voting for, he said Clinton and the Kennedy posted it on her facebook page. This was later confirmed by news organizations.I think that Kennedy thought it would get Republicans to abandon Trump and vote for Hillary, but I think that might backfire.It might actually hurt Hillary in the long run to be endorsed by a Bush. Most people will simply hear Bush and not know the difference between Sr and Jr. The name Bush has been vilified and turned into a dirty word by the Democrats and the mainstream media. Linking the name Bush to Clinton, in my opinion, will only hurt Hillary.Hillary’s polls have dropped dramatically and Kennedy probably was in the circle the wagons mode around Hillary. This appears to have been Kennedy’s way to try and salvage Hillary’s campaign. We are now seeing the dynastic political elite (Kennedy/Bush/Clinton) who have run the country for so many years, circling the wagons to protect the dynastic political elite class. It was quite clear that this election was supposed to be Jeb vs Hillary if the political elite class had their way.The Bush’s and Clinton’s have been BFF’s (best friends forever) for a very very long time.By “leaking” that a Bush is going to vote for Hillary, after staying silent about other Presidents and elections up until now signals a sort of desperation. It is intended to get people to vote for Hillary, but one must remember how the press drug the Bush name through the mud for years. How Obama himself turned the Bush name into basically a dirty word, responsible for every woe the country has had for the past 16 years. To now associate the two names is really politically dangerous and could cause Democrats who are on the fence to leave and probably either stay home or vote for Johnson or Stein. I know that they think most people will know the difference between Bush Sr and Jr, but in reality, the bulk of the American populace is will not distinguish between them, they will only hear Bush will be voting for Clinton.I don’t think it will hurt Trump anymore than any of the politically elite Republicans have already done. I think because of the way Obama and the national press have destroyed the Bush name and reputation that it will hurt Hillary in the long run, even though Ms Kennedy thought the leak would help Hillary.

If you go out to vote, do you have to vote for every position on the ballot, or can you skip one?

You are not required to vote for every position on the ballot. You can just vote for the ones in which you prefer one candidate over the other and leave the rest blank. Or if you have a strong preference for one party you can vote for all the candidates in that party. Either way your votes will be counted and the parts you leave blank will not be counted.