TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

My Guess Is Final Would Be Between India And England

There is a diamond named 'kohinoor' in england, inqueen's cap.i argue they give it back2indians what u say?plz

hello,friends this is venkatesh,indian male/22.as i gain brain,i am arguing british's should give back that presious,super,valuable,worth crores of dollars,kohinoor diamond.they looted it wile they in inda.after the freedom every indian arguing it should b back2india.but british royal family not concidering it.u may think as a indian i am saying this.but u know thousands of valuable,important properties of 1country is in another country. every country should back those valuable assets back 2 the country from wich they stolen ,taken. so this is open forum i am asking u r support 4 that so plz u too argue wit me 4that. also tell weter do u know englands royal family's website ,mail id? phone numbers? if so plz give me.if u can also give me there{royal family's post address}full address. i wish u vote for me in this issue. best of luck everybody.

If Indian women beat England in the WC 2017 final, will India be the only country to win all three versions of the ODI World Cup?

Well , first of all you are forgetting a few versions of the world cup, I’ll name two of the top of my headThe U-19s world cup is a ODI competition, (which India have won)And literally any other form of cricket, I guess for this one we can use Indoor cricket. I mean blind cricket is a very different sport of cricket.So in conclusion YES it is true that you will have won them all but I think you should replace blind cricket world cup with the U-19s world cup and then you will have three world cups that are all unmodified cricket, however you wont be the only country to have won them all, I know for a fact Australia has won them all (That is the U-19 Cup replacing blind cricket on your list). So basically you would be the first if you use the three world cups you have mentioned but I think instead, since blind cricket has totally different rules you should replace it with the U-19 world cup so you have three world cups that are all 50 Over and unmodified (to the most extent).India win the 2014 U-19 world cup.Thanks for reading!!

What funny/stupid message should I put on a placard at the England vs India U19 match on Saturday?

I have flights and hotels booked for Dubai on the weekend. Chances are I will be 1 in about 30 people in the ground (same as the Eng vs Pak series) so I guess my chances of TV coverage are pretty high.

I'm seriously considering placing a placard that takes the piss out of everyone in the Y!A section so thought I would get your input. Don't make it anything too offensive, let's have it go to air.

Why do some Indians have British accents?

wow what ignorant people on here, it's amazing. Let me break it down for you:

- If you're Chinese (because both your parents are Chinese and were born in China (I'm not going into genetics/biology here, I'm assuming you understand that part)), then your parents decide to move to Ireland, then your mum gets pregnant and gives birth to you, you are born and grow up in Ireland, just like any Irish kid, right?

You go to an Irish school, you have Irish friends, your teachers are Irish who teach you and all your classmates English, grammar, science, arts,etc in the same manner... guess what will happen? You will have an Irish accent! oh my God that's amazing isn't it?

- Indians in England=same thing. There are a LOT of Indians who live in England (do a little history search to figure out why), same with blacks, and many other races, who were born and grew up there, guess what..... they all have BRITISH accents, even if those who were not born there but moved there quite young (lots of accents in England though so I'm only generalizing to accomodate your simplicity).


BOTTOM LINE= DON'T BE IGNORANT OF THE REST OF THE WORLD. TRAVEL, WATCH T.V, BE OPEN-MINDED, GO TO SCHOOL, READ, GET OUT ONCE IN WHILE, IT'LL DO YOU SOME GOOD!



- Harry Potter Patil twins- the actresses who play that part were born in England (one from Birmingham and the other born in Wales and moved to Manchester), hence their accents, even though they are of Bangladeshi decent.

I find it odd you only asked about Indians having British accents. What about Cho Chang (who's Scottish) and the black actors in Harry potter?

Why doesn't the British Queen need visa for visiting India?

There are no apparent reasons for british queen visiting India sans visa.There are several theories behind it .Disclosure from the Govt has beee withheld despite repeated request by several intelectuals in the country.Theories behind it,are given hereunder.1-India is not independent,rather it is on lease for 99 years. and ELIZABETH is still the head of state,not the indian president.A few facts which support this theory include that indian president assumes the status of GOVERNOR GENERAL i.e. subordinate to the queen, when the queen visits India.It so happened in 1997 when the Queen visited India  to participate in silver jubili of Indian independence. She became the first signatory on the invitation card reducing our president to a subordinate second signatory level This used to happen in british India when Governor general used to be subordinate to king/queen in presence of british monarch. It is also true,If the Queen is in India, our president cann't give his first assent to any legisation He will be always be the second signatory with Queen being the first one.Further, if  they both differ on the legislation the views of the Queen will have precedence.The bill may be returned for reconsideration by legislature if the Queen so desiders. President's  views have no value.2-Second theory says India is still part of British wealth called COMMONWEALTH.After independence Jawahar Lal Nehru insisted to remain in COMMONWEALTH despite opposition from several quarters.Further India'S entry into COMMONWEALTH is as DOMINION STATE, not as INDIAN REPUBLIC.We all know the meaning of the phraseology DOMINION STATE which means a small state under the sovereignty of a big state.3-Indian constitution is 75% true  replica of GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ACT-1935 which is an act of British parliament.  GOVT.OF INDIA ACT-1935 was passed to tighten the administrative grip over India to crush indian people.4-indian judiciary is still not cent percent independent. It is  partly controlled by british laws.While adjudicating a legal point,if Indian  law is silent on that  point,Our judiciary is bound to refer to british laws5-Transfer of Power Agreement executed by NEHRU and  MOUNT BATTEN. a mysterious document, not disclosed by any Govt.even under RTI is said to contain 1500 points of agreement which include all the theories.Correct and definite answer of your question is available in the said agreement.

Please help me with my history final essay!?

Tomorrow is my history final, and it's a ginormous one on the French and Indian War, as well as the Revolution and Parliament's tyranny. Anyway, our teacher gave us 3 essay topics, and I'm pretty sure that this is the one I'm going to get. If you could please help me, I need three pieces of evidence that will help me answer this question in an essay, because this is the one topic that I'm not too good with. Thanks in advance!

Essay #1: In 1763, a French statesman predicted that England would rue the day she expelled France from North America. Did events prove the Frenchman correct? How are the French and Indian War and its outcome related to the coming of the American Revolution?

Thank you so much!

Who would win in a war between britain and india?

Hmm, well India is ranked the fourth strongest military in the world. U.K. right behind them as fifth.

India has 1.2 billion citizens, while the U.K. has less then 100 million..

Now, if the U.K. had no support from NATO and India had no allied support, i'd be a pretty interesting war. The U.K. has a very advanced and well trained military, while the Indians have a vast population and some advanced weaponry.

My guess is going to be the U.K. will when the battles, but India will win the war. Since the U.K. will suffer great casualties after awhile of fighting, while India will have PLENTLY of troops left, even after massive casualities.

TRENDING NEWS