TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

Need Someones Help Sves

Would you say no to someone that wants to be your house slave?

Depends on who it is.I have a “boi” with a couple of master’s degrees and a high-level job who is my house slave. When he retires that’s what he wants to do full-time.It’s his fetish.I am perfectly okay with it.It was difficult to understand at first that this is what he wants; that it pleases him to serve his “Goddess.”Once I got it, it is no different than accommodating someone who expresses a desire for something else in the relationship, whether its a specific technique they like you to do in the bedroom or the kind of pizza you order on Friday night.It’s a fetish. Sort of a BSDM/FemDom subset except I’m not a sadist and he’s not a masochist. We’re well matched.I had another man who wanted to serve but he would misbehave on purpose because he liked punishment. Since I don’t like punishing we weren’t a good fit.If my “boi” misbehaves, the punishment might be to hold a button against the wall with his nose.He gives me power over him because he wants to be submissive. It allows him to not think and just do as he is told. It’ the least stressful part of his life.If he were not intelligent and educated I would say no because it would feel as if I was taking advantage. I’ve offered to send him to counseling repeatedly but he does not want to change. The moment he does, if that time ever comes, he’s free to do so.

Is it okay to want to be someone's slave?

Definitely need to separate issues of consensual kinky sex from social oppression. When Kanye West says blacks need to get off the Democrat Party plantation, he’s telling people not to be slaves to an ideology. Democrats aren’t too concerned about Sudan’s Muslims enslaving Sudan’s Christians. You can be enslaved by politics, ideologies, religions, or by employers, or more personally by people, spouses, relatives, “friends.” You may consent to suck up to your employer, be their flunky, gopher, servant, slave, but it has some ultimate rewards. Students are slaves in school, obeying, like servile subhumans or dogs. Soldiers obey at the risk of death. Life is a tradeoff, but the trade has to be somewhat fair. In ancient Rome, some free people sold themselves into slavery to free a fellow christian slave. A major atheist of the era, who clung to Aristotle’s theory of physics said if you want a “servant,” get a catholic boy, because otherwise, the “servant” may slit your throat in your sleep. Point is endless factors weigh into how much you defer to or obey others. Psychologists have never really figured this out. Virtuous martyrs consented to be tortured to death. It’s a noble concept, for a good cause. It’s good to be capable of some suffering, pain, for a greater good. Far, far better than killing others for that religious or greater secular cause. But if you want to be enslaved by some individual in particular, think a little about what kind of person they are, and why they would want to enslave you. We’re all slaves to circumstances, fate, governments, life’s destinies, but be careful when you submit or seek out enslavement to any particular person. Know who they are, much better, and put your emotions on hold until you figure out what they’re about better. You want to please someone you like, but be very careful. Charles Manson’s family should have tried harder to figure out why they wanted to obey Charlie. Same with Jim Jones before they drank his Kool-aide. Some very real sadists are out there looking for personal slaves. And their sadism’s limits can be very unlimited, deranged or insane. Monica Lewinsky got down on her knees for Bill Clinton, believing his promise to divorce Hillary and marry Monica, but it wasn’t true. An unpaid intern kneeled before President Bill, and where did it get her?

Does someone with the last name "King" mean that their ancestors were royalty?

King Name Meaning and History

English and Scottish: nickname from Middle English king, Old English cyning ‘king’ (originally merely a tribal leader, from Old English cyn(n) ‘tribe’, ‘race’ + the Germanic suffix -ing). The word was already used as a byname before the Norman Conquest, and the nickname was common in the Middle Ages, being used to refer to someone who conducted himself in a kingly manner, or one who had played the part of a king in a pageant, or one who had won the title in a tournament.

************
In other cases it may actually have referred to someone who served in the king’s household.
************

[Emphasis added. There is a huge difference between being a king and being the 14th most senior royal gardener, the one in charge of the onions for HRH's hambrugers.]

The American surname has absorbed several European cognates and equivalents with the same meaning, for example German Kö*** (see Koenig), Swiss German Küng, French Leroy.

It is also found as an Ashkenazic Jewish surname, of ornamental origin.

Source:
Dictionary of American Family Names, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-508137-4
via
http://www.ancestry.com/facts/King-famil...


More than you asked, on African-American surnames:

All European surnames can be African American surnames. Slaves didn't have surnames. If there were two slaves named Michael in the same area, one owned by Mr. Smith, one by Mr. Jones, people would sometimes call them "Michael Smith" and "Michael Jones" to distinguish between them.

When the slaves were freed in 1865 a goodly number took their former owners' surnames, because they were already known by it, and settled down to be share croppers. Others spit in their owners' eye and headed west to be cowboys. (About 1/3 of the cowboys, 1865 - 1900, were African Americans; Hollywood didn't show that until the 1990's.)

The ones who didn't take their former owners' names sometimes took the name of a person they admired, except Lincoln. That would not have been a wise move in a county where half the barns were still smoldering from Sherman's march to the sea. Others took a generic "Black" or "Brown", or the name of their trade (Carpenter, Cook, Baker) and some undoubtedly took the name of their father; Johnson, Moses, Paulson.

Questions about someone being a sex slave (legally)?

I've been doing some reading on TPE (Total Power Exchange) and IE (Internal Enslavement) and I started wondering, this is actually legal?

Just getting this straight, as long as the slave and master have both signed a contract (see the links below for example contracts) stating that the slave voluntarily gives him or herself to the master, the master is allowed to keep the slave for as long as the master wants? Even for the rest of the slave's life? As long as it doesn't go against the contract?

http://www.albanypowerexchange.com/TPE/slave_contract.htm
http://www.milism.net/cache/336816/slave336816contract.htm
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/1648381/Slave-Contract

more info about contracts: http://www.milism.net/contract.htm

I can see how this would be legal, but I just wanna confirm this.

Can someone help me understand Allison Mack and Dominus Obsequious Sororium? How do people fall for this stuff and willingly become sex slaves, even allowing themselves to be branded?

Because many people have those sorts of fantasies, and if given the opportunity to open those parts of themselves in a safe seeming environment they will do it.The media makes all seem much worse and satanic in the end, but it seems that hundreds of people came and went on that group, most did not complain.Being a willing sex Slave is a fantastic experience. My Slaves encounter a lot of extreme sexual and emotional pleasure. Playing with a Slave’s mind and body releases a lot of pleasant hormones inside them, makes them feel good.When a woman joins my House, she is usually sad and troubled, eats poorly, does not sleep well, is depressed. After a few weeks of enhanced pleasure, after she is taught to orgasm much harder than she ever knew, after she surrenders and exercises and eats well, she starts feeling good and happy. Often she will start sleeping deeply, 10–12 hour nights. People love that!We all want to belong, to be cool, to be free to live up our fantasies. When a group of beautiful people take you in and take the time to give you many orgasms, you feel good and feel that you belong.The branding seems much much worse than it is. How many lovers get matching tattoos? What s a tattoo if not a brand? It pierces the skin and leaves a mark, exact same thing with a minimal difference in the amount of pain and scarification but not that much. Tens of millions of people have tats, probably a million people have matching tats. Not surprisingly you will find tens of thousands of people who enjoy the idea and the permanence of a branding to symbolize their belonging.I have done a few small brands, I personally like and prefer the female form and skin unmarked, but most of my partners would agree and have agreed to me branding them.It’s HOT! Pun intended.

Plz hep need 3 reasons why slavery should be abolished??

3 reasons why slavery should be abolished


1. People deserve to be free, despite the color of the skin, gender, or sexual preference.

2. We are humans and are all equal, using someone as a slave hurts humanity, more importantly, hurts the person who's serving as the slave. That person could potentially become someone important to the world, holding them in captivity could make us miss out on something special.

3. It hurts the nations. These debates about slavery never gets old, insults are common. People have different views on them, and therefore hurts countries politically and create drama that's not worth the time. If we abolish slavery, we won't have to worry about that issue. That would be one less headache, and one less heartache.

Why is slavery wrong even if someone wants to be a slave?

I have found a record of a couple petitioning a court to allow them to become slaves. This was in the antebellum south and the duration was permanent. The reason they gave was they couldn’t support themselves. They certainly knew exactly what they were getting into, far more so the the historical revisionists of today who can only go “Slavery Wrong” “Slavery Wrong” “Rah Rah Rah” and have then used up their complete knowledge of slavery in the South, or those who have only used sources printed in the north between 1830 and 1860. Try reading Booker T. Washington’s “Up from Slavery” Look at the painting “kitchen ball at white sulphur springs” The northern industrialists knew slavery needed to go, but not because slaves were so efficient, slavery needed to go because, whether they worked or not, slaves needed to be fed clothed and housed. Free workers needed nothing if there was no work, and did not even need to be paid enough to feed, cloth and house themselves, if they could be persuaded to work for less money than that. The idea that a free worker could be mistreated more easily than a slave is something hard for many to grasp, they keep saying that a free worker could leave, and if leaving meant starving to death because there was no other work, starving to death was better than being legally considered property.

TRENDING NEWS