# Oop - How To Map Objects To Integers In Python

What are some cool Python tricks?

I think the data structures in the collections module are underused power tools.  I use Counters to represent probability mass functions, defaultdict for accumulating lists, and namedtuple instead of writing small class definitions.I have a note book that demonstrates counters here: Page on ipython.org

What does a map function do in Python 3?

map function takes an arbitrary function and applies it over the elements of an iterable. An iterable, loosely speaking, is anything which allows you to loop through its elements.Consider this example,>>> round(2.3)
2
>>> round(4.9)
5
>>> rounded = map(round, [2.3, 4.9])
>>> list(rounded)
[2, 5]
There are two main components to this example:the round functionthe iterable i.e., list [2.3, 4.9]Let’s say you have this list of hundred numbers that you want to round off. Of course, you are not going to write hundred round statements. One of the many ways to achieve this [in Python] is to use map.You can provide map with the function as argument, and the list of elements on which it has to be applied. The result is a generator expression. The last step retrieves the results from the generator.Now, let’s look at the code below:a, b = map(int, input().split())
Here’s a breakdown:In [0]: input().split()
12 13
Out [0]: ['12', '13']
That is, take an input, split it and create a list, then convert them into an integer by mapping the function int, finally save the results in variables a, b.That’s one way you can take multiple inputs on the same line.

Is OOP important in Python in general?

Why doesn't Java have map and filter as functions like Python? What are the pros and cons of that approach? For what it's worth, Python is considered a purely object-oriented language despite having such functions.

As others have pointed out, Java does have the map and filter function using the streams API. What’s important here is the way Java has realized its functional self: rather than having functional constructs baked into the language syntax (like Python), Java uses libraries. This means that you’re actually calling methods on the Streams API to synthesize functional programming.The pro of that approach is that functional programming is almost an “opt-in” feature of the language. This means that if you want functional programming, you import the library just like you would any other non-essential library. You can just as easily opt-out of it. Besides lambdas and method references, there are no functional constructs in the language syntax.The con is that functional programming is a second-class citizen of the language. If you’re a hard core functional programmer (like Haskell), you won’t feel at home. Contrast that with object orientation in Java which is inextricably linked to the language. You’re always developing in terms of classes.For what it’s worth, Python is not considered a “purely object-oriented” language. It actually marries five different paradigms: object-oriented, imperative, functional, procedural, and reflective.[1]Footnotes[1] Python (programming language) - Wikipedia

Why can't I wrap my head around object oriented programming?

Let me start off by saying that I want to be able to program 2D video games.

My first programming language was Blitz Basic (procedural). I read through the entire book called "Game Programming for Teens" to learn it. I believe that I had a very firm grasp of how programming worked, at least at a beginner level. When I wanted to expand my knowledge to be able draw tile-maps though, there were no tutorials out there for the language that I could fully understand. So I gave up on the language. That was a couple years ago.

Over those years I have tried C, C++, Javascript, and Actionscript 3. I got up to the object-oriented part of each respective book and quit each of them soon after. I like the idea of object-oriented programming, but the deeper subject matter of it just seems to quickly overwhelm me. It's not really even that I don't understand what inheritance or abstraction is (although I admittedly can't remember what abstraction is off the top of my head), I think it's that there's just so much going on that you have to remember and manage. It makes writing my own OOPs difficult because I have to know how everything I'm writing interacts with everything else. Procedural programming comes very naturally to me. Any new language I select comes very easily to me at this point up until the OOP part.

I don't really remember how much of C I learned, but I probably ditched it because I couldn't find good tutorials relating to 2D programming. They've all been fun to learn up until their OO concepts. I really like Actionscript 3, but the OO concepts just crush me. Maybe I just need to learn them slower and make sure I've mastered each concept before moving on. It just seems so complex though, and when I look at how easy procedural programming is it's hard not to ask myself if I'm ever going to understand OOP.

Your thought? Maybe some book/tutorial recommendations (even though I've viewed countless on Amazon)? I've been think about re-learning Javascript through Codecademy.com. Or maybe Python. I love the process of learning a new programming language, but my brain just can't seem to handle it at a certain point. Thank you for your help.

Why is there the "TypeError: 'int' object is not callable" error here?

While it's unclear for now what you're trying to do (I will edit this answer later), a couple of general tips:make function names descriptive. 'fn' is not a descriptive function name;if it's not obvious what the function does from its name alone, use a docstring to describe what it does;you can only return one value. A return statement exits the function, so any code that comes after it, will not be executed.

Can you explain the benefits of object-oriented programming vs. functional programming? I come from an academic setting using MATLAB. I primarily have learned only functional programming. I am now trying to learn Python.

Both object-oriented programming and functional programming attempt to help you manage program complexity, but they do so in different ways. In functional programming, you decompose a problem into functions, and functions are composed from other functions. The data that these functions operate on may be scattered helter-skelter.In object-oriented programming, you decompose a problem into objects, which encapsulate data and the functions that operate on them. An object is a nice, tidy, conceptual unit. It bears a strong resemblance to the module concept in regular procedural programming, except that the data is “hidden” from the outside world and access to the data is carefully regulated by “accessors.” Objects are usually much more fine-grained than modules.OOP programs are composed in one of two ways:composition or aggregationinheritanceInheritance can be a powerful mechanism for reusability, but it mustn’t be overused or abused. Inheritance isn’t always necessary, and composition should be applied when it is more suitable.In class-based OOP, special objects known as classes serve as templates or factories for creating real instances of objects. You create or instantiate an object by using “new” or some such syntactical element. This is typically built into the language. (That’s where “new” came from in your case.)In a pure object-oriented language like Smalltalk, everything is an object, including primitive types such as integers and strings. Through the inheritance hierarchy, these objects will acquire a great many methods and properties. (That’s what you’re observing.)Object-oriented programming and functional programming each have their best use cases. Neither paradigm is universal; neither paradigm is a programming panacea.At the end of the day, it’s all about managing complexity. You just need to understand when and where to apply either of these paradigms.

How do you get Python to print values rather than the memory addresses of functions?

If you pass the name of a function (or any other reference to a function) to the Python print statement (old Python) or the print() function (Python3 and Python2 after any from __future__ import print_function has been processed) … if you do this then you’ll see the object ID of that function (its address in the reference C implementation of the language).This is because that is the default string representation for all objects under Python.To get a value from any Python function (or method) you need to invoke the function by passing it an argument list (in parentheses). This is true even if your function takes no arguments. So for example a function such as:def foo():
return 42
… would be invoked as foo(). You’d print the value returned by that function using print(foo()) (under Python3 or after importing the print_function from the __future__ module in older versions of Python).Understand this distinction, between reference and invocation, is one of the most fundamental skills which much be mastered by programmers in just about any programming language. It’s specially important in using Python, Ruby, Javascript, and any modern scripting or programming languages which support function references as “first class” objects (values which can be passed around like data).