Politics Has Iran Attacked More Nations Than The Usa And Israel Combined Or Visa-versa

Is Israel capable of defeating Iran?

It's very much truth that the state of Israel can destroy Iran if it wishes to do so. Israel has enough weaponry and expertise to erase Iran from the world map. Iran has enough weapons to defend its territories but Israeli advanced technology would outsmart Iran's. Now Iran provokes Israel by telling that it could annihilate Israel within 25 years. It means within 25 years Iran could achieve nuclear weapons and so it could destroy Israel.In 1981 Israeli war planes destroyed Iraqi nuclear site completely beyond repair. It was a daring attack by Israel in history. If Israel could destroy Iraqi nuclear plant, is it impossible to bomb the same on Iran? And the middle east countries are going to nuclear means their sole aim is to eliminate Israel. There's zero tolerance among Muslim countries. They believe and act according to their primitive book koran and there is no reforms in their religion, so they are following the path of destruction.Iran is already a rogue country and add to this the former US president Obama lifted the sanctions on Iran. Obama was anti-Israel US president of all time. Obama is fully responsible for now what's happening between Israel and Iran. As Iran is relieved from western countries' sanctions it got more money by selling oil and got money from frozen properties. As Iran is wealthy now it begins to start its rogue activities.In the name of safeguarding Syrian president Assad, Iran is building military facilities to attack Israel from Syria's soil. Within a specified period Israel would attack Iran. But this attack is not going to be a large scale escalation. The Israeli and Irani war would be changed into Israeli Arab countries war and it might be transformed into a 3rd world war.So in the war between Israel and Iran, Israel would be the upper hand and it could destroy Iran as Israel is the 6th powerful country in the world militarily.

Why does Saudi Arabia conspires with the Zionists (Israel and the US) to attack a fellow Muslim country (Iran)?

Both Iran and Saudi Arabia are powerful countries. They both vie for control in the Muslim world - Saudi Arabia is home to Mecca and Medina, the holy cities, while Iran holds many sacred sites for Shia Muslims and is the largest of the three Shia-majority countries in the region.When Iraq was ruled by Saddam Hussein, the Shia majority was held back from forming an alliance with Iran. The current ruling government in Iraq is Shia led and relies on a mainly Shia army. Add to that the near-destruction of Daesh by Iranian-led forces in Syria and Iraq, you have a consolidation of Shia power from Iran to Syria via Iraq.Add to that the Shia Huthi rebellion and control in Yemen, the backyard of Saudi Arabia, and you can understand why Saudi Arabia is fearful for its position in the region.It’s logical to assume that the Saudis see Iran as a threat - and will do what it takes to reduce its power hold in the region. As Turkey and Egypt are not eager to get into a direct conflict with Iran, it’s logical to assume that the only ally the Saudis can find is the enemy of their enemy - Israel.Israel is threatened by Iranian advances in Syria and support for Hizbullah, not to mention the Iranian Nuclear program. It too sees the Saudis not as an ally but an enemy of their enemy.TLDR: the Iraq war created a power vacuum that brought Iran and Saudi Arabia into loggerheads. The only reason why the Saudis would call for Israeli support is because it’s their enemy’s enemy - not their ally.

If Iran nukes Israel or vice-versa, why should anybody else be threatened by that? What is the big deal? Why should the world declare war on Iran?

Actually it's a big big deal - The common understanding is that Isreal has 200 nukeshttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middl...So, it may not be that important to YOU if a nation of humans is vaporized but we can be quite sure that it wouldn't stop there. As to why you should care if ... for example, Israel, Iran, Syria, Egypt, and perhaps many many others were made into wastelands killing 10s if not 100s of millions of innocent lives, I would suggest that it may have more direct effects than you have surmised.Transport across these regions would be compromised.Water and Air quality would definitely be at risk for any related systems - and not necessarily geographically close; there is a real ecosystem connecting a large part of the planet.The Global economy would be a disaster.  If Israel or for that matter Iran chose to nuke Saudi Arabia (Iran and the Saudis are enemies as well), just imagine the price of oil then.I think it is a somewhat limited viewpoint to imagine that the rest of the world would feel politically and militarily uninvolved which is what i think you asking for - i.e. let them fight it out among themselves. One of the least understood and very difficult to prove scenarios is exactly how much would a country be destroyed from a strong nuclear exchange?  Exactly how much fallout would travel by air and water to neighboring regions.  What exactly are the short term effects.  Some pundits, like yours truly, predict that other than million of people in other countries dieing of cancer and radiation related diseases over the next 10 to 30 years, it may not be be as bad as foretold in the 1950s.  It may be possible to repopulate the regions or the for nations to crawl out of the devastation to rebuild their country.However, I think you may find the geopolitical reality is that we would not be able to just sit by and watch it play out.  Interconnections between countries for all kind of economic, political and military regions are quite important.  And accidents happen.  What if an Iranian nuke on Israel ...and the response ... created Tsumamis or Earthquakes etc that directly killed American soldiers, sailors and civilians?  Would that be enough for us to care?