TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

Question About Munich Conference

What was the purpose of the munich conference ?

B. To stop Germany's expansion into other countries.
is closest, but Munich actually led to acquisition of more territory--the sudetenland--by the reich. The purpose of the Munich conference was to prevent war by resolving the czech crisis--by appeasement or giving Germany what it wanted. This was supposed to be the last territorial acquisition so B is best.

What was the Munich Conference?

A follow up of the Locarno conferenceLocarno treaties following the WWI delimited the frontiers between Germany and its neigbours but were essentially a Rhine Pact. In clear Germany should not touch the West but the East was eventually open to some modification.And Hitler did modifiy the eastern frontiers with the austrian Anschluss and the so called Sudetenland crisis.Munich just acknowleged this new eastern configuration.If Hilter had stopped at this point he would have certainly continued to manage Germany, but he carried on with the Chechoslovak annexion and the “Gdansk corridor” reorganisation, France and England have mobilized but did nothing this was called in France “la drole de guerre” both were actually waiting in the north protecting the Rhine while Hitler and Stalin were cutting Poland.Whether a second Munich would have occured after the Gdank corridor episode is open to question but the fatal error was to invade Belgium

What caused the need for the Munich conference?

By 1938, Hitler was convinced that everyone else in Europe was so desperate to prevent war, that he could get almost anything that he wanted just by threatening war. It seems that he was right: he had bluffed everyone into thinking that the German army was much stronger than it really was in 1938.

After annexing Austria (with not much protest except from his friend Mussolini), Hitler began agitating for the Czech Sudetenland to be "returned" to Germany, because of its majority-German population. Because Czechoslovakia wanted to resist him, and because the Czechs were allied with both Russia and France, there was a strong chance of war occurring if Hitler invaded Sudetenland. Actually, he probably would not have invaded, because his generals were sure that they could not win.

But Hitler was "rescued" from a probable big loss of face, when Mussolini called for a conference to settle the Sudetenland question. The British and French quickly agreed. The Czechs were not consulted or invited. Hitler was able to indulge in theatricals at Munich. And the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia began.

"Peace in our time!" indeed! Hah!

Why was the munich conference unsuccessful?

the leaders of france and britain (and italy) let hitler take over parts of czechoslovakia as long as he promised he wouldn't invade anything else. this is known as appeasement. the leaders did this because, in short, they didn't want war. BUT, Hitler being Hitler went ahead and invaded Poland anyway, along with a couple of other places. so, appeasement didn't work, and the leaders got war. THAT'S why is was unsuccessful, and part of the reason we see Hitler as such a dick.

The Munich Conference and Appeasement?

First of all, understand what appeasement is. It means letting someone have their way.

In simple terms, what happened at the Munich Conference was that Hitler said he wanted to just march in and take over part of Czechoslovakia occupied by German speaking peoples (but not part of Germany). He wanted to extend the German boarder to include these lands.

Representatives of Germany, Italy, France and Britain. The other countries agreed to let Germany take these lands. No surprisingly, there was no representative from Czechoslovakia invited.

By letting Hitler take these lands, Italy Britain and France appeased him in his desire to expand Germany.

Why was the Munich Conference unsuccessful? How could it have been?

Well… how could giving a shot of whiskey to an alcoholic be a sucess in long run?Result is he will only want more.hitler was already arming himself for war, but his aims were to get as much as possible without it. After Munich and anexation of rest of my country he went to damand the same for Danzig corridor in Poland… this time it did not work and war started.so I guess it depends on your definition of sucess… if you would consider preservation of peace as absolute goal… them Munich conference would be a sucess only if Hitler was given unchallanged control of whole planet.I guess Ronald Reagans words ring true - If you want peace then there is one only one way how you can have it immediatly… and way is called surrender. So - it depends on question wheather you value more peace or freedom… sometimes you cant have both.(in general Munich betrayal gave French and British some time to rearm and start drafting an army, it was still not enough for France, and Britain was mostly saved by reality that germans lack amphibious fleet invasion capacity which could match British home fleet - (given how inefficient Luftwaffe proved itself at Dunkirk it would not be decisive factor especially if at least portion of RAF was viable during “invasion”) and while the battle of Norway was draw at sea, Home fleet could afford the loses, Kriegsmarine seized to be effective figting force and was missmanaged - British hunted its battlecruisers down one by one)still war in 1938 would likely cause less damage over the world as Germans would not bled our industry dry by making weapons and tanks for them that easily…they used tanks they got from my country in France and in Russia still. Same comes with trucks, and motorcycles they took from our army, without it their advance in Poland and France would be far slower.

What happened at the munich conference in relation to mussolini and italy?

But his successful war against Abyssinia (Ethiopia) in 1935-1936 was opposed by the League of Nations, and he was forced to seek an alliance with Nazi Germany, which had withdrawn from the League in 1933. His active intervention in 1936-1939 on the side of Gen. Francisco Franco in the Spanish Civil War ended any possibility of reconciliation with France and Britain. As a result, he had to accept the German annexation of Austria in 1938 and the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia in 1939. At the Munich Conference in September 1938 he posed as a moderate working for European peace. But his "axis with Germany was confirmed when he made the Pact of Steel with Hitler in May 1939. Clearly the subordinate partner, Mussolini followed the Nazis in adopting a racial policy that led to persecution of the Jews and the creation of apartheid in the Italian empire.
http://www.grolier.com/wwii/wwii_mussoli...
Making good on promises to the Italian people to make Italy a world power, Italian troops invaded and easily conquered Ethiopia. Italy left the League of Nations when the action was condemned.

Because of Germany's central position in Europe, and the growing war economy, Hitler slowly began to gain the dominant role as dictator of Europe. With quick and easy victories in the reoccupation of the Rhine, Austria, and the Saarland, Mussolini was only too happy to represent Italy at the Munich Conference that broke up Czechoslovakia.

When war broke out in 1939, Mussolini didn't immediately declare war. Only when it became apparent that France would fall in June 1940 did Italy invade. this committed Italy to a war two years ahead of the Italian General Staff’s expectations, and her armed forces were not fully ready for the coming battles in the Mediterranean and Russia.
http://worldwar2database.com/html/italy....

What was the Munich conference of 1938 a symbol of?

Dangers of appeasement.

Great Britain and France allowed Hitler to take over Czechoslovakia (the Sudetenland) even though they had agreed to stop Germany from expanding its territories any further than they already were. Their policy of appeasement completely failed because of this; the want to maintain peace didn't last very long after this when Germany and Hitler invaded Poland, thus beginning World War II.

[Answer: H]

What did Churchill think of the Munich Conference?

~It's 84 degrees out, with a delightful offshore breeze blowing the scent of orange blossoms and roses all across the neighborhood. The eagles are teaching the fledglings to fly. The beer is cold and the golf course is waiting. The clam and oyster bar is on the way home. The leaves are green (so are the cukes, but the strawberries are red) and the sky is blue.

Sorry, I just can't get in the mood to do your homework for you right now. Maybe in a few days.

What happened as a result of the Munich conference that took place in 1938?

The Munich Conference was a diplomatic conference between Adolf Hitler and other major European powers, namely Neville Chamberlain, the Prime Minister of Britain at the time. It was signed by Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, France, and Britain.In the conference, Hitler demanded the Sudetenland, which was a group of areas in Czechoslovakia with a majority German population. Ironically, Czechoslovakia was not actually invited to the conference, so the Czech term for the conference is actually the Munich Betrayal.Chamberlain at the time believed the strategy of appeasement, or basically giving Hitler what he wanted within reason, would bring “peace in our time.” It didn’t. Britain agreed to let Germany have the Sudetenland as long as they ceased taking land from other nations (they had previously peacefully annexed Austria) and that lasted a very short time as they soon annexed the rest of Czechoslovakia. Again, this was due to Chamberlain agreeing on the terms that Hitler stops stealing land.Later, when Hitler decreed to Poland to give Danzig or war, and double teamed the Poles via Molotov-Ribbentrop pact with the USSR, Britain realized that Hitler wouldn’t stop and came to Poland’s aide (although they had already been Blitzkrieged by the time Britain could do much, so they helped France instead).

TRENDING NEWS