How do you put pictures on the internet?
Depends on what you are looking for... Want to share with friends/family & print pics, albums, etc.: www.yahoo.com www.ofoto.com www.shutterfly.com www.snapfish.com Want to join a photo community where I can share photos with other like-minded people sharing pictures: www.flickr.com www.webshots.com Want web hosting for my photo: www.photobucket.com
Does Flickr allow pictures with nudity?
I keep trying to upload my art to Photobucket, and the next day they all say "This image or video violated our terms of use" because they contain nudity. Flickr seems more about art and photography and less about graphics for myspace (etc) than Photobucket is, I was just wondering if photos that have nudity in them would do this same thing on Flickr, because I really need to get it all off of my computer. Thanks(:
How do I share private pictures on Flickr to those who are not Flickr Members?
Despite how things might seem, you can indeed use guest passes with non-members. Easy answer!
Why do pictures on Flickr always look so good?
Many web hosting sites, in my experience, downgrade the quality of the image when you post it, to fit the site. Flickr doesn't downgrade the quality, they are uploaded in integrity, in all their quality. The photographs on flickr.com will look better because you're getting a broader view then on the little screen on the back of the camera. Also, flickr helps you realize when you're not in Focus. I'm not sure why they images look so high quality- just a better site for posting pictures, it's not like Myspace.com
How does one share Flickr photos on Tumblr.?
1. You could share the link to the picture2. Share The complete album as a linkYou may also Auto-post flickr photos to tumblr blog IFTTT recipe to sync both, flickr and tumblr to get rid of doing it every time.
How does sharing photos on Flickr compare to doing so on Facebook?
Flickr lets you upload full time high quality photos that you can download them in the same good high definition quality. But then the uploads are limited to 1 Terabyte of uploads. See if you can reach uploading that many photos.Facebook degrades the photos. It is just for purpose of viewing as a casual photo. From a photographer's point of view, Flickr is definitely way better.
Why does Flickr seem to contain more beautiful/gorgeous pictures when compared to other photo-sharing sites? Why did other sites fail to make its users to do the same?
I think that Flickr's minimalist interface appealed to people with taste and that Flickr became the go-to site for aspiring and professionnal photographers alike. The community then snowballed from there.On the other hand, I also think that it's because Flickr really isn't adapted for sharing anything else than quality pictures. And by that I mean that for sharing casual pictures with a group of friends, Flickr is a horrid tool.- It's hard to give feedback;- Casual pictures are meant to be seen by the maximum number of friends—and there aren't many of them on Flickr;- Privacy settings suck, as you can see by the sheer number of personal pictures searchable on Flickr.I'm sure there are a few more reasons. Please don't hesitate to suggest edits.
Which is best for backing up personal photos and sharing with friends, Picasa or Flickr?
They are different. Flickr is much more about the community around your photos, whereas Picasa started out much more about storing your photos. With the addition of Google+, however, Picasa may become more and more like Flickr.Personally, I am a long time Flickr user and I use it to keep up with my friends' photos and to see interesting photos by the community. It's very easy to see everyone's photos tagged a certain way, for example. In that way.The other aspect to this is cost: Flickr has a yearly cost if you want it to store more than a certain number of photos (upload up to 2 videos and 300MB of photos each month, access the last 200 images uploaded, no access to the original sizes - see here for the full details: http://www.flickr.com/help/limits/).Picasa is free for 1GB of storage, and you can buy more as needed. If you manage your upload sizes, you can probably squeeze more than 200 images in pretty easily. (e.g. 1MB/photo will get you a thousand at an OK resolution for viewing on the web).As I mentioned, Google+ integration has brought tagging and social features to Picasa, though I have yet to really use them as much as I have Flickr's.As for other services, Photobucket powers Twitter's photo sharing feature and they are extremely popular. I haven't used them much, myself, so I can't comment more. SmugMug is another one I've heard good things about. Again, not one I've used, can't comment much on it.Hope that helps.