TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

Should I Start Rueben Randle Or Larry Donnell At Flex

PPR FLEX: Larry Donnell or Rueben Randle?

Donnell - it's a good match up either way

Should I start Rueben Randle or Larry Donnell at FLEX?

Start Donnell this week

Start rueben randle or ahmad bradshaw at flex?

Bradshaw 100%
Ballard out for yr. BShaw will get a lot of work now.
Randle... of nicks goes down... but don't like him.

Cameron seems to be getting over an injury. Donnell looks like Manning's new favorite target. Keep Cameron on the bench and see how he does. Donnell looks like a sure shot to score.

Who to start at WR and Flex (WR/RB)?

Starting lineup so far
QB Stafford over Romo
RB1 Charles
RB2 Moreno
WR1 Jordy Nelson
WR2 ?
Flex RB/WR ?
TE Gronkowski
Def Seattle

Bench Options
Demarco Murray (Q) ... I'd start him at flex but I am worried that Dallas will mix in Randle and Dunbar
Andre Ellington ... Should see more touches w Mendenhall doubtful a Flex Option
Josh Gordon ... Cle's WR 1 Normally a start but bad matchup vs KC and a new QB this week
Rueben Randle ... NYG's WR3 but Nicks has struggled, has a good matchup vs PHI, has been hot

I am interested in your thoughts

Donnell. He's hot coming off of 3 TDslast week and while he will garner extra attention in the redzone I think it is wise to start someone coming off of the best game of his life (e.g. playing with confidence). I also love his size - he runs a ton of seam routes and because of his height and willigness to go up over the middle, Eli can loft it up there for him. This is what worked last week and is very difficult for defenses to cover. Put another way - you will kick yourself if you don't start Donnell and he goes off (plus everyone in your league will laugh at you). Cameron is coming back from injury and is just totally unknown. If Cameron goes off - that's great! You have two viable TE options, feel free to trade one of them and move up at another position.  I personally like Cameron more for the rest of the season.

Answer is "NO". For newbies:The core components are not modified but rewritten completely. I would suggest a newbie to take up AngularJS 2.0 as a new Javascript Framework and not an update of previous version. For Experience:AngularJS 2.0 might annoy experienced developers because, the learning AngularJS 1.x was a difficult tasks. Specifically, understanding digest cycles, scope binding, directives, services and factories. They can relate to the new version since the concept remains the same but implementation has changed. Bottom LineNewbies and Experience Developers are on the same starting point of race and nobody has a head start. Moreover, this is a great time to learn Angular 2.0 because the job markets will be flooded with requirements of people who have expertise in Angular 2.0 (and not the older version.) So, go ahead and learn 2.0 just as 1.x never existed.!!Thanks for A2A!

MVS looks to be the #2 WR ahead of Cobb.Fitz's team as a whole is struggling.Go with MVS and don't look back.

TRENDING NEWS