TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

Someone Explain Nationalism As Reflected Monroe Doctrine

How did the Monroe Doctrine promote nationalism?

In December 1823, in a message to Congress, Monroe set forth the following principles, which would later become known as the Monroe Doctrine:
• The Western Hemisphere was no longer open for colonization.
• The United States would regard any interference in Western Hemisphere
affairs as a threat to its security.
• The United States would refrain from participation in European wars and
would not disturb existing colonies in the Western Hemisphere

Nationalism is the devotion to the interests or culture of one's nation; the belief that nations will benefit from acting independently rather than collectively, emphasizing national rather than international goals. The points of the Monroe Doctrine are clearly congruent with nationalism by making clear the intention of the United States to refrain from involvement in European political activities, and discourage interference by any other country in any interests of the United States.

How did the Monroe Doctrine reflect the wave of nationalism that followed the War of 1812.?

We almost went to war with France,England and Spain after they invaded Mexico while we were in our civil war They invaded to collect on a loan After that we told the U k and Europe that if any country in the Americas owe them money we would collect it for them Look up cinco de mayo

How did the monroe Doctrine reflect the wave of nationalism that followed the war of 1812?

America was prospering and growing independent of European markets, as was it expanding rapidly.

It was essentially a '**** you' to European nations who want to go into America, which they did anyway.

Someone please, Explain nationalism as reflected Monroe Doctrine?

It can be viewed two different ways. The Monroe Doctrine can on one hand be viewed as the United States declaring that it would not tolerate European powers attempting to intervene in the affairs of Latin America. This interpretation is based on the idea that the intention of the United States was to allow the newly independent nations of Latin America to develop along their own lines in the same spirit as that of the American Revolutionaries. On the other hand, the Monroe Doctrine can also be viewed as the United States declaring that it wouldn't tolerate European influence in Latin America because the United States itself intended to become the major player in Latin American affairs. This argument is supported by the fact that in the United States and Canada, the overwhelming majority of the population is descended from Europeans whereas in Latin America, the vast majority of the population is of native stock.

Describe the Monroe Doctrine:?

That is where the US said to all the European nations to stay out of the Americas and not to try to set up new colonies or bases. We basically set ourselves up as the protector or major power in the western hemisphere.

How did the missouri compromise promote nationalism?

Maine was admitted as a free state and Missouri as a slave state; thus preserving the Union. It was all about popular sovereignty and states rights.

What caused the rise of the new imperialism in Europe?

Previous European empires were driven by mercantile interests, the purpose of colonies being to capture a market (the British in India, the Dutch in Indonesia) or control the production of specific trade goods (Spanish and Portuguese in South America). Indirect control was preferred since it was a lot cheaper; before independence in 1947, 40% of British India was governed through 565 semi-autonomous princely states (Kashmir being the most famous).Under ‘New Imperialism,’ colonies enhanced the status of the colonizer and thus possession became valuable in itself. This philosophical development coincided with increased competition for ‘unallocated’ colonies due to the rise of Germany, Russia and the US and their challenge to Britain’s position as the world’s only global industrial power. The Berlin Conference of 1878 recognized the potential for conflict and tried to head it off by dividing colonies in advance. This mostly worked, although the British and French nearly came to blows over Fashoda in 1898, as did the Germans over Morocco in 1905 and 1911.History often focuses on the competition between European Powers, especially in Africa but the US was a large and often ignored participant. The 1820 Monroe Doctrine had unilaterally declared Latin America a ‘hands off zone’ for other powers; this was now followed by the acquisition in 1898 of Spanish colonies in Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines and control of Panama. US Admiral Alfred Mahan’s theory of the importance of blue water fleets to relative national power had immense influence (Kaiser Wilhelm made it essential reading for all German naval officers).It also reflected deeper changes in philosophy and culture; Social Darwinism is vital to an understanding not just of New Imperialism but late 19th and early 20th century Western society in general. A key tenet of colonialism in this period was to interpret Darwin’s concept of survival of the fittest as implying a genetic predisposition for some races (white) to be superior to others (non-white). This is the ‘roads, railways and sanitation’ line, with Christianity thrown in as a bonus. Colonialism was not just helpful to the colonizer but in a perfect conflation of self interest and hypocrisy also to the colonized. You can still see this today in Western concepts of free trade and ‘democracy.’

TRENDING NEWS