Spanish grammer Is this sentence grammatically correct? Ayer te busqué en la tienda.?
Yes.
The original question (the first one only) is:Is this sentence correct grammatically?"IIT Bombay is hiring for various vacant posts: Earn up to Rs34,000 per month : Government Jobs"Use of ';' seems to be right than two times ':'? Is it right to use ':' two times?Answer:I will address only the first question,¹ the text of which is: IIT Bombay is hiring for various vacant posts: Earn up to Rs34,000 per month : Government JobsThis is not intended to be a grammatical sentence. It is an advertisement. As such it can use any punctuation that will help the reader to reach a conclusion based on the terse information provided. No, a semicolon (";") would not do the intended job. It would only separate two thoughts. The first colon (":") is used to introduce the second thought from the first.The posting consists of three separate thoughts. The first two form a sentence in themselves, while the third is not a sentence but a headline. The use of the first colon (":") is appropriate. It leads the reader to the second thought logically. "IIT Bombay is hiring for various vacant posts: Earn up to Rs34,000 per month." The second colon is being pressed into use only as a separator between related but dissimilar thoughts. In effect, "Government Jobs" is in the form of a headline, not a sentence. ____________¹ Note: The format of the parts subsequent to the first question is very hard to work with because it consists only of pictures, not text. This requires the answerer to copy out in text form the original question. This is extra labor for the answerer, which should rightly be done by the questioner.
It is correct, just the accent mark is missing in “qué”. You add accent mark in “que” when it’s a question or exclamation. So it would be:¡Qué interesante es España!You can learn more about accent marks in Spanish here:
Yes, it's correct.Let's take a look at this sentences.“Andrew told me that that Blonde would choose a pack of groceries over a trip to Kentucky”It's clear and obvious that there is a sign of repetition of words but it should be use appropriately.Moreover, you must not start a sentences with two repetitive words of the same part of speech.In most cases, Stammerers tend to use two repetitive words at the beginning, that doesn't mean they are correct.Don't make mistakes on that
It's "neither/nor" and "either/or."If we don't want both pie and ice cream, we use "neither/nor." If we want just one or the other, we use "either/or."Sometimes "neither/nor" doesn't operate in certain idiomatic phrases (e.g. love nor money):It's incredibly popular. You can't get tickets for love nor money.He's hopeless and unreliable. I wouldn't give him a job for love nor money.
It's "neither/nor" and "either/or."If we don't want both pie and ice cream, we use "neither/nor." If we want just one or the other, we use "either/or."Sometimes "neither/nor" doesn't operate in certain idiomatic phrases (e.g. love nor money):It's incredibly popular. You can't get tickets for love nor money.He's hopeless and unreliable. I wouldn't give him a job for love nor money.
There is nothing grammatically wrong with the sentence. But it doesn't have much meaning without context, and would likely not be uttered in isolation.It could be part of a longer sentence: "I write a letter to my mother every week."It could be a response to a question: "What do you do when you are unhappy with your Senator's vote?" "I write a letter."It does not mean the same thing as "I am writing a letter."
There is nothing grammatically wrong with the sentence. But it doesn't have much meaning without context, and would likely not be uttered in isolation.It could be part of a longer sentence: "I write a letter to my mother every week."It could be a response to a question: "What do you do when you are unhappy with your Senator's vote?" "I write a letter."It does not mean the same thing as "I am writing a letter."