Why are cons so unwillingly to see the glaring parrallels that exist between them and the 3rd Reich?
Cons always try to make it a hall mark of their irrational , hate-filled, unsupportable arguments that the Nazis were socialists were were pro - government. Now, right from the get-go their argument goes down the crapper because the Nazis were fascists, and it is ideologically impossible for a movement to be both socialist & facist. Fascism is basically a process whereby one group who believes they are superior for ideological, religious, or racial reaons creates a movement through which to facillitate enacting that doctine; often cases members of such a movement attempt to paint various segments of society as undesirbales, and this often includes allocating resources on an allegedly meritocratic system. In essence, fascism & capitalism, are FAR more compatible than facism& socialism (or it;s extreme form communism). Both capitalism & facism can become mechanisms with which to justify giving to the few at the expense of the many; concepts which are vehemently opposed by socialism which emphasizes the collective
Universal Health Care...pros and cons.?
the only way it will ever work to help all people is if it's universal. they way insurance companies do it is they only give insurance to people they don't think will cost them money. so sick people can't get it (unless their job has a plan that covers everyone). so you have to make them give insurance to sick people. they won't do it unless you make them. but you also have to make everyone buy it. if you don't, then people will buy a car instead or whatever and then still get treatment when they get sick. but it's better to treat them while they're healthy and prevent illnesses. and if you don't make everyone buy it, then it costs more for the people who do. there's no free lunch and someone always has to pay for everything. it's fairer to have everyone pay equally. plus it brings the cost down for everyone if the insurance companies can't play their games that are only for their benefit. (by the way, despite the extremely deceptive ad that obama is running, hillary's plan does NOT require people to buy insurance "even if they can't afford it." if they can't afford it, her plan has subsidies to reduce or eliminate the cost.)