Why was the decision in brown vs board of education a significant step toward ending segregation?
"Separate, but Equal" was still segregation and B vs. B clarified and rectified the problem
What was the significance of Brown v. Board of Education?
There is a wonderful podcast by Malcolm Gladwell on the Brown decision, called "Miss Buchanan's Period of Adjustment".http://revisionisthistory.com/ep...As great and as important as the Brown decision was, it didn't go far enough, and the courts weren't willing to back it up. So the net result was that tens of thousands of African-American teachers lost their jobs, and thousands of African-American students lost out on college opportunities.On the loss of jobs, what happened was that across the south, Black schools were closed, and their students integrated into the existing white schools. The African-American teachers all lost those jobs, and then when it came to hiring more teachers for the now-integrated schools, all the new teachers who were hired were white. This led to another case, Brooks v. Moberly School District, which the teachers lost, and which the Supreme Court refused to hear.In terms of the students, being moved to white schools had a negative impact on their education. One reason is that the quality of the teachers at the Black schools was really, really high, which is easy to understand: you're a smart, capable, African American man in 1950's Alabama. What are you going to do for a living? Doctor? Lawyer? Sure, if you're willing to leave the state. But otherwise you're going to be a teacher. The teachers in the Black schools in the south were often ridiculously overqualified.The second reason is that African American students in Black schools had no difficulty in getting into advanced placement courses and gifted programs. The teachers were motivated to help them. But once the schools integrated, those students lost that level of support. A Black student had to be twice as good as the white student to get the attention and opportunities that he or she deserved.Check out the podcast. And say a little prayer for Linda Brown-Thompson, the schoolgirl who started it all. She passed away last week.
Why was the decision in Brown v. Board of Education a significant step toward ending segregation??
The decision form Brown v. Board of Education desegregated schools in America. Since schools were integrated and blacks were able to go to school with white children, it brought the country one step closer to desegregation. Plessy v. Ferguson previously said that facilities for blacks were to be "separate but equal," meaning they would have the same facilities as whites, just separate. Brown v. Board of Education overturned this decision and said that it was unconstitutional. The US Supreme Court said that separate facilities are "inherently unequal." This ruling started desegregation by ending the "separate but equal" ruling.
What was the significance of the Brown vs. Board of Education ruling by the Supreme Court?
Brown vs. Board of Education (1954) was an important case because it overruled segregation in schools, declaring that it was "inherently unequal" to maintain separate institutions. The previous logic to segregation was that the institutions were "separate but equal." As a result, black and white children were allowed to attend the same schools, though the decision took a very long time to implement and often wasn't implemented until well into the 1960s. The decision was important because it gave the Civil Rights Movement a push - the NAACP's legal success in the case would show the African American community that the society was ready for change. As a result, Brown vs Board of Education had a legitimizing effect that encouraged further action on behalf of the quest for equality.
Brown vs Board of Education help??(civil rights movement)?
Brown vs Board of training became a milestone because of the fact it help positioned an end to segregation. in case you do not understand the case, it became a pair of black kin that had to take their infants to a distinctive college for the duration of city for blacks, yet they lived around the line or interior of attain a school regardless of the undeniable fact that it became for whites. And so the case for sure became taken to the wonderful courtroom and smashed the ideology of the Separate yet equivalent clause because of the fact Separate isn't equivalent. Black colleges had poor facilitites, tattered desks and textbooks, and inadequate curriculi. and clearly the whites had extra valuable ammenities. because of the fact even nevertheless that they had their very own colleges, it wasn't an theory of growing to be the black community waiting to succeed, yet something to offer each and every physique something to think of that became equivalent in view that that they had their very own, yet by skill of no skill became it equivalent. yet confident that became significant because of the fact it opened the doorways for intergration and for blacks to recieve a extra valuable training with extra valuable centers. Google Brown vs Board of training and additionally you gets a wealth of information approximately it.
Brown v Board of Education?
Yes, Brown vs Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas was really the first stepping stone on the long march towards civil rights. It had a major impact in all areas of civil rights, because the supreme court decision was used as a precedent in all civil rights court cases after Brown v Board of Education. . Supreme Court of the United States decided May 17, 1954 Full case name Oliver Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. Segregation of students in public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because separate facilities are inherently unequal. District Court of Kansas reversed. Court membership Educational separation in the US prior to Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. The decision overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson decision of 1896 which allowed state-sponsored segregation. Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Warren Court's unanimous (9–0) decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal."
Why was Brown vs. Board of education important?
The Supreme Court ruled that segregation of schools by race in states was unconstitutional. This meant: Blacks and whites could study at the same schools and in the same classes. Blacks attending previously whites only schools would now get a better education,as whites only schools were much better funded by State governments. In a wider sense,the Supreme Court was ruling that all segregation by race in states was unconstitutional, so the decision opened up integration throughout the USA.
If Brown v. Board of Education had been decided the other way, would black education in the US be better today?
With the edit made in the original question, my answer is no longer responsive. I think Jevan Lemoine has a much better answer now.----The question asks us to assume that parents have complete control of public schools. This is not the case in most schools. The assumption is not helpful in imagining the state of black education in a world without Brown v. Board because “separate but equal” still requires us to take away local control from black parents.The fact is that most parents, black and white, lack significant control over their children's school. Enforcing "separate but equal" in public schools would require that any mandatory curricula or testing requirements imposed by local, state, and federal agencies would have be equally applied to all schools: black and white. Black education would still have to abide by the Federal No Child Left Behind; black students would still have to learn the same "content standards" as their white counter parts. Having a separate black school district with separate administrative hierarchy and standards would not be "equal." Segregation alone would not automatically lead to more local parent control. Regardless, of the issue of local control, a segregated school system would still be bad for black children. It's hard to ignore the argument that separate schools would be inherently bad for children. The Court held that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal" and that segregation has a "detrimental effect upon the colored children." The argument was made that even if equal, by requiring segregation, black children would learn that they are inferior and that this belief would cause negative psychological effects that would harm their educational future. For example, black kids would not bother going to college because they "know" they are inferior. I think that the question proposed in the comment is far better - "Would any school that is controlled by the parents of the children going to that school have fewer problems than a school where they have no control or their control is diminished?"This question is independent of race and I will admit that I am not sure of the answer.
Earl Warren and Brown vs. Board of Education?
They governed that the belief of "seperate yet equivalent", upheald below the equivalent secure practices clause grew to become into inapplicable because of the fact the centers provided in black and white colleges have been unequal, for this reason to verify equivalent secure practices the court docket governed that de-segregation grew to become into unlawful. That grew to become into the gist of the written decision besides. because of the fact they could no longer enforce the call whether, Pres. eisenhower had to deliver in the national safeguard to escort the babies. The North and west coast grew to become into wildly adversarial to segregation as have been the significant human beings in Washington. It grew to become into particularly in user-friendly terms the previous confederacy that supported it.
Why was the case of Brown vs the Board of Education a turning point in the struggle for civil rights?
It challenged both the concept of "separate but equal" and "the way things are" "Sseparate but equal" wasn't when white schools received more funding and produced more college attendees. The excuse of 'that's the way things are" was used to expalin away social inequality by casting it as the 'natural order of things' out of the control of the perpetrators. While you can thank the Civil Rights Era for changing these things through both passive and aggressive confrontations, the true savior was television which broadcast events every night into our living rooms so that we actually witnessed wrongs being committed against fellow Americans that were never seen by most people before. Such is the role of the internet today and why its voice is constantly being attacked to silence; the same people who hated then wish to silence now.