Why is wwe so much dependent on roman reings (he is boring)?
A2AIt's a good thing that I got this A2A now. I happened to read an article the other day about how much a hypocrit the WWE fans who boo Reigns are. They wanted someone new to take over the mantle from Cena and Orton and the likes. They wanted Reigns. They cheered for him in survivors series and during his record breaking rumble performance. The very same people who wanted him to be pushed then are booing him now. The result, we are back to Mc Mahon family drama that overstayed its welcome by more than 10 years. You can read the article here - Roman Reigns Hatred Blinding Fans to McMahon Epidemic For years, fans begged WWE to push young talent. They pleaded for the company to bring forth Superstars of youth that could supplant the John Cenas, Triple Hs and Undertakers of the world and carry it into the future.When Reigns put forth a dominant showing in the 2014 Royal Rumble, fans reacted favorably, and it appeared as though the company had done right by them. When he received such a strong pop for beating Triple H and leading The Shield to a victory over Evolution later that year, the juggernaut was firmly established as the future face of WWE.But as the push became a reality, fans turned on Reigns, booing him because he suddenly and inexplicably did not represent what they wanted in a top star. It was hardly the first time that had happened. In the age of the Internet, fans had a history of building up a Superstar through tremendous cheers and incredible pops, only to reject them when it was no longer cool to cheer WWE's chosen one.Here is a tweet from a 'fan' during 2013 as a bonus:Got to admit I love Roman Reigns and hes being held back being in the sheild #RAW— Carol Louise Girt (@xo_chuckie_ox) November 12, 2013
Would you say that the Ultimate Warrior was one of the most boring wrestlers in WWE history?
Hell no! .In the late 80s and early 90s, Ultimate Warrior, despite his in ring skills, was OVER!! He was more over than Batista was in 2005, which I consider Batistas best year to date. Warrior sold out arenas nationwide, and was WWF's biggest draw behind Hogan. I look at it this way...If Warrior wrestled like Kurt Angle, it would of killed his gimmick. Warrior was anything but boring. Edit: I wanna add this about his promos. I loved them. They totally fit his character....They werent SUPPOSED to make sense. Warrior was from another planet, and it totally worked at the time. Dont listen to WWE in the DVD they put out trashing him....He made Vince McMahon ALOT of money and since they're on bad terms, Vince did a DVD unfairly trashing a man that carried the WWF for a full year when he was WWF World champion
Is Triple H really a bad guy backstage?
Is he really an opportunist? Its seems that, he's trying to overshadowed the younger talents of Smackdown. How selfish this can be? Instead of trying to help the younger talents to rise up, he's trying to get rid of them so he can get more fame and popular. HBK and The Undertaker are much better because, they're allowed the younger guys to rise up. Do you guys think he married Stephanie for love or Benefits? or Both?
Why are WWE storylines so bland and boring nowadays?
Because that’s how Vince McMahon wants them to be. Vince is a relentless micromanager and is always changing his mind about the direction he wants things to go. You can’t really build a complex storyline that lasts for months when the boss man comes barging in wanting to adjust things constantly.You can see the difference in the creativity within the company by comparing the mainsteam WWE product (overseen by Vince) to the developmental NXT product (which is overseen by Triple H.)WWE’s main sources of money are live events, merchandise, their TV deal, and as of this year their deal with Saudi Arabia to put on special events in that nation.The main WWE shows can be bland and boring, but as long and they’re not outright godawful the people WWE views as its main fanbases will keep watching.One side is little kids who like the WWE because the matches are neat, exciting, and fun and thus will watch and want to go to shows with their parents.One side is older people who have been watching wrestling for decades and they just watch because it’s wrestling.For those of us that like more interesting storytelling, WWE has made its developmental NXT brand to fill that role. The NXT Takeovers are ALWAYS better than the WWE PPV’s that they’re paired with and the in-ring product and storylines are almost always superior.Things will probably get better when Vince steps away from the product, which will likely be when he dies as he’s something of a notorious control freak. Literally. He gets upset with himself because he can’t prevent himself from involuntarily sneezing.
Who thinks smackdown is so boring and stupid?
i actually went to a smackdown show about 5 or 6 years ago...its way longer then 2 hours....they do a ton of editing including cutting out matches...they also put things in different order on the broadcast....like the 2nd match i saw live wound up being the 3rd or 4th match on tv days after the event....plus I got to see an entire sunday night heat episode when i went there,,,actually i may have seen the other show they used to have (the green setting) and it lasts about an hour.....so you are getting alot more than 2 hours just to let you know.....as far as the show itself, i do find it boring....but i have DVR so i just record it and fastfoward to the diva matches and anything to do with HHH, Undertaker, edge, etc....skip past th hour and a half of garbage lol
Will Triple H vs. The Undertaker--Hell In A Cell Match Steal The Show at Wrestlemania XXVIII?
Yes it probably will. From the obvious matches I think that Undertaker and Triple H will be the best match, followed by Punk/Jericho and Rock/Cena. It will be sheer talent, and look for some high flying moves by the Undertaker, maybe a chokeslam off the top or a tombstone through the middle taking Trips to the ring. I think Undertaker will retain the streak because The Game will have nothing to gain by ending it. BQ1: I think #4. The first two go to .Vs Micheals, and the 3rd goes to .Vs Orton. Bq2: Yes, but his best was with Micheals.
Do you prefer watching scripted or non scripted wrestling?
It depends on the skill of the wrestlers. Two experienced wrestlers can get in the ring with no script and go off physical cues from each other or whispered instructions and the match ends up looking like a million dollars. Inexperienced wrestlers or wrestlers who are unfamiliar with each other try the same thing and you end up with all the awkward pauses, the misses, the slow covers, etc. The same goes for mic work. A shoot is a lot more fun than a scripted talk if the wrestler has good mic skills. The Rock was excellent. Triple-H is very poor. I know CZW. I enjoy watching any promotion I can. I suppose my favorite is still WWE since they can deliver a more consistent level of entertainment with a larger roster, better technical staff and production qualities and, most importantly, they can feed my pro-wrestling fix four times a week!
Why is WWE not so interesting these days anymore?
I will deflect slightly from the above mentioned notion. Currently, WWE is interesting but not as interesting as before. Gone are the golden days of Attitude Era; gone are the days of Shawn Micheals, Rock, Stone Cold, Triple H, likes of who were great on mic as well as in the ring. There are lot of reasons for it.Being PG, WWE cannot showcase the preposterous segment that were aired live during the Attitude Era, which were entertaining.Now a days, almost every storyline is based upon the same recycled recipe that negates even a good match; wrestlers capabilities and makes WWE less interesting.These storylines didn't have any build-up because there are too many pay-per-views happening. They seemed rushed.Vince pushing his stereotypical buffed wrestlers more but fans are fed up of it. For example, Roman Reigns has been pushed too much and for too long.Still being dependent on a small group of wrestlers, that are, Brock Lesnar, John Cena to get the job done.Changing RAW to a three hour programme.Wasting of a good talent with a bad storyline or a bad gimmick.All these points are interconnected. Lastly, previously, WWE had too less championships to cater to the vast variety in the locker room. But after the coming of the prodigal son, Shane McMahon and the brand spilt, things have started to change. And there is silver linings with likes of AJ Styles, Kevin Owen, Finn Balor, Bray Wyatt and of course, Seth Rollins.