Is Samsung really copying Apple?
each thing is copied from all and sundry. a corporation will make a product and upload a small insignificant code and get in touch with it their very own. in case you needed to get particular you may say that apple copied touch displays from palm. They have been the originators of the touch show. Apple copies application constructive properties from android. additionally, its no longer likely honest to declare that Samsung copies Apple, its extra like Samsung is offering a extra no longer expensive product instead to Apple (even nonetheless it out performs spec clever). FYI, in case you do your learn, Apple has been making use of Samsung chips for many some years of their Ipods. Why could they stay interior the history to Apple while they MAKE Apple??
Yes, yes and yes! Samsung has a nice line of products but they are guilty of stealing design leads from Apple. Some examples are the iPod Touch, iPhone 3, Macbook Air. The latest is their Chromebox which looks exactly like the unibody Apple Mac Mini.
I would prefer the word "following", instead of copying and they probably followed Android (not Samsung in particular)Device size. Apple has been saying for years that their competitors’ phones were too large. They said it was silly & they wouldn’t do it. And now, they are finally releasing larger phones. Apple was fully capable of both the idea and the implementation years ago, and simply thought it was bad form. They thought it was a fad. They thought the competition was wrong, and that there wouldn’t be enough customers asking for it.They were wrong.It turned out, millions of people want bigger phones. So, due to massive demand, they finally did this thing they could have done years ago but didn’t want to. Now, that’s not copying, that’s being wrong about a market due to design arrogance.Tim Cook himself mentioned his competitors when he talked about device size with a reporter, saying, “We released larger phone sizes, like our competitors before us…”, or something to that effect. He clearly acknowledged that they were following.
Why is apple only suing samsung for copying the iphone. There r tones of other smartphones similar to iphone?
all and sundry on right here enable you to understand the telephone they desire rather than the excellent telephone ! And to a element it particularly is all they are in a position to do has what's the excellent telephone for me is probably no longer the excellent telephone for the subsequent individual. besides the undeniable fact that I even have been an exceptionally unswerving apple consumer for years and very own many apple products which includes a Imac pc a macbook air and the ipad mini. and that i've got owned each and every iphone ever released so as you may in all likelihood tell i myself like apple products, yet even I even have jumped deliver these days and gathered the Galaxy be conscious 2. and that i could say it is been a actual eye opener via fact the telephone is leaps and obstacles previous to the iphone on the applying effective components section which i never although might ensue has i carry apple in very severe regards. So i assume it particularly boils all the way down to what you pick from the telephone ? In apple you have got a appealing finding and o.k. made gadget that runs an exceptionally soft working equipment yet in all honesty is slightly underwhelming after a jointly as. Or in case you desire reducing side effective components and a miles better show screen and greater open working equipment that makes it possible for a very good style of tweaking and customising. I for a protracted time favorite apple and to a undeniable volume nevertheless think of the iphone has stable reward yet there is not any way at this minute in time i may be prepared to offer up the issues the Galaxy be conscious 2 can do and the openness and freedom i'm getting with android.
Why does Samsung always copy Apple ?
what makes you think so...the samsung stuff are so plasticky...apple is some what better in quality... But i am a hard core sony fan.... - AJ
Samsung copies Apple.Apple copies Samsung.Companies would get nowhere if all they did was use their own technology. Seriously, Apple even bought every iPhone X screen directly from Samsung.To quote the great Steve Jobs (who was actually quoting Picasso), “Good artists copy, great artists steal.”
Apple is hugely profitable but all said and done is primarily a one or two products company — iPhone and to a lesser extent MacBook. A single technological change can change its fortunes.Samsung on the other hand is a conglomerate with interest and expertise in electronics, home appliances to heavy industry. It's expertise and portfolio is diversified and hence more resilient.
Samsung copies Apple.That is true.Because Apple makes stuff that is innovative.And if they aren’t first to the party, then they improvise on it.For example: Samsung released the S8 with the “Infinity Display”Everyone was amazed to see the display being massive and the bezels so small.Then came the iPhone X, entering as a villain.The iPhone X was all screen except the notch at the top.It was amazing.No bezel, except the notch.Face ID. (Apple wasn’t first to integrate facial recognition, Androids have had it longer than I can remember but it wasn’t 3D and it took a photo of your face using the front camera to recoginize you and it could be fooled easily).
Why did Apple sue Samsung?
This whole thing is a load of something I should not and will not say. Manure. Put it that way. I am like Biff from the awesome Back to the Future series. I hate manure. And Apple has been nothing but manure since Wosniak left. Tek Syndicate did an amazing video on this on their YouTube channel. Anyway, you can't sue for the "bounceback" effect when a page is scrolled down further than the content allows! What else is there to do? Have teleporting text when the page is overscolled, as it were? That would be both confusing and sickening. Stop the text from scrolling at the bottom? Oh, no, that wouldn't work, because Safari on an iMac from 2006 already does that! Point is, Apple is such a corrupt company made of manure that they will sue for pinch zoom, or "bounceback", or a certain GUI that just happens to have a layout with pushable widgets! They seem to be creating traps in some cases! Let's just patent everything so that nobody else can do anything, make products for 3 cents, woo the masses, and sell overpriced polished manure! Woohoo! I could be the new CEO of Apple! When is Motorola gonna sue Apple for the idea to have settings accessed by the swipe of a finger from the extreme edge of the screen inward? Sure, Android swipes from the top down and Apple swipes from the bottom up, but is there really a difference? Apple, monopolization is illegal.
Apple vs. Samsung: Who is better?
I think samsung. Apple has no removeable cover, where samsung has one. In there there is the battery and sd card. The battery you can take out if your samsung device glitches up, and the sd may be in the the cover or outside. The sd card has storage for music, or other stuff. When Apple devices freezes and it is hard to get it back working. Also my tablet can remove all running apps in the touch of a button. The importing process on an Apple is long, where samsung, you can copy and paste. PLUS IT IS NOT ABOUT POPULARITY IT IS ABOUT QUALITY. Also Acer vs Apple. Who wins? Acer. Acer 8.1 - $300 plus tax. Apple - $1 K Plus tax. Save money. I also have a GT-S583OD THAT, HAS WORKED FOR 2-3 YEARS. It is also turned tables that Samsung Copies APPLE, where instead Apple copies Samsung. Samsung features: Little built-in games, More Phone variety, More password locks, Samsung has fridges and stoves, Clear apps all at once, More storage, can remove cover, durable screen, fast, cheap, owned by google, *google is a search engine(Apple isn t)* Steve Jobs is dead, and easier storage interface(when moving files)