How to write a book review?
Step 1 Familiarize yourself with the genre of the book you are reviewing. Whether it's a work of Italian postmodernism or contemporary poetry, knowing the conventions of the form will help you write a knowledgeable and authoritative review. Step 2 Read the book you are reviewing actively, making notes as you go along, either on slips of paper tucked in the book or on self-adhesive notes. Step 3 Briefly describe the book, touching upon its subject, scope, and, if it's a work of nonfiction, the author's primary assertions. Although an exhaustive description isn't necessary, your readers will want to have a general idea of what the book is about before they decide to read further. Step 4 Offer your critical opinion of the book, supported with examples with the book, your knowledge of critical theory, or other facts you have researched. What are the book's major strengths and weaknesses, and why? Step 5 Compare the work to others by the same author or others in the same genre, if appropriate. Describe the book's place in its field. Step 6 Conclude with some statements about your personal judgment of the book. Is this a book you would recommend to readers? Tips & Warnings -Consider the concerns of your particular audience when writing your review. -Using short quotes from the book you're reviewing can be doubly helpful because they not only can help you support your opinions, but they will also give your readers a sense of the book's style. -If you choose to read other critics who have written about the book, do so only after you have read the book and formed your own opinion to avoid being unduly influenced by others. -Be careful not to give away too much information about the plot development, especially surprise twists. Leave this for the reader to discover. Peace :)
Best AP US History Review Book? Language and Composition?
I took APUSH and language and composition last year and i found that the Princeton review books were really good. for history i also got the Barrons flash cards, its a box of 500 and they are really good to use through out the year for in class test as well as for reviewing for the AP test. Because english is not as factual as history there is not as much to study its more about being able to write and analyze well, but the Princeton book is mainly literature terms and if you can memorize them you will find the multiple choice section of the test much easier. The year of the book does not really matter they are all basically the same a newer history book will just include more information on bush and obama. but i heard they may be changing the format of the tests this year so an up to date book is probably best so you know the new format when you take the test. Good Luck!
When writing a book review, do you use present or past tense?
The correct approach is to use the present tense to restate any action that takes place in the book. When stating your own reaction, however, you can use a more flexible method, although my personal preference is to remain in the present tense as much as possible. With respect to your own opinion, no fixed right or wrong way exists, but for relating the events in the book, clearly the present tense is the only acceptable option.
What is the purpose of a book review?
The basic purpose of a book review, as I see it, is to help readers decide whether to read the book themselves. A book review should identify the central idea of the book, give the reader some indication of the author's style, approach, or premises, and then offer an overall evaluation. The reviewer should tell the reader what the book covers, but in a selective way. If you're the reviewer, don't recap the entire book. And if it is a work of fiction that you are reviewing, certainly don't spoil the ending or reveal any surprises.In some circumstances, it is appropriate to engage more intensely with the material in an extensive, point-by-point treatment--for instance, if you really want to refute an author's entire theory and work. That, however, is more of an essay or commentary, and with some exceptions I tend to prefer to see that sort of thing published as such--not as a book review.
Which AP classes should I buy a review book for?
It depends on the subject. The most important thing you can do, truthfully, is to get a good textbook for all of your AP exam if possible. It’s your tool for helping you learn the material that will be on the exam, help structure your preparation, and allow you to test your learning comprehension with review questions. It’s critical that you choose the books that are recommended as those will help you best prepare. Here’s how to find the right textbook for your AP ExamCheck the College Board’s list of textbook recommendations on the AP course audit page for your exam.If you’re self-studying for an AP course that your school is offering, you can see if they have a textbook used for the actual course.Be diligent in reading reviews of any textbook you are planning on buying, and see if it helped others prepare for the AP exam.Use review sites like AP Review Book or PrepScholar can help you along the way.
How to write an art review on a piece of art?
You should a little bit about the history of the artist and (if possible) the particular piece of art that you really like. (I say "really like" because that way you will probably be able to think up more things to say about it - but you could also choose a piece that you really don't like, but then you should wonder why someone thought it was good enough to put into a museum). With a little background information, you could either decide to focus on the importance of that particular work in relations to other examples of art of its type. More easily, you could try describing particular aspects of the work - it's use of color to convey light or emotion, particular techniques employed and their success of those techniques, the overall impression that the work conveys
What is the thesis of the book "A People's History of the United States"?
Movie whatever it is is just full of himself and knows nothing a bout Howard Zinn. Alex is on the right track. There are these people that don't understand that there are always other ways of looking at history that are different from what your 5th and 8th grades taught. Zinn's philosophy is that history is not just names of famous places, dates that famous people did something, names of famous people and the two bit teachings of 5th and 8th grade teachers. There is a very good volume by an author named Williams that is similar to Zinn's work in many respects. That book, A Peoples History of the Civil War, does not spend a lot of time on generals and battles, but spends it on who the people lived during those arduous times. So Zinn looks into the lives that were led by simple individuals, how, for instance, they made it through the Revolution and Civil Wars when supplies were short and they just had to get by. It is basically, therefore an extention of the social history of the united states with real life experiences of real people being expressed. I am sorry that Moviewhateverhisname is does not like Zinn, Since I knew Zinn years back, I can hardly call him a Communist, he just takes a different approach that fogs the minds of the ignorant.
If you get a chance to write a book on any historical character, which one would you choose, and why?
Maybe, Jhansi ki Rani, Laxmibai! She is an inspiration!
How long did it take for Stephen Hawking to write 'The Brief History of Time'?
In A Brief History of Time, Hawking writes in non-technical terms about the structure, origin, development and eventual fate of the universe which is the object of study of astronomy and modern physics.In 1982, Stephen Hawking decided to put his years of groundbreaking research in theoretical physics into book form. His goal, he said, was to “explain how far we had come in our understanding of the universe,” and how humankind might be close to finding a unified theory of the cosmos.Several years and many rewrites later, Hawking’s A Brief History of Time defied all those expectations. In 1988 he published his book .The first run sold out in the United States in a matter of days, and soon the 200-some-page account of the origin and fate of the universe was flying off the shelves worldwide. It spent 147 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list, and a record-breaking 237 weeks on the Times of London bestseller list. To date, more than 10 million copies have been sold and the book has been translated into dozens of languages.
Which AP U.S. history book is better, Princeton or Barron's?
I just finished taking APUSH and have experience with both books. Both of them have their merits however everyone around me favored the Princeton Review. Barron’s copies and elaborates on the framework outline provided by college board (in essence, this outline is everything that will be covered on the AP test and i distinctly remember multiple questions being answered on the test directly from the outline itself which is something to keep in mind). Barron’s is very wordy and you're going to need some time to read through it. Don't wait until AP week to start reviewing with Barron’s. Princeton Review is less wordy and some (including all those that I know who used it to review) say it covers exactly what you need - not too much and not too little. Barron’s certainly gave me an edge during the free response simply because it provided me so much information. For cramming, I recommend AP US History: The Essential Content from Larry Krieger (same guy that made crash course APUSH and 5 steps to a 5). I used it and it was helpful for me. Additionally, I've heard stories of people using only it to study and getting 5s. Before the school year, I would recommend looking into the APUSH youtubers and watching their videos - Adam Norris and Joczproductions were my favorites. Adam Norris also has very helpful period based study guides that aided me on the test as well. The course is rigorous but rewarding. Good luck!