What Do You Think Of Bill Clinton On A Scale Of 1 To 10

What do you think of the BBC's 1 star review of Bill Clinton and James Patterson's novel, "The President Is Missing"?

What do you think of the BBC's 1 star review of Bill Clinton and James Patterson's novel, "The President Is Missing"?Well for starters I can’t find any reference to one star. Can you clue me in to which part of the review contains the star ratings? I checked twice and couldn’t see it.Secondly - having not read the book myself I’m not really in a position to render an opinion on whether this review is accurate or not.Thirdly - there is one clue in the way the review is put together on this webpage. There are three photos from Bill Clinton’s career used. One of him and his wife during President Trump’s inauguration, one of his shaking hands with Trump during Trump’s inauguration and only one picture taken of President Clinton while he was President.Can you guess what the picture is?It’s a White House photo of Clinton with Monica Lewinsky.Which has nothing to do with the content of the book.So I would suggest that perhaps the reviewer has a certain point of view on President Clinton which may well have informed his review.

On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate the presidency of Bill Clinton?

To be fair to the various political perspectives, I went to Wikipedia to see what presidential scholars thought of Bill Clinton’s presidency. What I found is that he tends to rank in the top third of all US presidents in both scholarly an public opinion polls. So, I guess I’d say about a 7.Historical rankings of presidents of the United States - Wikipedia

How would you rate math literacy in the United States on a scale from 1 to 10?

Somewhere between a 4 and 6. I have never met more than a handful of students who hate math, think American math classes tend to be quite boring (I imagine this is true pretty much everywhere), and most importantly it is easy enough to graduate with a high school degree and learn only basic algebra and some geometry. Additionally, you do not have to be very good at either to at least get a C in the required courses.I am bad at math (I will put myself somewhere between a 5 - 6, with 7 being the beginning of truly college or near college level maths). I only did truly poor in a single math course, Honors Algebra II, and believe my grade was boosted from the 69 I earned to a 70. If this was indeed the case, it was done so I could just get my degree (my other course grades were fairly good, B+ and above). I am terrible at geometry yet did fine enough in it. My basic algebra and arithmetic are fine, I do not think a person would say I was bad at those, and my head math is alright.I rarely encounter people who have better math skills than me. Of those that do, most are college students who want to either be engineers or do something with chemistry.I think this could and should be fixed but not to the degree one might think. I truly do not think math courses above Algebra II and Geometry will come up for the vast majority of people. However, Algebra II solidifies pretty much all the high level math most people need. Geometry meanwhile I think gives you enough of a basic understanding of design and the industrial world around you that I think it is also worth requiring.We need an education system that does not allow students to skirt through these courses without knowing the material. Right now, they often can. The classes are bored, teachers get discouraged. Students fail tests that are built to make sure they know the material. The tests get made easier. I’ve seen this because I was there. Students need to be able to fail maths if we want them to learn the maths. If students cannot fail, we cannot even properly check to see which math teachers are doing a good job.Math is a hard sell. I won’t get too much into how I think to make that sell easier but, to conclude, Americans aren’t so great at math in my anecdotal opinion. I rate us a 4.5 to 6 out of 10. We tend to be numbered enough to know vaguely what change we should get when buying our cheeseburgers.

On a a scale of 1 to 10 how would you rate the honesty of MSNBC as a whole? With 10 being totally dishonest.

It has been a while since I watched MSNBC, or any network program, but when I did, I found them 98% ethical. My major issue was when Rachel Maddow ambushed a guest. The guest had written a book about curing homosexuals. But the author denied it, and she pointed out page and paragraph in his book.In truth, the book was execrable, but so was Ms Maddow's behavior.That said, she was correct, just rude.But she is scrupulous in all her presentations, she gets her facts right, she does her homework.Same is true for the rest of MSNBC staff as far as I can tell.Your scoring system seems backwards, but using it, I would give them a 2.

In a scale of 1-10, how would you rate the movie "The Nun"?

5 out of 10

On a scale of 1-10 for US Presidents, 1 being the greatest and 10 being the worst, what marks would you give to George W. Bush and William Jefferson Clinton?

I would give a 6 for both.Clinton scores for being level-headed in decision-making and loses marks for abusing his position and not checking al-Qaeda more effectively.Bush scores for his work with African, Latin American and Asian countries and loses marks for not securing Iraq after the ousting of Saddam Hussein.