What do you think about my blog's logo?
The problems I see with your logo are that it’s not a cohesive design, and relies on other people’s artwork.It’s big and cumbersome—an amalgamation of multiple styles of illustration mashed with haphazardly placed type that don’t particularly suit the design. It won’t work at multiple sizes (imagine what it would look like at a 72px X 72px icon).I know this probably seems like a harsh critique, but try no to take it as such. This is what my eyes see.My suggestion: Try simplifying it. Choose one of the things you’ve used in your concept and focus on that, and try choosing a font that also works with the design. Stick to one style of illustration.Be sure to research logos and see how they work, what makes them attractive, and how you can improve your design. Read posts about logo design and see how other designers approach their work.
What do you think about my logo?
Nobody has even bothered to ask why there are four different logos? I mean, not really four different logos, but four iterations of the same exact logo. With the exception of the green color added to 2 of them. Why, why, why are there four?Ok, so, aside from that obvious mystery, there is also the very obvious matter of the word "rainbow" and what it means, and what it conjures up in the mind's eye. Gordon has already put that question on the table, in straightforward English. So there's no need for me to do the same thing.One could argue that the two aforementioned oddities, or mysteries, may be sufficient to make your logo very interesting and effective as an attention-getting device. But someone else could argue....this is just another instance of "The Emperor's New Clothes". In other words, could this be simply a case of somewhat deliberate and random deviance, functioning as nothing more than a gimmick? Since I have no idea if this is really the case, I'll just leave that question open for others to consider.From my POV, what would make this logo work a lot better would be to have the raindrop actually displaying, in an artful way, all of the colors of the rainbow. Or, in an alternate approach, you could have the bow, which really looks more like a boomerang, displaying those banded rainbow colors. Using only gray and green for this logo seems so counterintuitive, but not in a good way.So, in conclusion, I cannot say I am a fan of this logo. However you have introduced some intriguing visual concepts. And, perhaps, you are on to something. But what you are on to is really too obscure, it's too unclear to me how this logo is appropriate for this company. If you can somehow resolve all of the problems we have raised here (Gordon and I)....that will be a great accomplishment! I don't think you can, but I wish you luck!
What do you think about this logo?
Its just a blur. you need some "movement" for marketing, use google for inspiration or use any of the cheap logo companies you find there. You got plenty of choices. https://image.freepik.com/vetore... Read this article: http://www.techsling.com/2015/07...
As a Client, What do you think of my logo?
If I were your client and this is the logo you presented, I'd hire a different designer. I wouldn't give feedback or a critique or even tell you why I didn't like it. I'd simply end the contract and hire someone else. This isn't a logo, it's an illustration—and not a good one at that. It's so many levels of terrible that I don't know were to start, except to recommend you delete every instance of it that exists and start over. The words typed in Times New Roman would be a better logo than this.Sorry to the be the bearer of bad news, but this is the worst logo I've seen presented on Quora for critique and I've seen some pretty terrible ones.
What do you think about the new Qantas logo?
I don’t think it looks all that much different from the old logo, but it somehow manages to be much more opaque regardless. Honestly, it looks like a rejected redesign for Adobe Acrobat (from several versions ago, back before all the software designers contracted some bizarre shared psychosis and decided to redesign everything to look like it was made for anal retentive preschoolers), or possibly a picture of a cheetah doing a swan dive.Still, I can appreciate the effort to distance themselves from the conventions of so-called “beautiful material design” (an oxymoron if there ever was one), even if it seems like a bit of an overreaction since their old logo wasn’t actually guilty of that particular sin against aesthetics.
When you look at this logo what do you think I sell?
Not sure there's really anything right about it. The fact that it is black says you lack imagination - that's what black always makes me think anyway. It makes a fine cocktail napkin though.
What do you think about the new Brillen Becker logo?
It really looks great. I appreciate the creativity of the designer in this logo. Specially the bright color of both sides of glasses and a yellow stand to attach both. It looks like a stylish glasses which is worn by a stylish person.The yellow stand shows the creativity of a rough line that is suddenly dropped on the paper, like a rough scratch from the marker. This would I call a professional logo design. Waiting to be more creative from time to time.
What do you think about our Logo? Is it attractive or should we change it?
It looks like your company is Clipping Path India, and your business is to create clipping paths in photoshop and edit images for clients who wants to outsource this kind of work.Clipping Path India Got a Shiny Look with a Beautiful Logo.Now that we know that...The logo is too literal. I understand why the fountain pen is in there, because thats the actual tool in photoshop you would use, but most people, including prospective clients, would have no idea why the pen is in there, and they wouldn't be able to make the connection. Your current logo is saying: "Look at us, we use the pen tool!"My suggestions is that you should try to communicate in a more abstract way that you do image editing, and that you create value for your customers through that. If photoshop change the pen tool to look like something else in the next version, your logo will make no sense whatsoever.The different gradients are odd, I don't understand why the lighter blue shape on the inside curves inwards. To be perfectly honest, the shape inside the blue circle looks like an imprint of a human butt, like someone just got up from a plastic chair on a warm day.I find it odd that you use so many gradient shapes, since your business if about editing photographs. Nothing in your logo alludes to photography. Some quick thoughts about your company:You create value by editing original images. You enhance an image by removing elements from it. Through careful editing, you make images better. Is there a way you can redesign your logo with that as an inspiration?I would drastically reduce the number of elements, both because your current logo looks too messy, and also because the core of your business is precisely to reduce the number of elements in the images you edit. It just makes sense.