Does AJ Styles hold some kind of Championship record now.....?
ever since They debuted the 'Legends' Belt AJ has called it the TV Title, if you go back to his old Promo work the first time he held it the constant renaming I think kind of cheapens the title, as it shows that TNA has no idea how to Value it... 'Legends' implies it should be for old pros, Icons or even Hall of Fame Calibre guys-- yet its been exclusively on Mid-card to upper mid card guys -- save for his 5 WCW Titles I don't classify Booker's career as Legendary... AJ will be one day, but EY and Roid Boy-- seriously and Global: the Globe is synonymous with the planet is synonymous with the World so what is the difference between Global and World so semantically it should be on par with RVD's Strap If you recall the TV Title in WCW was the lowest level singles belt, beneath the US... I think the ECW TV Title was akin to a US/IC The X factor in its Value lies in fact in The X Division Belt when TNA was properly using the X Division.. the X could be seen as Equal to the Heavyweight... and when it was less it was clearly no less impressive than than a US/IC... now the X is on Douglas Williams and being chased by Kendrick, while AJ has the TV title and no foreseeable feud - unless or until he gets kicked out of Fortune -- if it becomes the centerpiece of his issues w/ Kaz that boosts it up the scale exponentially and as you point out the moniker of TV Title is a bit of a misnomer as most titles get at least 1-2 TV defenses a year the one honor affirmed by AJ holding the strap under all 3 names is than no one can deny his "Grand Slam" Status --- but as I don't think any/many other feds have messed up the booking of a title badly enough to require 3 names for the same belt in less than 2 years i think that is a first... and if its not.. i think the fact that AJ renamed while he holds it.. he'd have to drop it and re-win it under the TV name to make it official
More people could fund and focus on things that really matter like, I don't know, addressing climate change realistically, instead of denying it, science and technology which leads to benefits for all, and perhaps our (U.S.) education system, which, quite frankly is one of the (if not the) worst in the entire modern world.That's what I just don't understand about the country I live in (again, the U.S.). We're such a great nation with amazing potential, but we just can't seem to get our shit together. I blame this mostly on right-wing religious and political nuts (like Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman just to name a couple) who pander to the voters of the all-too-common intellectually embarrassing emotionally thinking crowd.
There are no crystal balls when it comes to the NFL. It’s not uncommon for teams to jump from the back of the pack one year to being playoff contenders the next, and predicting which team will break out can be nearly impossible.That is, it can be if you’re making the picks on your own. But artificial intelligence company Unanimous A.I. believes it can produce much more accurate predictions by tapping the power of group thinking.That’s why the company created Unu, an online platform that allows people to congregate online and arrive at better answers together.“We developed a technology called artificial swarm intelligence, which is all about tapping the inherent knowledge, wisdom, intuition of groups,” Unanimous A.I. CEO Louis Rosenberg told the Daily Dot.For example, imagine a question with three answers is posed. Answer one has 40 percent support, answer two has 25 percent, and answer three has 35 percent. Voters of answer two believe their answer is correct, but can see answer one has a clear advantage. They would prefer a result of answer three to answer one, so they shift their influence to answer three, giving it enough support to win, pushing out answer one.Sources : AJ Dellinger
What do you think of RVD being the new TNA world champion?
Before i give my take on RVD winning the world title, i must say i was surprised tonight. impact has been doing horrible lately. but last night lockdown was a lot better than i thought it would be, and tonight IN MY OPINION, impact was amazing and a step up from what we have seen in the last few weeks. pushing RVD into main event status is exactly what tna needs to do, he is a legend and can draw big numbers. the match he had with jeff hardy was great, and his match with styles wasnt too bad. i hope impact stays this good but ric flair vs. abyss being announced left a bit of a question mark in my head... as for RVD being champ, like i said it is the smart thing for the company to do. they went out of their way and added jeff hardy and RVD to their roster. now to their advantage they put the world title on rob van dam which could make people want to see impact more. there is more tna needs to work on but this is a start, i love this championship ranking idea bischoff has planned, and since bischoff turned face it seems he wont be on camera as much as he wasnt on that much tonight. maybe we will see an aj styles vs. rvd rematch at sacrifice which would be great, or maybe a triple threat involving jeff hardy. as for now, tna has shown to lose faith in pope as they didnt hype up his lockdown match as much in the final weeks before impact, compared to how they were hyping it up before, and it wasnt even the main event at the ppv nor did pope even show up on impact, so my guess would be pope wont be getting a rematch. which i dont really mind anyways.
I'd be interested to know what Republicans would want to do too in such a situation, but I think we have some pretty good clues regarding what they would do with the federal government.I think Paul Ryan's budget plan is probably about ideal for Republicans, although the Republican Study Committee's budget goes farther.Some of the features of Ryan's plan:-Replace Medicare with a voucher system (to buy private insurance) starting in 2022-Raise the minimum Medicare age to 67-Turn Medicaid into a block grant program (giving the states more control)-Repeal Obamacare-Tort reform-Go from six tax brackets to two: 25 percent and 10 percent, and generally simplify the tax code-A hard cap on discretionary spendingI think Republicans would also like something along the lines of Bush's (mutually exclusive) proposals for Social Security:Plan I: Up to two percent of taxable wages could be diverted from FICA and voluntarily placed by workers into private accounts for investment in stocks, bonds, and/or mutual funds.Plan II: Up to four percent of taxable wages, up to a maximum of $1000, could be diverted from FICA and voluntarily placed by workers into private accounts for investment.Plan III: One percent of wages on top of FICA, and 2.5% diverted from FICA up to a maximum of $1000, could be voluntarily placed by workers into private accounts for investment.So basically, Republicans would significantly limit the federal government's role in Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, three of the four most expensive federal programs, alongside the military. I think Republicans generally want to keep military spending at about 4% of gdp, which is a little higher than it is now, I believe.I think Mitt Romney's campaign also provides some hints, such as:-Repeal of Dodd-Frank and Sarbanes-Oxley, replacing current banking regulators with a more "streamlined" approach-Eliminating the estate tax and AMT-Prioritizing economic development over protection of the environment-Opposition to same-sex marriage and civil unions-Opposition to abortion-Appointment of judges that advocate "judicial restraint"-Use of "enhanced interrogation"-A balanced budget amendment to the US Constitution-Support for more free trade deals-Less of a federal role in education
This somehow started in the asian scene, where girls are trying to be cuter in their selfies. well, not all look cute, it depends on how they project, and if they are cute to start with. This could only mean flirting if they wriggle their tongue in excitement like they wanna lick something or tickle something with their tongue, also look for the eye expressions, if their trying to flirt with you or just look cute.
What could AJ stand for?
Antonia Abigail Alexandra Alexandria Ava Addison Alice Adeline Aurora Juliet Jean Jane Joan Julia Jade June Jacqueline Jocelyn Jaime Jana Janet I like Antonia Jocelyn, Alice Juliet, and Alexandra Janet I hate Jayda.
If the clone is raised in a way that their identity is respected and considered a fully normal human being by their surrogate mother, family who raises them and social surroundings, then I would expect that the clone would experience as little or as much problems as any other person in this world.A clone would be just as an unique person as any other person in this world is.After all it is not possible for identical humans (or other beings) to exist since from the moment the original cell starts to duplicate little genetic changes occur because cells never copy exactly without little mistakes. When a cloned cell is taken as a starting point it will have inevitably small changes while it develops into a human. These can not be the same changes as the original person had since these changes are coincidentally or under the influence of their environment. Therefore a clone can never be identical with the person who donated the cell. In this aspect they differ not from monozygotic twins who shared the same genetic material in one fertilized cell.Besides the heritable aspects, an organism also changes under the influences of its environment: in the womb and during the rest of their life. These changes have an influence on the physical functioning and appearance of the body but als on the development of personality, intelligence, coping strategies, emotional development, skills, preferences etc.Since a clone does not develop in the same circumstances, era, womb, family etc, they will differ even more from each other than most monozygotic twins will, who shared more similar circumstances before birth and (usual) grew up in the same family, school, town, food habits, era and culture.It is to be expected that a clone will differ more from the person they was cloned from then monozygotic twins will differ from each other.