What happened AFTER the women rights movement?
After the women's rights movement came the women's advantage movement, though it's still known as feminism. Once feminists won equal rights for women in most areas, they began pushing for policies that advantaged women over men and are not equal. Advantaging women over men in hiring , under affirmative action, advantaging female owned businesses over male owned businesses, advantaging girls in school under the women's educational equity act, giving some 22-free health care services under Obamcare and raising men's premiums to pay for it, creating a council for women and girls, while blocking the same for men and boys, creating a Violence Against Women's Act despite the fact men are victims of violent crime more so than women, and of course many policies under Title ix.
What if women's rights never happened?
Oddly enough, the job market would be a lot better and salaries would be higher. Think about it. If half the workforce disappeared, companies would be in a huge bind to get people to fill jobs, which means they'd pay more, offer better benefits, etc. We'd also eat healthier, because we'd be eating home-cooked meals instead of at restaurants. Kids would probably be better educated and raised with better manners, because one parent would be dedicated to making sure they're raised properly instead of being away for 9-11 hours a day leaving parenting to a disinterested day care worker, and they'd have more time available to make sure the teachers are dong their job and hold their feet to the fire when they aren't. But women who did choose to work would be subject to a lot of pretty ugly treatment. It was common, even as recently as the late 80s and early 90s, for women to be propositioned by their bosses, so that if they wanted promotions or raises they had to... demonstrate their dedication. Sexual harassment was so common it was pretty much part of corporate culture, and women had no options beyond the stenographic pool. Obviously that kept a lot of capable and intelligent people from contributing to society to the best of their abilities. IMO, women's rights and feminism needed to happen and there's still a lot of ground to cover before men and women are equal. But there have been a lot of unanticipated casualties of the shift to two-worker households. IMO, if you have kids, one parent needs to be dedicated to parenting. I don't care which parent it is, but the longer we maintain this two-worker situation, the worse and worse **** gets with education, culture, and discipline.
In historical terms, everything after World War II is the modern era. So anything that happened from 1945 to today is modern. Some put the beginning of the modern era at an earlier point: the Civil War, or the Industrial Revolution, but eras are defined by a consensus emerging in the historiography.At some point, historians will think a new era has started — some event or huge social, economic or political change will be the signal that an old era has passed and a new era has begun. Usually this can only be seen in retrospect, as hidden or ignored facts are brought forth and interpreted. As an example, a consensus is emerging that the Enlightenment (which started in the 16th century) ended in the last quarter of the 20th century.So historical eras can overlap. Some historians have said the tech revolution of the 1980’s is such a change, and have labeled this era as the post-modern or technological age. But it takes a while for periods and events to be interpreted.It’s a part of the process of writing history for questions like this to be ironed out in scholarly journals, and eventually a consensus will emerge. That’s how history is written, it’s an interpretation of events that tell the human story.
What happened to the women's movement?
i think the political focus of the movement revolved around the passage of the equal rights amendment. when not enough states ratified the amendment in order for it to become law, i think many women became very disheartened and lost their fervor for the political process. other women became part of the political process, which is why there are at least a few women elected officials and a woman was recently able to maintain a very viable presidential campaign for the first time in history. i also think the movement lost its momentum because of its very success. women today have many more choices than ever before. and the movement was really about securing opportunity and choice for women. folks from the younger generations simply do not realize how restrictive life was before the movement. a young girl today can participate in sports in ways very few girls could before, primarily due to title 7, a by-product off the women's movement that forced schools to at least make an effort to spend money on women's sport programs. women have educational opportunities previously denied them outright, or which were so culturally disapproved for women that few were strong enough to break through. same for career opportunities. societal expectations for women prior to the movement were that she would stay home, have babies in whatever number nature provided (limited birth control), clean house and take care of husband. those that did want a career were generally restricted to nursing, teaching, or secretarial professions. women were rarely admitted into law schools and medical schools, and those that did found establishing a career in those fields a daunting task. most girls did not even consider any career, much less dream she could chose a career path, before the movement. the more astute women in the movement did not believe the stay-at-home mom was a bad choice. they simply didn't think it should be the only choice they had. today's young women can dream of becoming astronauts, astrophysicists, doctors, lawyers, and ceo's because of the women's movement. and they can continue to remain at home, have babies, and reign as domestic goddesses if they so chose. choice--a powerful and wonderful thing to have and which shouldn't be devalued because it has happily become so much more common.
Why/when did the Women's rights movement begin?
actually. there is not any documented situation with doing so as a replace of being socially ostracized. permit me ask you something besides the fact that-what are you? Irish? Norwegian? German? Are you extremely joyful including your ancestry? if so, do you already know that no race is "organic"? you spot, i ought to guess out of your till now questions and strategies which you're in the direction of it, regardless of the shown fact that at some ingredient you iced over an id in time. You determined to have have exciting with some manifestation of a race that in the time of all probability is very as much as this factor. human beings who save onto their race are pitiful, for they save onto the exterior and now not the middle. All races are the effect of intermixing and breeding, as are all languages and to an volume, even religions. human beings pass they many times take their ideals, language and of direction, genes with them. there is not any scuffling with it and scuffling with in the direction of it is going to maximum sensible consequence in misery. "The much less justified a man or woman is in claiming excellence for his very own self, the extra able he's to assert all excellence for his united states of america, his faith, his race or his holy purpose." -Eric Hoffer, from "the genuine Believer, recommendations on the character of Mass strikes" be happy with WHO you're, now not WHAT you're and you would be waiting to start to nicely known. -------------------- affraidknot- regrettably racism won't ever end besides the fact that all races coalesce top right into a single one. the fairly situation isn't plenty race, that's a ought to divide ourselves and fix ourselves to an id exterior ourselves. Race is effectively probable the main obtrusive manifestation of a substitute between 2 human beings. in short, the choose to belong is the wrongdoer. people who do not or can not gain seek that fulfillment by potential of potential of fading away top right into a corporation. In doing so no person can ingredient out their inadequacy, for they're regardless of the shown fact that an further thread in a tapestry.
What happened when women got the right to vote?
Some of the factors were the 14,15 and 16th amendments which gave citizenship rights to the freed slaves at the end of the Civil War. These amendments made discrimation based on race illegal. Women's sufferage movements gained traction because women were the only large segment of the population to not have the right to vote. During World War 1; the sufferage movements became even more vocal because when soldiers went off to fight in 1917-1918; women took on a more active role in society; simiar to the more famous work movement during World War 2 in 41-45. Two quick notes; women's sufferage movements existed in some form throughout the 19th cenutry, they were just overshadowed by the abolishionist movement up until the Civil War. Labor movements and immigration in the second half of the 19th century dominated the political landscape. The other note is that the sufferage movement was for federal elections. Several states had different local/statewide voting policies. Wyoming for instance had a female governor long before the 21st amendment which gave the women the right to vote. What would have happened if the 21st amendment was not added the constitution? That is an interesting hypothetical. Its impossible to predict because I think the rights would have been given if not in the 1920s than at somepoint later in the 20th century. Social scientists and historians do not deal with hypotheticals like that because it does not increase our understanding.
What important events in the womens rights movement happened in 1851 and 1860?
Why do you talk approximately the circulate to have been fairly useful in the '70s? The events of the '70s have been the top results of paintings that began as a techniques back through fact the '50s. between the main issues replace into Lyndon Johnson's "super Society" legislations of 'sixty 3-'sixty 4 which placed the status of the White homestead at the back of the Civil Rights circulate, and, as an factor result, gave the South to the Republicans. It replace into the momentum from that impetus that bring about the legislations of the '70s, yet additionally sparked the backlash the bring about Nixon's election and the Republicans reclaiming the White homestead. the only actual Feminist pastime unique to the '70s replace into their attempt at an equivalent Rights replace, which failed. they have been especially a lot on the sidelines in view that. How a lot fairly Feminist time table legislations has been surpassed in the final 35 years? they're generally scuffling with in simple terms shop what they have been given then, maximum fairly Roe vs. Wade, which occurred in January of 'seventy 3, and alter into nonetheless in sufficient possibility of being overturned to be a campaign element in the final election, so even which could rarely be referred to as an unqualified fulfillment.
What happened during the civil rights movement?
When I think the civil rights movement it brings to my mind Malcom X and Martin Luther King ( the one who was famous the speech "I Have a Dream") , the African-American movement (1955-1968) tht happened down South in the United States and abolishing racial discrimination against African-Americans. The Black Power Movement and Rosa Parks who started the protest, the first black woman who refused to sit at the back the the bus. She was not breaking the law by refusing to at the back of the bus and refusing to give up her seat to a white woman. The Black community were expected to sit at the back of the bus and allow a white passenger to have the front seat, and there were separate fountains with a sign "Colours and Whites", and sectioned of areas in restaurants. People just accepted it. It was a big movement back in 1963 when the Black community boycotted the bus, they were the mostly ones who rode the bus.
What did the women's rights movement accomplished?
There was no Women’s Rights Movement, as we would recognize it after the US Civil War. It would be 50+ years before that sort of organization really took place and it was interrupted, and (counterintuitively) paused by WWI. Women were finally gaining some political traction towards being treated equally (including being allowed to vote) right before WWI broke out. Then they took on superhero status by covering the lost jobs AND strengthening the arms industry, but most lost their jobs when the men returned from the most harmful war the world had ever seen, and people still weren’t thrilled to hear about “Women’s Issues” as broken came back to the job.It’s a bit of a travesty, really, and one of the only stats I know is that France wouldn’t see that number of employed women again (we’re talking about 1914–1918) until 1961.To return to America, the spirit was there, but it was quite a while (many decades) after the end of the Civil War in 1865, that a full-on, legitimate movement would take shape…