Where can those black people get proper justice for their loved one after US prosecutor or the grand jury decline to press any homicide charge on those cop due to lack of sufficient evidence?
There are no legal criminal recourses for justice in those instances where officers have used brute force leading to the deaths of people who possibly should have just been arrested. US double jeopardy laws prevent these officers from being tried twice. Civil lawsuits can be brought against theses officers for the deathes of their victims, winning won't lead to incarceration but could lead to financial gain for the families who've suffered through the loss of relatives. A civil lawsuit is also easier to win in court. O.J. Simpson is an example of someone who was acquitted of murder, but later mandated in the civil court to pay millions to the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Huberman. However just as the US criminal court systems can fail, paying out damages awarded by civil judgments can be dodged by filing bankruptcy which has notoriously occurred in many high profile, civil lawsuit cases. Sadly, when a victim or family members of victims feel that justice system has failed them, they along with public sympathizers realize how extremely unjust and unfair living in the United States can be.
How did George Zimmerman get acquitted for the charges of Trayvon Martin's death?
I watched the trial.The whole trial.If you watched it, a better question would be “How did George Zimmerman get charged with Trayvon Martin's death?”The local DA reviewed the evidence and wanted nothing to do with the case. He knew trying Zimmermann was a losing proposition. The governor brought in a special prosecutor for that purpose.The entire trial was televised from end to end to ensure that there was no secret negotiations or hidden deals. No network carried it. No network reported the trial in depth during the actual proceedings despite painting Zimmermann as a cold blooded killer and Martin as a young and innocent child.What happened in the trial?Martin's girlfriend came off as a liar who changed her story to fit whoever she was talking to.The fact that Martin was a LOT bigger than Zimmerman became an issue.The prosecutor's star witness, a resident in the neighborhood wound up being the best possible witness the defense could ask for, basically placing Martin on top of Zimmerman.Ballistic evidence backed this up.So did stains on Zimmerman, the medical evidence, and the photographs.The prosecutor had such a weak case that they did something rather unusual; they attempted to tack on a child abuse charge at the end of the trial, knowing that their murder charge wasn't going to stick. The jury found Zimmerman not guilty, all the hype that the media made about stand-your-ground amounted to nothing. The rest is history.
Adam lanza sandy hook shooter had no criminal record he was no criminal?
Hillary says until we tackle gun violence we are not doing anything. I say it's not gun violence and we could have done something and we never did. We already have criminal background checks. We need medical background checks, not for guns for employment and every thing else?