Are death certificates public record?
Yes, death certificates are used for public records. A death certificate is equally Important as birth and marriage certificate. Death certificates are really helpful for public record as a country can analyze the population of that particular country. Total Population of a country can be determined through birth and death certificate.In order to keep the record of a death certificate in the USA, one can contact vital records online. They have a secure system software which can help us to keep our all vital documents safe. You just have to register with vital records and the rest of the process is done by their professionals. They serve in more than fifty states in the USA.
Warren supreme court case.?
This is true, because of the following landmark decisions: Brown v. Board of Education 347 U.S. 483 (1954), which banned the segregation of public schools; the "one man, one vote" cases of 1962–1964, which dramatically altered the relative power of rural regions in many states; Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), which held that the Sixth Amendment required that all indigent criminal defendants receive publicly-funded counsel. The law to that point requiring the assignment of free counsel only to indigent defendants in capital cases; Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), which required that certain rights of a person interrogated while in police custody be clearly explained, including the right to an attorney (often called the "Miranda warning"). Loving v. Virginia, {388 U.S. 1} (1967), which overturned the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which had banned inter-racial marriage in the Commonwealth of Virginia. He was a republican and a former 3 times governor of california. He was appointed to the Supreme Court by D. Eisenhower.
A government question, help?
Many scholars and observers have argued that the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution has become the single most important act in all of the United States politics. a. Identify which provision of the Fourteenth Amendment was applied in one of the following Supreme Court cases. For the case you select, explain the significance of the decision in United States politics. i. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954) ii. Baker v. Carr (1952) iii. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) b. Identify which provision of the Fourteenth Amendment was applied in one of the following Supreme Court cases. For the case you select, explain the significance of the decision in United States politics. i. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) ii. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) iii. Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
What evidence do democrats have that Sri Srinivasan is a liberal?
There is no evidence that Sri Srinivasan is a liberal and there shouldn't be any evidence wherein any of the justices are liberal.There are many a times when the "liberal" Ruth Bader Ginsberg is in dissent , for example Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. which deals with the "first-sale doctrine" of the copyright act, it was Gisnberg, Scalia and Kennedy in dissent whereas the conservatives Thomas, Alito joined Breyer, Sotamayor and Kegan for the judgement. In issues of abortions, you expect the court to be split, but then again the conservatives John Paul Stevens and David Souter who were once regarded as conservatives on the Rehnquist court had been painted as liberals in their latter years even though their judicial philosophies did not change much. Also many in the academia who clerked for "conservative" judges have very liberal views (Lawrence Lessig clerked for Justice Scalia) and this should not be a deterrent for the views of the nominee.
Which is a better place to live: Switzerland or the USA?
This is one of those questions with many different possible answers. Personally, I don't like broad brush comparisons and have always resisted them. As a Swiss living abroad (Auslandschweizer) for more than forty years I have gained some insights and experiences that shape my opinion on this topic. Growing up in Zurich, I could hardly wait to leave the city which in the '60s I found a confining and stifling place. Did it mean the quality of life was bad? No, not at all, but for me the desire to discover the world outside was the goal and the desired destination was the USA.For many different reasons, I ended up living for twelve years in Japan instead and found that country at first challenging, frustrating, confusing but ultimately fascinating and perfectly enjoyable for me personally. This was due to the two rules I live by: The first is NOT to compare or judge countries and cultures but try to understand, accept and embrace their differences. After all why choose to live abroad if you expect the experience to be the same as living in your native place? The second rule was never to expect the local people to change their behavior and customs to conform to my expectations or to please me but to realize it was up to me to accept them on their terms while living amongst them.In the intervening years, having lived four years in Canada, five in the UK and the last twenty years in the USA, these personal rules have served me very well and allowed me to enjoy a very exciting and varied life and to become much more of a global citizen and a more tolerant person who believes in "vive la difference!"