If I could create a machine to teleport people anywhere in the universe at touch of a button would I become richest man alive?
Highly unlikely. If you invented something like this I assume you could also transport anyone to anywhere on this Earth (at a price of course). If so then I doubt you will be allowed to survive and the blueprints of the device would be locked away in a company vault somewhere. The only thing large companies like car manufacturers, aircraft moguls and other forms of transport companies have one thing on their mind, MONEY. If you were to invent and start using your transporter then I fear it would not be long before a contract for your assassination and getting your blueprints would be put out and it would be bye, bye to you. Poseidon
What would happen if everyone could teleport to wherever they wanted in the world, whenever they wanted?
if humans could teleport from the very start, ie we evolved such a power over other apes, we would be master hunters. teleport in, throw a spear, teleport away. we drive many species to extinction this way.cultures are more connected. unrestricted by oceans or distance, humans encounter each other far sooner. the disease apocalypse of the new world happens centuries sooner.trade is an instant thing. hunting is an instant thing.war and crime would be fast paced affairs. its a little unclear how this power could work. unrestricted by being able to teleport only to places you’ve been before/line of sight, this means teleport- battles would take palce. entire armies chasing after each other from location to location until one side gives battle.numbers and the skill level of the teleporters would be the mainn factor in war. supply lines are not required. morale is higher because of the power to teleport away and escape the fight. not to mention if you cant follow a fellow teleporter, then war and crime would be essentially “stab the guy before he escapes.”ambush tactics and scouting tactics would be paramount.borders never exist. the whole world is interconnected on a level that’s unimaginable. and since running and walking are obsolete, every teleporter is fat as hell.the ozone layer, due to cars and trains never being invented, is much healthier.
What would happen if you teleported inside a wall?
If you ask me, nothing in particular. You'd make a hole in the wall where you appear. Because really, teleporting into a wall and teleporting into air aren't entirely different.In both cases, you teleport where molecules already were (nitrogen, oxygen, etc. in one case, and wood and such in the other).Having air molecules at the density of breathable gas just superposed/inserted into every part of your body during the teleportation procedure is certainly not good for your health - probably deadly, even.So any teleportation device hoping to transport living beings would need to have some way of displacing or “deleting” all of the matter that exists in the target location right before overwriting it with the teleported object. Or only teleport into vacuum chambers, which defeats the point of the question.The wall would likely have the same fate as air. Either its matter would be displaced (in which case the wall would probably suffer an explosion of sorts), either it would be deleted (in which case there would be a human- (or whichever shape the machine is programmed to clear) shaped hole in the wall where you appear.Then, depending on your luck, the shape chosen and the thickness of the wall, you may be various degrees of stuck or suffocating with your head encased in concrete, or the building may crumble on you because you destroyed a main pillar.But in any case, you would probably survive the teleportation procedure itself.
If you could teleport back in time, what would happen if you teleport back to present of which you are teleporting while teleporting?
First, understand what time really is; time is nothing more than a measurement of movement in space. Time relates to where ‘we’ are located in space; it is based upon the revolving around our poles in a 24 hour period, orbiting the sun in 365 of those pole revolutions, our solar system spinning on the galaxy’s arm and the galaxy itself moving through space.Therefore, if one teleported back in time (per see) 100 years, they would be teleporting themselves out in space somewhere; a place the whole enchilada (earth, solar system, galaxy) was in space 100 years ago. One cannot teleport into the future either; say go 100 years out and wait for the whole enchilada to catch up to you. You will move with the expansion of the Universe also, always being that 100-year distance approximately.Real object teleportation transfers objects instantaneously to its destination, no time factor is involved (a requirement specified by Nature). This application requires technology to be at the two points for it to be beneficial. However, said one could teleport an object without any other technology involved; just where the object would end up, is anyone’s guess - anywhere in the Universe.So, to answer your question, one cannot teleport anything back in earth time (or forward) and second, if one teleported themselves without technology at the desired destination, they could end up anywhere in the entire Universe. Of course, that does not rule out the inside of the teleporter. However, considering all the points in the entire Universe, the chances of getting the teleporter are extremely small.
What happens if you teleport somebody into a wall.?
I suppose you would end up with a body full of plaster. Or maybe the atoms trying to occupy the same space would react and burst the wall apart. In any case you would surely be dead. I guess the teleporter/time machine would operate like in Terminator 2 where they transported into a bubble that vaporized the destination first. Maybe you could do that and teleport some air along with so the person would not suffocate right away. Or teleport in a protective shell with a door. If you found you were in a tight spot you could radio back and have them beam you back.???
What would you think would have happened if Hitler had the first atomic bomb technology?!?
provided that the two Germany and the U. S. have been engaged on the A-bomb, Germany could only have had if first, decrease than your situation. that should mean there'd be a nuclear conflict between the two powers, set off off probable with the help of the atomic bombing of the united kingdom. the two Germany and the U. S. could probable have equivalent bomb-making skill, however the U. S. could have extra territory for Germany to bomb. that should place the U. S. at an benefit in a conflict that should wreak huge harm on the two worldwide places. Whoever ought to dominate the sea could benefit a atrategic benefit, as a results of fact the bombers could probable could desire to be changed to have the means to take off from vendors with their payload from places closer to land. German rockets lack the gap and shipment-bearing skill to hold A-bombs. One risk could be that the conflict could lead to a standoff, with the two worldwide places overwhelmed with the devastation. that should enable Germany to maintain a minimum of countless the territory it had conquered. All this could motivate Russia into getting its own atomic weaponry speedier than it could have. the U. S. could are turning out to be an best chum of Russia's to cut back German impact. A key result could have been a warmer chilly conflict than we experienced interior the final a million/2 of the 20 th Century.
What would happen if the U.S. actually deported all African-Americans to Africa?
Well Matthew Culbertson if there were no black folks around ?Whites would have no one to blame but themselves for the crime that occurred;No one to blame but themselves when they didn’t get the jobs they wanted;No one to blame but themselves when their lives turned out to be less than they’d expected.Many white people (Not all) need black people, especially in a inferior role, as a way to build themselves up, and provide a sense of self-worth they otherwise lack.Look at historyEven when black people have been nowhere near whites, live in a separate town,city, state. whites still aren’t satisfiedRosewood in the early part of the last century ?This was a thriving black community. This was living independent of whites but it was burned to the ground by white supremacists.Not 2 mention Bruce’s Beach, Black Wall Street, Bronzeville in Chicago and Black Baltimore during the days of sailing ships all show a pattern of White officials making extraordinary efforts to cut black business development off at the knees.Black degradation is essential 2 White supremacists.Thriving Black business districts and countries and strong Black communities would expose the lie at the heart of White Supremacy ideology.The Tulsa Riot in the early part of the last century.Same again. Thriving black community. Blew up by white ppl with the aid of the US government.When you talk about Black economic empowerment, development and self improvement. It is not as if Black people have not shown ourselves to be more than capable of achieving this. The fact is we have always been prevented.This aspect does not only apply to America it applies on a global scale too. Its not just Black communities which have been prevented from organically growing and developing. Its countries and states too. Africa is still under white western control.Growth of ones own country can't happen in isolation. It has to be within an agreed shared global structure which includes everyone. While the ideology and controlling structure of white supremacy remains firmly in place, restrictions will ultimately always apply to black nations.
If teleportation becomes a mode of transportation how will it be monetized and regulated in terms of immigration etc?
First, since I am working on teleportation, and have a patent applied for I believe real object teleportation is a natural phenomenon just like quantum teleportation’s entanglement. Real teleportation is almost identical to our ‘cut n paste’ we are doing on our technology. With that said it is nothing like Star Trek. It requires technology to initiate it, technology to control it, and technology to terminate it (leastwise first generation teleporting). If one wants to teleport objects they would need a Teleporter (initiation technology), a Landing Zone (termination technology), and the Internet (control technology) for communication between initiate & terminate to ensure safe and reliable transfers through space instantaneously. So how would teleporting be integrated into our culture without an economic relapse? We would need to control who owns Teleporters; these being extremely expensive and very sensitive initially, so probably just leased versus being sold. They would be leased to the individual industries of transportation and let them integrate teleporting into their respective revenue paths. Eventually,it will erode the job market immensely, so to offset this we need another event to happen. At the end of the Civil War the army personnel returned to the private sector and there was no jobs. Horace Greeley wrote in the newspaper ‘Go West young man; build a new frontier’. We need a new frontier, and that frontier is space. Teleporting will replace many jobs, however, it also can create new opportunities also. As far as the monetized, regulation, immigration, etc. these things over time will be sorted out by the respective parties concerned with the new technology integration. The automobile, telephone, etc. did not revolutionize the world overnite.
What's so dangerous about teleporting?
It is dangerous because of: 1) There is no proof that it has ever been done. 2) The idea is to: a) break all your atoms down into energy b) then move the energy over c) turn the energy back into matter it is unknown, at least in science, how to do 2(a) or 2(c). Never been done except for a very few sub atomic particles with no consideration of positioning things. Assuming all the above can be overcome, other problems will be: - any error in the positioning of atoms could be terrible. - what about a loss of energy? This often happens in transmission of energy in the ways we know how to do it. - etc. Basically, it is an interesting idea but requires science extremely advanced compared to what we have and so it doesn't even make sense to talk of it being dangerous. It is just a pipe dream with no basis in reality.
If we were to build a teleport in the future where one man would go into and two men would come out of, which one would the original man be and why?
My project and patent based upon Niels Bohr’s non-local source containing all the information for an individual (both physical and non-physical). This information exists outside our three dimensional world and is, in effect, transmitted into our world through a 4th spatial dimension outlined in Einstein’s unified field theories. The project’s first milestone is to prove this scenario. Real teleportation duplicates the ‘cut n paste’ application we are performing on our technology screens today. Only one copy of any object ever exists in nature (either physical or non-physical). We cannot even have the same exact thoughts, primarily because none of us had the exact same experiences. Even when one does a ‘copy n paste’ two separate copies exist; deleting one does not delete both.Maybe it could happen using current scientific thinking of the science fiction ‘Star Trek’ methodology, however this fiction and will never be developed into reality.