Can japan declare war on another country or attack another country without permission?
Japan would hardly want to attack the US now.You created it in your image,but Japan is a sovereign state. I think there is a US base on Japan they have asked you to remove.They are going to get North korea onto you if you wont!
Is it ever okay for a country to attack another country?
While this has occurred thruout human history (With most attacks and wars being by the United States in the last two generations), it is only justified when a country is defending itself from imminent peril or trying to save another country from being victimized by horrific aggression.In other words, the vast majority of war invasions since after World War II were NOT justified, but simply wars of aggression and conquest. That doesn’t stop the aggressors from lying about their motives, not stop many naive citizens from believing those lies.Ever notice how oil rich countries seem to be victims of aggression far, far more than poor countries without important resources?
Why dont america attack countries like Russia,china,India?
because they are bullies that only pick fights that they know they can win
Has there ever been an unprovoked attack by one country on another that was justified and benefitted the attacker?
None I am aware of but I am sure when Israeli propagandist find this question they will weigh in. Israel was not attacked in 67 they used an excuse to get access to fresh water and farmland.In Israeli Prime Minister Moshe Sharatt's personal diaries, there is an excerpt from May of 1955 in which he quotes Moshe Dayan as follows: "[Israel] must see the sword as the main, if not the only, instrument with which to keep its morale high and to retain its moral tension. Toward this end it may, no—it must—invent dangers, and to do this it must adopt the method of provocation-and-revenge...And above all—let us hope for a new war with the Arab countries, so that we may finally get rid of our troubles and acquire our space." Quoted in Livia Rokach, "Israel's Sacred Terrorism.""I do not think Nasser wanted war. The two divisions he sent to The Sinai would not have been sufficient to launch an offensive war. He knew it and we knew it." Yitzhak Rabin, Israel's Chief of Staff in 1967, in Le Monde, 2/28/68"Moshe Dayan, the celebrated commander who, as Defense Minister in 1967, gave the order to conquer the Golan...[said] many of the firefights with the Syrians were deliberately provoked by Israel, and the kibbutz residents who pressed the Government to take the Golan Heights did so less for security than for the farmland...[Dayan stated] 'They didn't even try to hide their greed for the land...We would send a tractor to plow some area where it wasn't possible to do anything, in the demilitarized area, and knew in advance that the Syrians would start to shoot. If they didn't shoot, we would tell the tractor to advance further, until in the end the Syrians would get annoyed and shoot.And then we would use artillery and later the air force also, and that's how it was...The Syrians, on the fourth day of the war, were not a threat to us.'" The New York Times, May 11, 1997
Is a country justified in waging war with other nations, if their own nation is at war with itself ?
No. As long as wholesale animal slaughter is permitted to go on by our government for the mere satisfaction of our tongue (palate) we must bear the immense negative consequences. The material world is itself a place always full of anxieties, and by encouraging animal slaughter the whole atmosphere becomes polluted more and more by war, pestilence, famine and many other unwanted calamities. People in general are under the mistaken impression that animals do not feel pain, while being cut to pieces on the chopping block alive! These very same people that are tightly bound up by the mode of ignorance must accept the brunt of receiving a similar reaction. That is the law of karma. The animal killers do not know that in the future the animal will have a body suitable to kill them. That is the law of nature. In human society, if one kills a man he has to be hanged. That is the law of the state. Because of ignorance, people do not perceive that there is a complete state controlled by the Supreme Lord. Every living creature is a son or daughter of the Supreme Lord, and He does not tolerate even an ant's being killed. One has to pay for it. So indulgence in animal killing for the taste of the tongue is the grossest kind of ignorance. A human being has no need to kill animals, because God has supplied so many nice palatable foodstuffs. If one indulges in meat-eating anyway, it is to be understood that he is acting in dire ignorance and is making his future very dark. Of all kinds of animal killing, the killing of cows is most vicious because the cow gives us all kinds of pleasure by supplying milk. Cow slaughter is an act of the grossest type of ignorance. Hence a country populated with 95% meat eaters must suffer severely, sooner or later. There is simply no escaping.