How do I stop being so jealous when my boyfriend looks at other women?
So first I'll say that I'm a straight guy. I was married for 10 years and never once strayed. I had this chance with this smokeshow of a woman once, and I had to physically remove her hands from my ass. I'm not bragging, just a fact. My God she was so hot. I wanted to see her naked so badly. I wanted to time travel back to when I was single and just spend a week banging this girl.But I didn't. I wanted to. I wasn't worried about getting caught. It would have been a perfect crime. I didn't because I loved my wife more than anything. My loyal, loving, gorgeous wife. I could never dishonor her like that, I could never respect myself if I hurt her that way just so I could conquer new territory and have 20, (exaggerating,) minutes of pleasure.So here's the thing. Here's the answer to your question. Even if you are the hottest woman alive. Hot like Angelina Jolie from girl interrupted, your guy will still look at every attractive, and most unattractive women, every chance he gets.It's a defect of our species. It has nothing to do with you at all. I do it completely involuntarily. I'm single now and I don't look at more women than when I was married. I look at exactly the same amount. I want to bang just about every one of them too. But even though I'm single, I still completely forget almost every hot woman I see within about 5 seconds.Know who I'm not going to forget though? The woman that actually mattered to me. She was beautiful, caring, and more than anything, she was the person I chose. You need to understand that if you're the person your guy has chosen, then it doesn't matter where he looks, because each time he looks and takes no action, he's affirming his choice. His choice is you.
Has feminism ruined the quality of American women?
Has feminism ruined the quality of American women?Well, let’s just start and end with this question. No, it hasn’t ruined all American women—just the faux feminists who cherry pick—and who proclaim to be feminists in order to live out a traditional agenda, in which they are dependent on men. These women are tradcons in liberals’ clothing, so it’s no wonder men are confused when they get screwed over by a purported ���feminist”.An independent woman is of high value to her man. She works and contributes. She has her own health insurance and her own retirement plan. She doesn’t need him as a financial safety net for herself or for her children. If her husband died, she could adequately support the entire family. How many women do you know like that? This is what true feminism looks like.I think that a lot of men fear so-called “feminists” (cherry-picking feminists, that is) because they are afraid that these women will use feminism as a reason to divorce them, take half of everything they own, oh, and take the kids, too. This is not what a real feminist would do, but many do it anyway to live “independent” from men. Mmm, not really. That’s working the legal system, and a big reason to do away with community property laws, as many progressive European countries have done.Third-wave feminists (faux feminists, to my mind) argue that if a woman chooses to marry for security (money) and not pursue a career of her own independent of a man, she is still a feminist … you know, because she chooses it. However, I disagree. Tradcons are not feminists. A SAHM is not a feminist.Now, it’s okay to marry a man for his earning potential, or for his money, as long as the man agrees to this and knows going into it that the success of their marriage is dependent on his success as a provider. If a man signs up for this, he gets what he gets. Again: any woman who makes that choice is not a feminist. Any woman, during the course of a divorce, who tries to gain primary or sole custody of the children is also not a feminist.Don’t fear women who can live independently of men—if such a woman chooses you, that means that she adores you for you, and not because of your career or bank account. You could be dirt poor, and she’d still be around. That’s feminism, in my book.