Where I Can Find Movies Pack Of 007 James Bond

Who is the best James Bond and what is his best Bond film?

I have seen every James Bond movie in the theater as they came out.  I love Bond movies, the heavy string guitar theme, the women, the gadgets, the excitement, and especially the bad guys.  But what I have come to understand is that each Bond, and each Bond movie is a representation of the times in which that movie was made. In effect it was a mirror of society's expectations of that particular snapshot in time.  When I watched each movie I watched as a product of the time in which I lived.  Bond movies were leading edge in terms of technology and story lines, but when I look back on the old movies I see them with the experienced eye of a more worldly movie goer. To compare the original Bond to to the current Bond is like comparing Joe Namath to Joe Montana, both great for their time, but each with different skill sets.   Both were great for their times.  I refuse to rank the various Bonds, because to do so would be to lie to you and myself, for each Bond was great in that moment in which I watched him kiss the girl, or escape death by a hairs breath.  By saying one is better than the other would be to diminish the memory of the original movie going experience.   Now having said that Daniel Craig is my favorite, not because he is better than Pierce Brosnan, but because Craig most represents my current idealization of a super Bond spy.  I look forward to Daniel's next movie with the same anticipation as I did for Sean Connery or Roger Moore.  "No Mr. Bond...I expect you to die." But Bond lives on, and through him so do I, precariously.  I can be Bond for a few minutes every few years when the new movie premieres, which gives me a reason to live just a little longer.  I will live for as long as James Bond returns to save the girl, and the world. Hopefully for many years to come....metaphorically speaking that is.....

Why did they kill the woman M in James Bond?

Skyfall is meant to be a new origin story for James Bond. That's why we get more backstory about the actual person than we've ever had before. It's essentially resetting the James Bond franchise so that we can start from the beginning without having to answer too many difficult questions, like “shouldn't 007 be 80 years old by now?”If you've seen any of the old Bond movies, you'll know that the original M way back in the day was a man. Judi Dench took over starting with 1995's Goldeneye. They kept her, but it didn't really make sense with the continuity they were trying to build (i.e. the Daniel Craig movies were some of the first missions of James Bond's career).So Judi Dench as M was killed, Moneypenny as a character was introduced, and Ralph Fiennes took on the role of M, all to take us back to the beginning of James Bond as we know it. It was very, very cool for people watching it in theaters who were familiar with the original Bond movies. There was applause at the Moneypenny and Fiennes reveals when I went.I think it was a smart move, though I feel bad for Dench. She reportedly was very reluctant to go. But Skyfall did a great service to her character.In the same vein, Spectre, though not as good of a movie, had a ton of callbacks to old James Bond films. The Aston-Martin, the jet-pack…it was really, really awesome and brought James Bond full circle.Now the producers, writers, and directors are free to go wherever they want with Bond's story, thanks to Skyfall’s retconning.

Is Daniel Craig on his way to becoming the worst James Bond of all-time?

It kind of depends on what you want Bond to be.A lot of people think fondly of Roger Moore’s Bond, but his Bond teetered on the edge of farce — camp humor laden with innuendos and double entendres, increasingly ridiculous gadgets, that recurring redneck American sheriff… If you wanted a “serious” Bond, Moore kinda sucked.A lot of people like Timothy Dalton’s Bond for bringing back a more serious tone, and Dalton himself is probably the best actor to play the part, but there was something missing in the charisma department — he never really captured the whole international man of mystery thing. He mumbled most of his lines, he’s a good-looking guy, but not in the classic granite-jaw way Connery and Moore were… if you were a fan of the debonair playboy Bond, Dalton was kind of lacking.Brosnan feels kind of like a compromise between Moore and Dalton’s Bonds. He wasn’t quite as campy as Moore, but there was still a bit of a throwback to the sillier elements of the franchise. He could do the charming thing pretty well, though he felt kinda scrawny in fight scenes, like a stiff wind would knock him over. I’m not sure there’s a lot of people pushing for Brosnan as either the best or the worst… he was just kinda… there.Lazenby only did one movie. Where do you place him in the hierarchy?People generally give Connery a pass as the guy who originated the character, but even he mailed in Diamonds Are Forever.So Craig… my personal take is that he’s good at the character he’s being asked to play, but that they didn’t really have a vision for what they wanted to do with the character after Casino Royale, and they’ve been copying off Jason Bourne’s paper since then. It’s not bad, exactly, but it’s not totally Bond either.

What is your favourite James Bond scene?

This is a tough question for me because I’ve never been fond of the James Bond character himself, but definitely a fan of the films.I find Bond hard to stomach, but there are a few times where I actually think, “okay Bond, you win, you’re okay.”Sometimes these scenes are in terrible films. Sometimes they are in great films.But, I rather like this scene (my favorite Bond, and my favorite M, and my favorite Bond film[1]).Because oddly enough this scene has the best dialogue I’ve ever heard in an action film.[2]If you’re too busy to watch the clip, then let me say that the reason why this is my favorite scene is because it touches on the core of what the whole James Bond franchise is really about whilst illustrating it in one of the most (if not the most) important relationship in the entire series: saving the world through espionage and not dying needlessly in the process.M explains to Bond that while she understands Bond’s personal vendetta against a certain character, allowing him to go after someone at the sake of jeopardizing the mission was lunacy.Bond, uncharacteristically, immediately backs down and respects this. He is far from a match for M, and this speaks positively about Bond (an otherwise arrogant character) and the amount at which he is willing to bend his own misplaced pride, and personal baggage and respect the duty he signed up for.Great scene. Great actors both Dench, and Brosnan.Footnotes[1] GoldenEye - Wikipedia[2] A sexist, misogynist dinosaur.. A relic of the Cold War [James Bond Essentials]

James Bond 007 (creative franchise): What was Q's most advanced and realistic invention?

Adaptive camouflage. Not exactly like the kind found in Die Another Day that turned Bond's Aston Martin (car company) Vanquish into the "Vanish" but it is getting there. Q explains:Tiny cameras on all sides project the image they see on to a light emitting polymer skin on the opposite side.A few defense contractors and other civilian projects have centered around developing working adaptive camouflage systems for years but they aren't quite at the 2002 Bond film's level, yet.Here is a Mercedes' Benz B-Class on "display" in Germany.Mercedes' engineers draped the driver side with tiny LED screens and positioned a camera on the passenger side. The live images were then displayed on the LEDs, completing the effect. [1]BAE Systems has been developing Adaptiv, an infrared adaptive camouflage system for a few years now.The system combines sheets of lightweight, hexagonal metallic ‘pixels’ designed to change temperature very rapidly presenting a thermal pattern that optimally blends with its surrounding. Each electrically powered pixel is individually heated or cooled using commercially available semi-conducting technology. [2]Also, this video from back in 2006 shows an interesting project that was being done at the University of Tokyo.A computer processes the background imagery and relays it to a projector that filters through a half mirror and projects the scene onto the wearer. From a certain angle, the cloaked person looks transparent to onlookers. [3]An update on this technology out of Japan: _____________________________________________________________________[1] http://news.charlesayoub.com/sec... [2] http://defense-update.com/201109... [3] http://www.tokyotimes.com/2012/j...