TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

Which Criminal Is More Despicable

What are some non-prisonable crimes?

DRUNK IN PUBLIC! I got one and didn't go to jail. There's a difference between jail and prison you know., Prison is 'hard time' and jail is an overnight stay at the concrete hotel. DUI, Public Intox, Wreckless driving, suspended license, domestic disputes, minor assault charges, all those things will land you in jail for a night. Murder and robbery, auto tht, Those will get you sent to prison. I would just walk up and fart in a cop's face. They'll take you straight to jail for that!

Why are there so many crimes being commited by despicable humans all around the World?

Because they don’t care other people, only their own selfish and twisted desires/fantasies. Most of them learned to be cruel, cold and brutal; they were never taught to respect other people and life itself. This also applies to being raised to hate other people, which is something we should never introduce to children.Crimes made against a child and/or innocent people, isn’t done out of necessity. Either the criminal has a serious addiction problem, mental illness, a previous victim themselves or just wants to live a sick fantasy. All of it stems from learned behavior and what happens from early childhood to about age 25.With that said, the only thing that prevents future atrocities, is keeping our children aware of what is right or wrong and to appreciate life. That, or having an equal or greater measure of force/strategy to prevent a person or people from being harmed.As for mental illness, that requires a tighter oversight on anyone that shows indications of threatening or violent behavior. Which is barely even handled well in developing nations let alone in any 1st world countries.

What criminals are the most hated?

Child abusers and child murders and child rapists. Almost all the Judges have a pre conceived notion or an anger as soon they hear of a crime against a child and if that happens to be against a girl child for rape or molestation, God save your client. Almost immediately, the bail/anti bail will be rejected. In case of criminal appeals when all the facts are laid out before the Judges, His Lordships may look at the matter with a neutral view but usually these crime are considered to be heinous and any lawyer appearing on behalf of such clients has to be ready to face the wrath of the Judges.On one hand, the Court’s attitutide speaks good about the society on the other hand, many a false cases specially of molestation are filed in villages for petty land matters. The Judge who in most cases has been a practising lawyer knows how to separate the grain from the chaff and makes his decision accordingly but many a Judges come down heavily on the lawyer and there’s a lot of hesitant eyes when such a matter is taken up by a respected lawyer.

Which SS division was the most despicable?

I have never heard of the 36th Waffen SS Grenadier Division, and to argue their selection as response to this question is an exercise in futility..However,I have to put in “my hat into the ring” for this one, and the hat would bear the colors of the SS Totenkopf (Death’s Head) Division…the 3rd SS Panzer Division Totenkopf . Their behavior on the battlefield was atrocious, this can not be denied, but do consider that the roster of this division was levied from the guards atthe Concentration camps…In the early days of the war this unit had been involved in multiple massacres of Polish civilians, political leaders and prisoners of war. While it would be hard pressed to be compared with the 36th, but I still felt it worthwhile mention this unit.On 27 May, the 4 Company of the Totenkopf under the command of Hauptsturmführer Fritz Knöchlein, committed the Le Paradis massacre, where 97 captured men of the 2nd Battalion, Royal Norfolk Regiment were machine-gunned after surrendering, with survivors killed with bayonets. Two men survived further. It took place at a time when the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) was attempting to retreat through the Pas-de-Calais region during the Battle of Dunkirk.It arrived inWłocławek on 22 September 1939 and embarked on a four-day "Jewish action" that included the burning of synagogues and the execution en-masse of the leaders of the Jewish community.ände troops formed the core of the 3 Totenkopf Division, of which Eicke became the commander.[1

Stare decisis Criminal Justice?

It's referring to precedents. Precedents are previous decisions of the court that need to be followed by courts in the same or lower in the hierarchy. The court must give consideration but there is no rule on how it should apply it to the facts of the case at hand

Are there any crimes that are unforgivable?

I’d say so. There are crimes which are monstrous, despicable and inhumane. Many of these are simply unforgivable.By unforgivable, I mean (a)the person was guilty of the crime and (b) served prison time for his crime but (c) can never be trusted or forgiven for what he/she did because of the nature of the crime.For example: A man who rapes an infant child. There is no sympathy or compassion for him. His act is “unspeakable” and just despicable.Raping, torturing or murdering children is unforgivable.So is raping, torturing or murdering a helpless person, such as an elderly woman or a pensioner recovering from surgery.Forcing someone to watch you kill/maim/torture one of their loved ones to inflict emotional pain on the watcher.Cannibalism that’s not based on surviving starvation, but by choice.Willful mass murder. Whether that’s by deliberate act such as bombing or shooting people or by gross negligence.The killing and/or torturing of animals for sadistic pleasure. This is where someone kills pets or other animals by setting fire to them or killing them for their own gratification.Those who acquire a position of trust only so they can swindle others out of what they have. E.g. a caretaker who robs their client of their savings or their home. The financial consultant who swindles the elderly, widows and others out of their money or homes to line his own pockets.For most of the above, I think when there is no question the person is guilty, a firing squad should be readied within about 3 days to perform their duty. For the others who are guilty, letting them escape from the transport helicopter at 9,000 feet works for me.

Why do I find it a lot more despicable and reprehensible when a crime or wrongdoing is committed by someone powerful and privileged?

I think a lot of people feel exactly as you do. I do also, although perhaps not quite as strongly as you do. For me, it is that they have no excuse. They have power and privilege. That generally means that they are financially better off than most in their society. So, again, what is their excuse? I worked in a public defender’s office, full-time, for a number of years. Client after client had horrendous things happen to them when they were growing up. Physical, sexual, and psychological abuse where almost the norm. Many were brought up in families that were criminal. Others were in minority groups that were preyed upon, leading to the children joining gangs. Some were abandoned. Many have had untreated mental disorders that have lead them to be homeless. And then I read about some privileged person fixing prices in their business or other fraudulent conduct and I have no sympathy for them. Or some son of a wealthy family gets arrested for rape and everyone is so sympathetic. Please don’t destroy his life! Lock them up for years is my opinion.

Special criminal law on IT's summary?

1 Copyright © 2004 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. LexisNexis Capsule Summary Criminal Law Chapter 1 THEORY, SOURCES, AND LIMITATIONS OF CRIMINAL LAW § 1.01 Theories of Criminal Punishment [A] Utilitarianism [1] Deterrence - The utilitarian theory is essentially one of deterrence - punishment is justifiable if, but only if, it is expected to result in a reduction of crime. Punishment must be proportional to the crime, i.e., that punishment be inflicted in the amount required (but no more than is required) to satisfy utilitarian crime prevention goals. Utilitarians consider the effect of a form of punishment in terms of both general deterrence and specific (or individual) deterrence. When the goal is general deterrence , punishment is imposed in order to dissuade the community at large to forego criminal conduct in the future. When the goal is specific deterrence , punishment is meant to deter future misconduct by an individual defendant by both preventing him from committing crimes against society during the period of his incarceration ( incapacitation ), and reinforcing to him the consequences of future crimes ( intimidation ). [2] Rehabilitation - Another form of utilitarianism is rehabilitation (or reform). Examples of rehabilitative "punishment" include: psychiatric care, therapy for drug addiction, or academic or vocational training. [B] Retributivism - Under a retributive theory of penal law, a convicted defendant is punished simply because he deserves it. There is no exterior motive such as deterring others from crime or protecting society - here the goal is to make the defendant suffer in order to pay for his crime. Retributive theory assigns punishment on a proportional basis so that crimes that cause greater harm or are committed with a higher degree of culpability (e.g., intentional versus negligent) receive more severe punishment than lesser criminal activity. [C] Denunciation (Expressive Theory) - The denunciation theory - which holds that punishment is justified as a means of expressing society's condemnation of a crime - has both utilitarian and retributive components. Under a utilitarian theory, denunciation is desirable because it educates individuals that the community considers specific conduct improper, channels community anger away from personal vengeance, and serves to maintain social cohesion. Under a retributive theory, denunciation serves to punish the defendant by stigmatizing him. }{

TRENDING NEWS