Which of these two logos is better and why?
Agree for the most part with Asa Sherrill on this one. Too much going on in both cases. Your keyword here is going to be, "simplify."Before we even get to the letter forms:The laurels are awkward and constricting. If they aren't part of your client's ask, or if they aren't completely necessary, I'd get rid of them. Both designs are immensely improved simply by removing the laurels. If they are necessary, you need to rework the letter forms so they fit more comfortably in the circular space within the laurel.The colors do not compliment one another. Black, purple/maroon and green, all pretty dark...they're just fighting each other rather than enhancing one another. Try working just in black and white, at least at first, and only add color where you think it enhances the design.Now the letters:Again, we need to focus on simplification and harmony. If the animal figures are significant to the brand, I would recommend giving them a bit more reverential treatment. Whether they are or not, they look like they've just been picked out of a kitschy, gimmick typeface. Draw them by hand, preferably, and in such a way that they form a cohesive composition when they stand together. As for number 2, that Rosewood typeface is a very recognizable one that screams, "MS Word," pretty loudly. I do like how you've pushed them together to make a cohesive form, though, so play off that idea, maybe with a simpler, cleaner typeface. Again, if you want to do something embellished (looking at those interior decorative elements in the Rosewood type), it's best to do that yourself by hand or in Illustrator rather than letting a font do the design for you.Sorry for the harsh criticism. Hope it helps to get these concepts developed into something great! The instincts here are good, but there needs to be some more diligence, neatness and control.
What's the difference between these two sentences, "You are looking beautiful in this dress." and "The dress is looking beautiful on you."
In the first sentence, "You are looking beautiful in this dress", you mean that you're looking beautiful because you're wearing this dress. Whereas in the second sentence, "The dress is looking beautiful on you", you mean that you are beautiful and even the dress looks beautiful because YOU'RE wearing itHope it helps :D
Who is better looking( eminem or shemar moore)?
which one of these guys do you guys think is better looking beetween these two. i think shemar moore looks way better. if you dont know shemar then look him up on yahoo pictures. im assuming you all know eminem.
Do guys look better in baggy/loose jeans, or snug/fitted jeans?
baggy saggers
Do these two males look alike?
first pic is of Nick carter and the other pic michael cassidy http://s486.photobucket.com/albums/rr224/purplebsg18/?action=view¤t=nick_carter.jpg http://s486.photobucket.com/albums/rr224/purplebsg18/?action=view¤t=md.jpg http://s486.photobucket.com/albums/rr224/purplebsg18/?action=view¤t=hidden-palms-cassidy13.jpg they kind of look alike dont they?
Which country has better looking gals, thailand or vietnam?
Beauty is subjective. And if you can make up you mind on decision, it doesn't mean you'll get them.
Why do I look weird in photos but good looking in the mirror?
Normally our face is not symatrical. Thus if you divide your face into two halfs vertically, the left side will not exactly identical as your right side. Sometimes it's the eyes, one eye is smaller than other. Lips as well will not be identical. On top of that, sometimes, the face is slightly tilted towards one end. In normal circumstances, these differences are not easily seen when you see yourself in a mirror or photograph. Very few individuals have an exact symmetrical face.The only image of our own self that we all are accustomed to see is the mirror image. This is because you see this image at least thrice a day. This not exactly how you look. Its a mirror image of yourself. In reality you look slightly different.Attached are the two images of Barack Obama. Both are the same images the only difference is that one image is flipped vertically.Image 1 is how we all are used to see him. Image 2 is how he is used to see himself.As you see both images are of the same person but look so different when they are flipped vertically..No coming back to your question , the same thing is applicable to you as well normally you see yourself in the mirror. Thus you identify yourself with that image.When you see your photos these are the images which are flipped vertically. This is not how your image is registered in your brain. Thus making you feel that you look different.So there is nothing weird in the way you look in reality. The only thing is that you are not accustomed to that look of your own self.Try clicking your picture and keep both of them side by side. Let one be the normal picture and the other one be flipped vertically.You will come to know the difference in your face symmetry.