Which Is Better Would You Say

Which one would you say is better for CRM software? Hubspot or Salesforce and why?

I would like to start this answer with a question. Why have you highlighted Hubspot and SalesForce out of the 400+ CRM technology solutions? There are solutions cheaper than these and there are many that are more expensive.I do not believe that anyone from outside your organisation can answer this question with only the information that you have provided. For sure, many people will have an opinion, but they will not be providing you with a meaningful answer - just peddling their opinion.To answer this question in a way that is meaningful for you and the organisation (or small business) into which you will may implement it you need to understand, and articulate, your requirements. Once you know your requirements, you can make a realistic decision between the possible technologies. This exercise may also highlight that some of the other 400+ CRM technologies are actually more suitable for you.The reason that a CRM, or similar, project fails is rarely because the wrong technology was selected. Failures are caused by human factors. My recent ebook ‘Five fundamentals of a foolproof CRM implementation strategy’ explains what you need to know to make your CRM project one of the minority of success stories. You can download it free from Five Fundamentals of a Foolproof CRM Implementation Strategy .When you are looking at return on investment for any project such as this, there are five areas to consider:HardwareSoftwareImplementationTrainingSupportI have written about this at Calculating Total Project Cost For Your Software Implementation .Although I personally focus my expertise on Microsoft Dynamics 365, I write frequently about various aspects of general CRM and how to make it successful for you on our blog .0 UpvotesShare

Would you say that you have changed for the better or worse & if so, why?

I would say that I have changed for the better because I am older now than say ten years ago. Ten years ago also, Quora wasn’t around and so there had to be other ways to share and teach knowledge and wisdom. Maybe like Wikipedia (when it was a baby or toddler!) Even twenty years ago was worse! I had the school library and our own encyclopedia collection to rely on for knowledge! I did not know how to properly cite a link until 13 or 14 years old or even older. I have learned quite a lot in my 34 years on this earth and I am learning a lot more now that the internet and especially quora is available! Quora has helped me a lot if you can tell. The only thing I don’t like are the upvotes. They make me feel bad sometimes because I don’t even up getting a lot some times lol but whatever, I can’t control that. I know better now too because I have learned so much. I make better life decisions now and with confidence! Still, not everything in this life I was able to acquire but if it’s anything, I am still alive! … I have an associate’s degree I got in 2007 in communications. I have experienced being in love. I also got my driver’s license when I was 17 and got m driver’s permit when I turned 15 1/2 in 1999. There’s been many many more accomplishments but I am too tired to list them all haha. Good luck :-)Edit: oh and the job thing. I have had lots of experience in my jobs.

Is it better to ask out a girl by saying "we should go out together sometime" instead of saying "will you go out with me"?

Neither. Do not approach a woman from a position of weakness begging her to honor you with her attention - that sends the signal that you are of lesser worth. Instead approach from a position of parity, honesty and genuineness. Tell her what qualities of hers that you find attractive and specifically WHY you find them attractive - most probably because they relate to some quality of yourself - so use that as a way to tell her a little bit about yourself. This should spark a small bit of conversation. Something like “I see you’re reading ‘Moby Dick’…I’ll bet you’re a literature major at [nearby university]. Do you have aspirations of correcting this generations improper use of contractions? Please say yes! I have to say that I’m a big fan of English Lit myself and honestly I’m a real sucker for intelligent women and I’ve always had a thing for English majors…sadly it has not worked out in my favor.”Follow this with an invitation to meet up sometime. This can either be a concrete “Hey….there’s an ice skating place nearby - what’s say we go ice skating sometime? How’s next Thursday sound?” or it can be an open ended request for the phone number using a false time constraint. “Hey - I have to go but I think you look cute and you seem like a really cool person that I’d like to get to know. Another time I’d like to take you out. How do you spell your name?” while handing her your phone in “Add Contact” mode. If she wants to give you her number she’ll put it in. Regardless - in either situation do *NOT* immediately walk away. Stay for 1–2 more minutes and engage in chit-chat. If you immediately leave then you are sending the signal that you got what you wanted and are done with the transaction.

What do you say, more better or better, when comparing two things?

What do you say, more better or better, when comparing two things?A baseball is more better than a softball.orA baseball is better than a softball.Butter is more better than margarine.orButter is better than margarine.In comparing two things like that, the word “more” is meaningless. Either something is better, or it is not. If it is better, it doesn’t need to be considered more or less better.If you are comparing three things, or comparing two things in functionality, I can understand why someone would be tempted to say “more better”, but it would still be grammatically incorrect because of the meaning of the word better, which already implies “more”. Kind of like using a double negative doesn’t really make sense. ( I don’t have no apples.)While there are colloquialisms in some places that use these terms like in this way, they are not correct.Using a baseball for our game would be more better than using a softball.orUsing a baseball for our game would be better than using a softball.OrUsing a baseball for our game would be preferable to using a softball.In the last example, the word preferable, to my way of thinking, replaces the incorrect “more better” with an acceptable synonym that implies the same meaning without creating the redundancy inherent in “more better.”Butter is more better than margarine for flavor, but margarine is more better than butter for health reasons.orButter is better than margarine for flavor, but margarine if better than butter for health reasons.orButter is preferable to margarine for flavor, but margarine is preferred for health reasons.Hopefully you can see the distinctions there. They are subtle, but they do exist, which is why some colloquialisms use “more better”. There is a need for the expression of that idea, but there is a “proper” way to express it.A golf ball would work, but a baseball would work better, and a softball even more better.orA golf ball would work, but a baseball would work better, and a softball would be even better.orA golf ball would work, but a baseball would work better, and a softball would be better yet.In those examples, “more better” might be more more acceptable than when comparing only two things, as you are determining a hierarchy of worthiness and one is “more better” than the other two, but again, it is still a redundancy and I would recommend avoiding it.I hope that helps!

What movies would you say had a better theatrical version than a director’s cut?

Whilst most praised to the skies the final (umpteenth) version of Blade Runner, I’m not sure it was that much of an improvement apart from the CGI. It just demonstrated to me that you could distribute half a dozen versions of varying qualities for varying responses and a tad more box office for any film - just not sure it was worth it and is just a bit cynical.Secondly, there is Close Encounters. Whilst I think Spielberg laid on the mud pies, pillows and mashed potato a bit thick, the letting us see inside the mother ship in the special edition was a mistake. I believe he’s acknowledged this.Finally - there is 1941, which I quite liked. I recently saw the extended cut, which completely ruined it. It’s not a director’s cut per se but I can’t see how they’d have got it done without his approval given he’s the most powerful man in Hollywood.

Why would you say a company being private is better rather than public?

Because owners have direct control over the enterprise. It's less vulnerable towards both the public at large (that tends to act irrationally) and conscious malice (being caught up in some bigger market manipulation).Because, as already said in other answers, it's possible to maintain long-term vision.Because the company doens't need to follow the market, grow more quickly than might be comfortable, or shrink unnecessarily, based on public interest or trendiness.