What three achievements can convince an anti-trump supporter that he is a good president?
What three achievements can convince an anti-trump supporter that he is a good president?Truly drain the swamp. Get the dark money out of politics. Get rid of the super mega donors. (Not going to name names)Stop lying, stop being divisive, call out the obstruction from every Republican and Democrat equally. Retroactively make amends for the outright obstruction from the Republican senate leader who refused to even hold hearings regarding the nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court for over a year while POTUS Obama was in office.ResignClearly these are not going to happen. I would settle for an honest attempt to meet both parties and force them to work together on things like: Better schools, infrastructure, healthcare, higher living wages for lower and middle class Americans. Turn his twitter rants against the real enemy…partisan, obstructionist politicians who time after time choose their parties interests over the interests of the country. Again, we are all Americans first, we are stronger together. Like it or not, Hillary Clinton had the right slogan. This country is truly great when we all work together.
Why do liberal women hate President Trump, when it was Bill Clinton who had sexual encounters during his presidency?
As a liberal woman myself I would have to say that there are so many reasons to despise #45. I myself am not a fan of Bill Clinton’s philandering. However, Bill Clinton did not insult heavy women that I know of. He was not crass in the way he spoke. #45 is crass and immature. He is low class. He is a misogynist but he is so much more. Even though some people cringe when someone states that he is similar to Hitler(may his name be blotted out) he truly is in some ways and I am not the only liberal Jew who believes so. Wait, there’s more! He doesn’t recognize facts. He colluded with the Russians. His entire administration is corrupt. He’s mocked the disabled. He also doesn’t have the political experience that Bill Clinton had. I could go on and on actually because there are so many reasons to despise him. Attempting to compare Bill Clinton to #45 really is absurd. Perhaps after having had a chance to ponder this question further I will be back to amend this answer with a more comprehensive list of the many reasons I despise #45…because there are so many valid reasons behind the emotion.
What kind of president would Michelle Obama be?
A2A:Michelle Obama is never going to be president. She has thus far shown no indication of interest in the job, has never held political office, and really has no reason to want the job.But if we are playing “what if,” fine.Michelle Obama is a smart woman. She was graduated from Princeton. She took a law degree from one of the top law schools in the world. She passed the bar in Illinois, which is not easy.But frankly, she has zero experience doing anything remotely like being president. Yes; she was married to Barack Obama, and saw, secondhand, some of the trappings of being president for eight years. But - her education and intelligence aside (and there are hundreds of thousands of smart, educated people in the country) - there is nothing that suggests that she would be prepared to be president.I imagine then, that her administration would be one that looks very, very much like any other garden variety, centre-left Democratic administration.She has no foreign policy experience, so I would bet she would fill out State with warmed-over folks from previous Democratic presidencies.She’s not an economist or labour expert, so these jobs would be filled with leftovers from her husband’s (and Bill Clinton’s) time in office.Other than being a parent, she’s never really run a school, so the Ed department would be led by an off-the-shelf Democrat.I think you get the picture.Lacking the experience of being in the senate or house or governor’s seat, she would delegate most things to people who have real experience with these things.Given that the bench here is filled with people whom we’ve already seen in the jobs, why would we expect anything too different?
Are liberals so comfortable with the idea of Mike Pence as president that they want to impeach President Trump?
My answer is based on working with Democratic politicians going back some 50 years. In those years I also was fortunate enough to meet and befriend several Republican office holders and strategists.A real politician is at heart a pragmatist. Politicians know that their chances of survival depend on what the public mood is. All politicians will tell you they have principles, whether liberal or conservative. But all of them are willing to bend or ignore those principles for the public good and for their own political well-being.Mike Pence is a politician. I may not agree with 90% of his beliefs, but I have seen one very important thing which sets him apart from Trump. He’s willing to abandon his beliefs in the face of public pressure. Trump isn’t.When Pence pushed for and got that draconian “religious freedom” bill in Indiana, the bill that opened the way for blanket discrimination against the LGBTQ community, before the ink was dry, businesses, celebrities, sports groups, entertainers and common people unleashed a tidal wave of condemnation. State and city governments forbade their employees from traveling to Indiana on business. Concerts and plays were cancelled. Businesses threatened to leave the state. Conventions were cancelled. Pence and the GOP legislature were caught off guard. So the man who had not long before declared “I am a Christian first. . .” immediately ordered the legislature to amend the language to be non-exclusionary. In short order, a new bill was presented Pence, who signed it. Less than 10 days had passed from the original bill’s signing to the new bill’s signing. In that 10 days, Pence’s “Christian-first” beliefs went out the window and he bowed to public pressure. That is pragmatism and that is what real politicians do.Pence has proven to be a politician first, a politician who understands what it means to be a politician. Trump has no such background, instead being an autocrat who is accustomed to getting his way, no matter who gets hurt or what the consequences are. He won’t last long. Pence, while in my opinion is flawed, will be a much saner, safer President.
What will happen if President Trump fires the special prosecutor Robert Mueller?
Mueller would be hired back on as an independent counsel, as promised and agreed upon by some of the top officials in Congress.“If President [Trump] fired Bob Mueller, Congress would immediately re-establish independent counsel and appoint Bob Mueller. Don't waste our time.”-Adam Schiff June 12, 2017Mueller would continue the investigation without having to worry about being obstructed in his work. No problem for Robert. The problem will come with Trump, who will virtually lose all support from the very thin string any rational supporters of his may still be holding on to. We’re talking approval ratings with numbers still in college drinking kegs. And people from every news outlet will finally start to talk about Trump’s long lost daughter, Peach. This will force Peach to come forward and introduce herself formally to the nation:“Hi, I’m Peach Trump.”
Whom do Republicans hate more, Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama?
Obama now, Hillary if she is elected the next president. Seriously, though, could you REALLY stomach looking into the hang-dog droopy-eyed phizog of Ted Cruz for the next 4 years? Talk about "egotistical"? How could any president work with an opposition that vowed to defeat him at every turn? "On Jan. 27, 2009, House Republican leader John Boehner opened his weekly conference meeting with an announcement: Obama would make his first visit to the Capitol around noon, to meet exclusively with Republicans about his economic-recovery plan. 'We’re looking forward to the President’s visit,' Boehner said."The niceties ended there, as Boehner turned to the $815 billion stimulus bill that House Democrats had just unveiled. Boehner complained that it would spend too much, too late, on too many Democratic goodies. He urged his members to trash it on cable, on YouTube, on the House floor: 'It’s another run-of-the-mill, undisciplined, cumbersome, wasteful Washington spending bill … I hope everyone here will join me in voting no!' "“It was stunning that we’d set this up and, before hearing from the President, they’d say they were going to oppose this,” Axelrod says. “Our feeling was, we were dealing with a potential disaster of epic proportions that demanded cooperation. If anything was a signal of what the next two years would be like, it was that.” "Vice President Biden told me that during the transition, he was warned not to expect any bipartisan cooperation on major votes. 'I spoke to seven different Republican Senators who said, "Joe, I’m not going to be able to help you on anything," ' "The Party of No: New Details on the GOP Plot to Obstruct Obama | TIME.comNo sir, the hand was extended MULTIPLE times by the Obama administration, but the Republican leadership had a priori conspired to obstruct everything the Obama administration tried to do, even when/if it was beneficial to the country and to the Republicans themselves to do so. Eight more years of Hillary might scare you to death, and I'm not too thrilled about it either. But ANY more years of the Republican status quo scares the living hell out of me!