Why are emo, goth, and rocker people always rejected by society?
Emo is awesome so is goth. People are not use to new ideas. The training todays society has made people think that this is not normal. The sad thing there is always people who are going to look at you and say slut, whore, or goth. No one is accepting. Everyone has flaws. In humans it is we are not very oepn to new ideas. In a few years, nerds will be respected bc of the with the creations. In few years, gay marriages will be accepting. Things will start changing. Personally, nerds are amazingg. My bf is a nerdd. :) People cannot accept anything different. They will but never at first usually. It is always hard to stop and first impression. The mind is so set to think well this type of person is like this.No matter how hard you try you always have that first impression. Soon, societys minds will start opening with all these new ideas.If you can accept without, you have accomplished an art.
Girls reject my proposals saying that I am too innocent like I don't drink or abuse or bike rides or show off etc. What should I do?
I have been there.But in my case we were in Relationship when she broke up with me for same reason .We both use to work in same Office, i had crush on her because of her Frank Nature with all but i could not propose her because i was a shy guy She came to know about my feelings through one Common friend and she started liking me just because i was having Decent Look.I was happy and started dreaming to marry her and was serious for my carrier but on other side it was HELL.She was kind of Girl who like to go for Late Night Party, Booze , Harsh Driving and for her i changed myself .One day we went for Book Exhibition ( i love books :) ) with her, she asked me " How long it will take in this Shitty Place " for a moment i was out of my mind but i responded softly and after sometime she asked me "What's your Favourite Sex Position?" i smiled at her and said M still Virgin and never got in this things , she was stunned my by reply and stared at me like i have done something wrong. She use to ask me to see other Mens Build, their Style n so on...The day when she started Comparing me with other, I thought it will be getting over soon.Then one day She asked me to Meet at CCD and on that evening she asked me to never be in touch because i was not of her level .I was quiet and did not told her what i feel, and i left . . . . It was my Fisrt love and surely the last one...i was crying like child in my room for entire night, did not attend any call from office, friends After 1 month i realise this is not what i deserve and i started searching for New JobI got post of Sr. Finance Analyst and with a decent package to take care of my family .I remember her daily and Miss her alot, but it was her choice LET HER GO :)One thing i learned : There's no true love there is always a Purpose.
If Hitler is hated for killing so many innocent people and communism did just the same, why aren’t American Communists as despised as neo-Nazis by the media?
I’d tell you that they are, to some degree, despised. But I’d be lying if I told you that rejection to Nazism is the same as rejection to Communism: it is not, Nazism is almost universally despised, while Communism still holds a lot of sympathizers.The issue is simple: Nazism directly advocates the inferiority of certain human beings, which resulted in their killings. Meanwhile, Communism advocates for equality of everyone, a classless society and a system in which the government owns the means of production that will pave the way for actual Communism.Communism was, for most of the 20th Century, seen as a great alternative to Capitalism and a way to have a fair and equal society.The killings of people in Communist countries were more means of taking control in a totalitarian state, rather than something the ideology directly advocates.People died in China, the USSR, Cambodia and several others not because Communism says so, but because the leaders wanted to consolidate their power and eliminate all opposition.That’s why Communists are not as hated as neo-nazis. Communists these days advocate for a system that is pretty on paper but just didn’t work at all, and the fact that they idolize genocidal maniacs is sure problematic, but they aren’t necessarily asking for a Cultural Revolution (with cappital C and R) or a Great Terror. Neo-nazis, on the other hand, voice their opinions on who is superior and who is inferior based on race, which directly affects the rights of certain individuals.
Is society better rejecting all religions?
Yes. Because religion is the great divider. When you don't care about religion and leave it alone, it will not peacefully conduct their little rituals because all rituals that does not advance the participants in this capitalistic markets are of little value to religion. Instead religion will rise up to total domination like that ones we had in Europe for thousands of years and still exist today. Why is this domination bad - because it is precisely delusional thinking. Religion is based on fairy tales, that is precisely its divisive power. Only when you accept a total lie could you be a part of a group, think about that, that is very psychologically destabilizing. If you can accept a complete tale of fiction and say it is true, what can't you accept?Religion is the most unamerican thing in America and it exists precisely because the racist hierarchy needs it to survive. Try to find a black person in a white church on sunday, try to find a white person in a black church on sunday, and ask yourself why do white and black church even exist. Segregation.
Is George Sodini an example of a person who let social norms and conditioning get to their head too much?
Yes. Look I know what he did wrong in shooting, but come on, I been rejected and had complaints filed against me just for asking for a date. Most girls are very nasty, and really are not worth anybodies time,. the fcuktard that did the shooting could have done more constructive things with his life like building a fortune for himself instead of whining about some skank. Do you think Trump became rich by pursuing girls instead building his empire???? I don't think so
Why do people consider the death sentence too harsh a punishment even for those who have taken innocent lives?
In the U.S., the death penalty has been challenged as “too harsh” under the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits “cruel and unusual punishment.” The Supreme Court has held that a punishment is “cruel and unusual” if[1]:“By its severity [is] degrading to human dignity," i.e., torture.It “is obviously inflicted in wholly arbitrary fashion."It “is clearly and totally rejected throughout society."It “is patently unnecessary."The most common attack on the death penalty as applied in the U.S. is that it is applied arbitrarily (No. 2 above). The means that similarly situated individuals who commit similar crimes receive different punishments. So, for example, any indigent person charged with a death penalty-eligible defense in California is appointed two attorneys, both well-qualified in death penalty law, and given resources to investigate the crime and defenses. But in other states, the accused might only be given a single attorney who may have never handled a murder case before, and then given only a small budget for investigation or experts. Once might surmise that the outcomes will be different. In such circumstances, where the outcomes seem to hinge partially on the resources allocated by the state to the accused, there is an argument that the death penalty is applied arbitrarily and therefore “cruel and unusual.”Some also argue that the method of death is so painful as to constitute “torture” (No. 1 above). That was the rationale used by most states to do away with the electric chair.[2]Some have argued No. 3, that evolving views of crime and punishment have rejected the death penalty. That view was applied by the Supreme Court in rejecting the death penalty for child rape.[3] Thus far, the Supreme Court has not accepted that rationale for capital murder.I am not sure what No. 4 means by “patently unnecessary,” but I could imagine a situation in which the condemned murderer had only a few days to live due to a terminal illness, yet the state insisted on proceeding with the DP.Sorry for the “legalese” but since it is a legal topic, it should be addressed in view of applicable law. Many people just “feel” the death penalty is right or wrong, but the law overlays a logical framework on those feelings.Footnotes[1] Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972)[2] The shocking truth about the electric chair[3] KENNEDY v. LOUISIANA
Do you think it's morally justifiable to hate or reject psychopaths that never committed a crime?
Is it morally justifiable for me to hate neurotypicals if they have never committed a crime?No, of course it isn’t.I call this the test. It’s inspired by this clip.When there is a question such as this, run it backwards through your head and substitute “psychopath” for neurotypical. If it sounds silly, that would be a good indication that it is silly.I have no idea the intention of the asker. The annoyance is directed at the people that have the hubris to ask these questions from a stand point of assumed moral superiority due to having empathy, or not being a psychopath.
Why is Man's Nature Rejected in the Modern World?
Males are the way they are largely due to evolution. Sexual promiscuity has lead to the survival of the species, and aggression has lead to success in the natural world. Yet these very characteristics are shunned in the modern world, especially by females. Here are a few examples: -A man who stares at an attractive woman or thinks about sex often is degraded as a "pervert" or "pig" -A man who engages in sex with multiple partners is degraded as a "player" -It is often considered childish and immature if a male thinks about women often -Male children are scolded when they get angry -The term "macho" is often used to degrade male aggression -Females often get angry when their male partners engage in a fight This world we live in is artificial. We are veiling our true biological nature. We are not above animals. We are biologically defined as part of the animal kingdom. Our aggressive and sexual nature was selected for, and yet, masculine characteristics that have lead to success are constantly degraded and punished today. Feminism is getting out of hand. Males can expect a kick to the balls if they so much as touch a girl they don't know so well. Females often have unrealistic expectations of males before they will ever considering engaging in sex with their male partners. And males are often stopped from releasing their aggression, leading to built up anger over time, in combination with the fact that it is often such an obstacle to obtain a sexually receptive partner. It is no wonder many males today are so frustrated. The movie Fight Club really captures this idea well. Please discuss your thoughts.
Why would men reject a beautiful woman?
justme...for the psycho who said im stuck up...lol no YOURE stuck up....look at your attitude...i would never date a POS like you....what is wrong with the world today...rude crazy stuck up bad people with crap attitudes like you calling nice good people stuck up...what a sick world we live in...you just answered my question...the world is full of psychos basically and twisted warped people...so if a scumbag like you thinks some sincere person asking a question is stuck up....while u are saying negativiity to me with your sick mean attitude while telling me i have an attitude...it just means this is a warped twisted society with demented people....who are backwards ...you are ignorant arrogant and sick in the head.... a good person like me would never date a POS like you... you need help badly...loser... and my question is for intelligent normal person to answer not some psycho mean negative jerk bully who wants to put others down....too bad u can't delete negative answers from ps