Is it true that China would be joining Russia in fighting against ISIS?
A2A, thanks.Honestly, I don't know, so do allow me to make a wild guess.According to recent news, Russia just announced that their Commercial plane was down in Egypt because of terrorist attack and once again ISIS take the 'honor', details stays unknown. This is the game-changer.Thus, America and now France and other Europe partners who suffered from T-ism would officially welcome Russia to join the team in Middle East.As for China, as Reuters said one day ago, China's anti-Terrorism action in XinJiang is an 'suspecious shady job', 'using the sorrow of France' to 'calling for hatred against Uygur muslims'.Loud and Clear. To some god-know-what reason, China has never been seen as a 'buddy in the same trench', but also never stopped being asked to 'take the responsibilities of being a big country'.What would China do?Carrying the title of 'communism', China was seen as a dictatorship, in some degree, She is. Except this dictatorship do listen to the citizens. Randomly ask 10 people on the streets, at least 9 of them would disapprove the suggestion of sending our soldiers out of the border( actually, there was western media indeed did this kind of survey on the streets this year in China, they got 100% objection). According to Gustave Le Bon's masterpiece The Crowd, civilians don't have much chaces to see the whole pictures to make the right call, how about scholars or militaries? none, no such suggestion.臣闻顺德者昌，逆德者亡。兵出无名，事故不成。东汉·班固《汉书·高帝纪上》Carry out a war/mission without legitimate reason, you will fail.So, I do believe China will offer certain supports to the joint-team to carry out military actions against ISIS in Middle East, secretly or openly, But I don't believe China will send ground troops or airforces to join the action.
What would Stalin do to ISIS if he were alive?
Stalin would do nothing other than to make sure the USSR doesn't get dragged in somehow.Stalin is hilariously misunderstood in this respect. The traditional histories portray him as a crazy expansionist who wanted to march the Red Army to the Atlantic.The truth is, Stalin was hardcore isolationist, and paranoid of a Western European invasion of the Soviet Union. He was perennially insecure about the military capabilities of the USSR. In 1941, he did everything in his power to pretend like the Germans weren't going to attack despite the mountains of evidence and intelligence that they were.In 1945, he took the opportunity of the total German collapse to reorganized Central and Eastern Europe so as to form a wall of satelite buffer states against the Allies. He had no real intention to go past this wall.In 1947, Stalin adamantly refused to declare sides or send troops to aid the Chinese communists in the Chinese Civil War. This turned out to be a mistake as Mao was never able to trust the USSR again after this lackluster support. It would lay the foundation for the Sino-Soviet Split.In 1950, Stalin again declined to send forces to Korea despite having achieved nuclear weapon parity with the US and being so heavily invested in the North Korean cause (the entire North Korean military was built by the USSR with the express aim of conquering South Korea). Fortunately for Stalin, Mao intervened to his benefit and saved North Korea. Ironically, North Korea would always consider the USSR their better ally.In 1953, as he was nearing his death (though he probably had no idea at the time), he pushed hard for an armistice in Korea. Mao had wanted to keep fighting. But Stalin didn't want the war to endanger his Pacific front any longer. It didn't matter to him anymore that there would remain an American beachhead in Northeast Asia, just a few hundred miles from the Siberian border.Getting dragged into a Middle Eastern conflict that could trigger a response from the West was not something Stalin would ever be interested in.
What's your opinion on the ISIS/ISIL?
Should they be bombed to death? Tortured? Or should we let the US government the strongest power in the world to let these ISIS/ISIL monkey's invade our countries? Who hates the ISIS/ISIL more than I do?? Because that **** they told me pissed me the **** off.
Should the United States declare war on ISIS?
Hi guys, I need help with my controversial topic/argumentative essay. I believe United States should go to war, but I can't find much reasons why we should go to war. For those who don't believe the United States should go to war with ISIS, I would also like your answer as well. Thank you guys for you help!! :)
Why doesn't Congress declare war on Isis?
ISIS isn't a state so I'm not sure anyone can technically declare war on them. I think you can only declare war on another country. POTUS may be able to wage military actions without declaring war on terrorist organizations. That said the POTUS should definitely get congress to go along with him rather than doing it unilaterally. Unless congress is unwilling to do what's necessary to protect the US and/or our interests abroad. Duke