Can John Cena break the undertaker's streak at Wrestlemania?
Since all the major wrestlers in WWE history failed to do so, and with John Cena being the top wrestler in the WWE today that can beat basically anyone in the business at least cleanly once, I think I have a heavy feeling John can pull this one out, what do you think? I don't know if Cena can do it, but it has to be someone super special.
Who should end the Undertaker's streak? Should it be ended?
Everyone is talking about the streak. First off let's get one thing clear, it will not be Cena that ends the streak. He's not even a possibility. The streak, should it be ended, will be ended by an up and commer that needs that win to catapult himself to the next level. For example, 3 years ago John Morrison would have been perfect. He was right there, but needed something to make him stand out, ending the streak would have worked. So, if Taker wrestles at Mania XXX, and I think he will, who should end his streak, since I'd say it'll either end there, or it won't end at all. Who should be the man to do it, or should it be done at all? Some possiblities: Ryback, but if he wins the WWE Title between now and then he's no longer a choice. Wade Barrett, he's there, but needs a pusher, this could be it. Miz, former WWE champion, but since then has kinda fallen a little, this would put him back at the top. Kofi, been waiting for years for that push, this could be in. Zack Ryder, fans love him, this could be his moment. Brodus Clay, he'd need to turn heel and use this to make him a monster, but it'd work, that's for sure. Not possible: Cena, Punk, HHH, Kane, Orton, Sheamus, Big Show, Ziggler, Daniel Bryan. They don't need this win. You give it to any of them, you've wasted the streak, you've wasted what could be the biggest win of someone's career and the start of a historic career. It won't go to a person that's already gotten themselves in the HOF, not saying Ziggler and Bryan have, but they are established. Remember what the streak did for Randy Orton, and he lost, Imagine what it'd do for one of the guys I mentioned before if they actually beat it. So give me your pick. Who will it be and why, and who should it be? Best answer will be the one I think makes the best arguement to go with a good choice, or has the best explanation as to why it shouldn't or won't end, though I am 95% sure it will end.
Why the Undertaker's wrestlemania streak was broken?
The decision to end The Undertaker's streak was made by only one person - "Vince McMahon". Days before Wrestlemania 30, Undertaker seemed to be in a bad shape and speculation was that WrestleMania 30 could turn out to be one of his last matches. Vince McMahon was of the opinion that this was the right time to break the streak and he felt that there was no one in the roster other than Brock Lesnar worthy of doing it. So he made the call to end the streak just days before the match. Undertaker, being loyal to the company agreed to do so. In my opinion, breaking Taker's streak was the worst decision ever in WWE history. The Undertaker's streak has been the main attraction of WrestleMania for 15-20 years. The streak was the sole reason for many fans to watch WrestleMania. I mean they could have just ended Taker's career by letting him remain unbeaten at WrestleMania. Even if the streak was to be ended, Brock was not the right man to do so. No doubt, he is a great wrestler, but he is still a part-time wrestler in WWE. Triple H, Shawn Michaels or Kane(Taker's storyline brother) were the worthy ones. However, Vince's call is always final and there's nothing fans can do about it. It still hurts to see the 1 in "22-1" streak.
Who else, besides me, thinks Umaga's stupid undefeated streak must end?:?
You know the WWE claims that they aren't threatened by TNA, but having Umaga have an undefeated streak that awfully resembles TNA's Samoa Joe's storyline in which Samoa Joe didn't lose at all in 2005 or 2006 until he finally lost to Kurt Angle last night to Kurt Angle at Genesis. I am a WWE fan more than a TNA fan, but the very idea that Umaga is anywhere near as good as Samoa Joe is is completely laughable! Samoa Joe is not only a good brawler, he is also very quick for his size, he has martial arts skills, and he is an extremely good technical and submission wrestler. The point is that there is no simularites and this undefeated streak needs to end. I am not saying that there is no way Umaga (Eddie Fatu) can't become a great wrestler (it runs in his family with people like The Rock, Yokozuna, and Jimmy "The Superfly" Snuka) but he is not ready to be in the WWE Title hunt. What do you think?
Who do you think the Undertaker will wrestle at wrestlemania 33?
Facing ‘The Phenom' at Wrestlemania and to be the one to end the streak was what every single superstar tried to do and failed until Lesnar conquered it. But there was this guy who never faced him. John Cena.Imagine. John Cena vs The Undertaker. On the grandest stage of them all. I Quit match.Though this dream match would have received humongous amounts of attention had the streak been still unconquered, it's probably not too late to still go through with this. Rumors were there that Vince wanted the match to happen at Wrestlemania 32 itself but Cena's injury rendered the plan useless.( Though I think wwe fans thoroughly enjoyed Taker vs Shane).Although as far as the opponent for Undertaker goes, Kurt Angle or Shelton Benjamin can be chosen since it is rumoured that these guy might be returning to wwe. But if a guy currently working with wwe has to be the opponent, it has to be Cena.
Why did the Undertaker’s undefeated streak end at WM 30, and not WM 33?
Not sure if this has been touched in yet, but one of the main reasons was that whoever broke the streak had to be someone who handle the aftermath.The Undertakers streak was one of the last remaining things that fans sincerely loved in wrestling. Now a days we’re all cynical smarks who boo baby faces and cheer heels just to piss off Vince McMahon. The Undertaker and his streak however, were loved and respected by the fans. If hypothetically, AJ Styles broke the streak, it might have turned him into the most hated man on the planet for the rest of his career.Insert Brock Lesner:On a personal level, Brock Lesnar doesn’t give a fuck what you or I think. Even if we all did hate him, he’d just laugh and collect his checkBrock Lesnar is a part timer. A lot of people think that’s a reason why it shouldn’t have been him, but it’s a reason why it HAD to be him. If fans turned on him, they’d only be able to boo him out the building once every few months.Brock Lesnar is one of the most established stars in the industry. If someone else had beaten Undertaker, they would have had impossible expectations to live up to.From Takers perspective, a loss to Brock Lesnar is nothing to be ashamed of. He’s a multi-time Wrestling champ and UFC champ. It was NOT exactly the same as putting over Santino MarellaFinally, all of this was supposed to lead to something bigger. Brock Lesnar ends the streak and takes the heat, then someone beats Lesnar and becomes “the guy who beat the guy who broke the streak.”The only mistake was was they chose Roman Reigns for that position. I have nothing against Reigns. I think he’s a very talented, under-rated performer. But unfortunately, they pushed him to the moon at a time when the audience wanted anything else.In essence, the plan was smart but WWE failed in their execution.