Do you think Hitler would have been proud of Darth Vader?
C'mon, that doesn't make any sense. "A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way...", remember? If anything, you should be asking if Darth Vader would be proud of Hitler. And of course he wouldn't! At least not if you were to go by the fallen hero story. Also, Germany failed miserably to create their Aryan paradise. I don't think anyone sees failure as something to be proud of. And say what you will about Darth, at least he did his own dirty work.
Who was worse: Hitler or Napoleon?
They had little in common. Napoleon had a law code written that was fair, just and equally applied. He welcomed the Jews as citizens of France. Hitler was the entire opposite. You may as well say that Mother Theresa and Lizzy Borden are the same.
Who is worse? Darth Vader or Hitler?
I Do Not, I repeat, I DO NOT want the Logical explanation that Darth Vader was a Fictional Character, & what Hitler did Was actually Real. I Know that. But if Vader were Real, Who would be Worse? I believe Darth Vader Because unlike the mass Annihilation of People, Vader DID blow up an ENTIRE PLANET with several more people on it. I'm just having fun with this debate. No offense Towards those who Died in the 2nd World War. My respects.
Whos worse, Hitler or Gaddafi?
Today my class got onto the subject of Gaddafi and his new rape situation ... and then go onto the subject of Hitler and i said i think Gaddafi is worse than Hitler... everyone in my class disagreed but i still stand by what i think.. What does everyone else think? Agree or disagree? Who's worse?
So, why did Darth Vader go bad?
I can't stand to watch the prequels and I don't want to read a lot of blah blah. Can someone tell me as simply as possible why Annikin went to the dark side? And in the movie, did they ever show him and whatsherface hooking up? I don't mean were there sex scenes, I mean did they show them being together and having kids? Or did she get pregnant and then he left? A very idle question from a very bored mind.
Whos worse Einstein or Hitler?
1) Just going on sheer body count alone, Einstein doesn't have a chance of competing with Hitler and that's assuming we award Einstein full credit for all nuclear technology deaths. (You do realize the total net casualties to date from nuclear technology probably doesn't even crack seven figures, right? Hitler, depending on how you score, is responsible for up to fifty-million.) 2) On what basis are you assigning Einstein responsibility? He certainly never anticipated nuclear weapons technology in any physics theory developmental stage and only discovered that potential (along with thousands of other scientists) after the fact. However, if you are assigning him responsibility for his letter to Truman, that seems quite logical to me but it still does not make him solely responsible for development of nuclear weapons. 3) Einstein didn't kill anybody with science. Based on what I know about him, it seems quite plausible to me that had he foreseen the negative potential of his discoveries in physics, perhaps he might have suppressed them but even so, nobody else was going to discover them five minutes later anyway? The discoveries were always inevitable so it's just not fair to blame Einstein just because he happened to stumble on them first and he is certainly not responsible for the actions of others. Yeah, okay, I suppose he let the genie out of the bottle to some extent, yeah, he wrote the letter to Truman... Sure, he bears some degree of responsibility but "worse than Hitler"? Nah... It was a fun exercise but nah...