Who Would Win In A Match The Iwc

Do u find Wrestlemania 22 to be incredibly overrated by IWC?

I mean, I don't understand why so many people hold this Wrestlemania in a high regard. Let's see:

1. Shawn Michaels in his most overrated Wrestlemania match of all time against Vince (well, against Flair is second most). How the hell is this squash match picked as Match of The Year 2006 over Undertaker vs Kurt Angle (No Way Out 2006) or Edge vs Mick Foley at the same card is always beyond my deepest knowledge.

2. A mediocre main event. Altho the crowd was hot, the started slow and only paced up near the end (similar to the main event of Wrestlemania 21). How the hell many people call this a solid main event is beyond me.

3. Playboy pillow fight lasting 3 minutes which just....ukh...
4. James vs Trish was decent, nothing memorable.
5. A boring tag team match.
6. An even more boring handicap match involving Booker T & Sharmell against Boogeyman...
7. Chris Benoit in yet another wasted booking against JBL. The match was average at best, nothing great.
8. The worst Casket match of all time, and by far the worst match of the night. After all the insane hype for the match and the high hope for Mark Henry spoken by Vince himself, the match became a train wreck and the abnormally dead crowd proved it. The Undertaker's worst Wrestlemania performance ever since his match with Big Boss Man at Wrestlemania 15 (which was the worst HIAC match in existence).

The only two watchable match was the MITB & Edge vs Foley in yet another one of Edge's under-praised and overlooked classic (the other example is his wrestling clinic with Undertaker at Wrestlemania 24).

How the hell was Wrestlemania 22 a great Wrestlemania? It's no different from another train wreck which was Wrestlemania 20.

Wrestlemania 21 was monumental & Wrestlemania 23 was the last of a dying breed. That's what makes these two are a GREAT Wrestlemania.

How the hell so many people in IWC call Wrestlemania 22 a great Wrestlemania is weird.

Have you noticed how the IWC complains about predictability in the WWE today but praises the Attitude Era?

What I would like to know is - were they even paying attention during the attitude era? If they were they would know how corny and predictable it was too - how many times did the faces win? how many times did they lose cleanly? You are complaining about things that have been done the same for years and years but complain about it now because a wrestler you don't like is doing it? 5 moves of doom - Rock, Stone Cold, HHH -all top faces had them so stop being so biased because you grew up watching these guys! The formula John Cena uses now is not far off from all the big faces of the 80's and 90's (getting beat up 3/4 of the match then coming back to win in the end). Remember the "die Rocky die" and "Rocky sucks" chants because he did the same moves over and over? Then you say storylines were better during the attitude era - you had japanese guys trying to cut off a man's penis, an old woman giving birth to a hand, and 24/7 hardcore comedy skits which retired guys and a hoe won (and these were BETTER storylines)? The WWE today compared to the 80's and 90's = Same Formula/Different Faces.
The bottom line is that the WWE doesn't care about IWC bloggers and they certainly won't miss you not buying a PPV! They care about the masses and guess what? The masses LOVE John Cena!!!