Why do some people think English dubbed anime is horrible?
I don’t dislike “English dubbed anime”.I just dislike badly dubbed anime. It just happens that in 99% of the cases, one of the following is true:The dubbing quality is bad.The person who wrote the script understands neither English nor Japanese.The original is just way better.For me, the phrase that describes dubbed anime isVoice actors in Japan are treated as celebrities (the major ones). They are paid lots of money, and there is honor in their profession. When it comes to dubbers, very often you have unprofessional voice actors just looking to make a quick buck. And it doesn’t help that they aren’t seen as proper voice actors by the general population.Also, dubs are quite weird to watch.Hey, if you’re gong to watch a Japanese anime, with all elements Japanese as well as being made in Japan, better watch it in Japanese right?Would you watched F.R.I.E.N.D.S with a bad dub?No?Then why would I watch something like this?The voices make me cringe too…Basically, dubs lack emotion, clarity, and feel.This is not to say that all dubs are bad. There are good dubs too, but many of them are outclassed by the original.For example, Steins;Gate has a great dub. But the Japanese voice acting is so far beyond even it’s own fellow Japanese voices that the dub hardly any attention.There are some dubs though, that are way better than the original. Hyperdimension Neptunia for example.But the dub for Ghost Stories takes the number one place for BEST dub ever.The original bombed so hard, so that the company told the dub voice actors to do whatever they want. This resulted in a hilarious dub.So there you have it.Majority of the dubs are bad, and among the good dubs, the original is almost always better.Bonus clip: From Dragon Ball Z’s Big Green Dub (see comments)
Why do people trash talk even though they lose in matches?
Number one if they thought you were camping they probably were too lazy to watch the kill-cam. I know what its like i think their camping but most of the time the killcam reveals they just were running and popped out of nowhere at the corner of buildings at the right time. Number two they were boasting that they were better than you to make you feel afraid of them or they were talking trash. Noob guns is no such thing unless you're camping with a shotgun but every gun has limits like the carbine in semi auto and Bar is so slow and sniper suck at close range. Its not how good the gun is, its who is using it. And last off, they made up excuses just to try not to show that they suck badly. they make up excuses to cover it up. And i cant believe they said their controller disconnected how hard is it to put in 2 batteries LOL =0
10 Wrestling Rants that wont be popular. Please comment?
1> Bret Hart is a hypercrit and should have never turned up to promote the WWE brand by going on the Hall of Fame. 2> Ric Flair is no way the legend everyone makes him out to be. I dont see why people should look up to guys who sexually harass innocent stewards and insult better wrestlers like Mick Foley. 3> Black Wrestlers seem to have to work harder to get a push. Wrestlers like Mark Henry, Shelton Benjamin, Ron Simmons, Big Daddy V will have to work twice as hard as wrestlers like Batista, Orton, HHH and Cena. 4> Dude Love was a great creation but wasnt as popular as Mankind or Cactus Jack because Mankind and Cactus Jack had better storylines. Dude Love deserved better and a longer run. 5> Triple H is only world champ because hes screwing the bosses daughter. He should have storylines like Shawn Michaels and The Undertaker instead of always being champ or always gunning for the title. 6> Owen Hart should have never of died. It is the WWE's fault he did and the WWE needs to take 100% responsibility. 7> The Ultimate Warrior was hugely disrespected by the WWE. It was disgusting seeing them insult one of the biggest names in the wrestling business. He deserves better and The WWE Hall Of Fame was made for people like him. 8> The Undertaker has lost his phenom edge. The old Undertaker with the pale face, slow paced movements and chest covered up was creepy. They completely f#cked it up with the Badass character and now hes agile and wears a vest like top, he doesnt look as intimidating as he should do. 9> ECW is absolutely awful. It was slowly dying from the beginning but the final nail in the coffin was when they released Paul Heyman. ...and finally 10> Vince only cares about himself. Shane and Stephanie are dull characters but only on there because they are sons of the owner. The fans dont matter and the storylines arent as good as they were when the WWE had descent competition (WCW). All that does matter is that Vince is happy. Screw everybody else.
Would WWE fans complain so much about PG Era if WWE Never had Attitude or Ruthless Agresion Era?
This question really made me thing. Nice work. *Starred* for question quality. Anyways,they would be,but some wouldn't be. WWE was always PG before the Attitude Era and Ruthless Aggression Era.Even back then people were getting bored of seeing the same stuff every week. Then you have people that really like the repetitive storylines instead of a cluster of too many. Also,there would be no WWE if the Attitude Era was never created. It was made to beat WCW in ratings and if WWF ratings kept dropping before the Attitude Era,it would've died around 2000/2001. We would be watching WCW every week instead of WWE. But then again, people would get tired of it and switch over to TNA or ROH or something else out there and WWE would have to do something new to bring their fans back. Even though it was PG before the Attitude Era,it was still way better than the current PG Era. BQ: Im Currently in X9,but i suggest asking the users Y2Jericho Save_Us or L.M.6.9.