Why Are We Making It Hard For Interpreters Who Fought Beside Our Troops In Afghan/iraq To Migrate

Why don't Muslims migrate to other Muslim countries instead of the West?

As it stands today, the so called Muslim countries don't really follow true Islam, and especially the teachings of social welfare and justice system of Islam. The real Islam is overtaken by various new and innovative versions of Islam, which, for the sake of this question we can call Islam 2. Various Islam 2.x versions of Islam, which are benefitting only the extremists, politicians, thugs, corrupt, royals and the rich, have made the so called Muslim countries very unattractive places to live. Remember, matters of the state and matters of religion has a separation in a true Islamic system, but we see the opposite in most of the Muslim countries these days.The Western countries maintain a separation between religion and state matters, and by far and large follow the social system which doesn't exist in most of the Muslim countries any longer, and which actually indeed was there in many of the Muslim countries until few decades ago (1970s), up until the rise of the extremists.The above is the major reason why citizens, whether Muslims or not, of the so called Muslim countries, migrate to the West where they have freedom and can live a productive and happier life.Unfortunately, extremism in the West is also on the rise lately.When it comes to war situation, reality is that majority of the affected Muslims migrate to other Muslim countries. Its only a small number which migrates to the West. And since West makes a lot of noise about it, so you feel like they are migrating to the West.For example, since the start of the soviet war, Pakistan has hosted over 1.5 million Afghan refugees, and this is only the official figure. Unofficial figure is higher. This has been the primary cause of the rise of the jihadists in Pakistan, coming from Afghanistan, trained to fight the Soviet armies. With Soviet armies gone, they brought their 'skills' to Pakistan  UNHCR - PakistanSince the start of the Syrian conflicts, over 1.7 million refugees are living in Turkey as of last year. It is higher now. Syrian Refugees in Turkey: The Long Road AheadOver 2.1 million UN registered Syrian refugees are living in Egypt, Iraq and Jordan. UNHCR Syria Regional Refugee Response

What did Trump mean when he called Obama the founder of ISIS?

The question: “What did Trump mean when he called Obama the founder of ISIS?”I offer you three interpretations.The most generous interpretation:That US middle eastern policy under President Obama contributed to the creation of the power vacuum in Syria and Iraq that allowed ISIS to establish itself as a regional power. The suggestion being that if President Obama had adopted a more aggressive, more proactive interventionist policy then this ISIS offshoot of al-Qaida would have not have come to be, is frankly naive. At it simplest level it ignores the fact that the US invaded Iraq in 2003.However this is the explanation the Trump campaign would have offered in an attempt to justify Trump’s intentionally provocative claim.The second, interpretation:Trump and the campaign wanted a ‘sound bit’ that would get Trump on the news and they would defend the provocative nature of the claim by saying that it was an important issue and they wanted people sit up and take notice.In effect the Trump campaign were playing the sound bite game to which news and media coverage of political campaigns has been reduced.The third and least favourable interpretationThis was an entirely dishonourable attempt to smear the good name and standing of President Obama by baselessly associating his name with that of terrorists.A shallow disreputable attack that any reasonable American ought to have been ashamed of. That such an attack was made by the presidential candidate of the Republican party ought only to increase the embarrassment that would hold itself up as a democracy. That the Republican party did not immediately demand that Trump retract the accusation is an affront to the US and an illustration of the depths to which partisan politics has sunk in the US.Worse still is the insult to Republican voters that Trump and his campaign should have so little respect for them ,that they would offer up this dubious suggestion presented in a manner clearly intended to suggest that President Obama was personally sympathetic to terrorists. An insult made worse by Trump calculated repetition of President Obama’s full name Barack Hussein Obama in order to overemphasis the President Obama’s middle name.It is regrettable that of the three interpretations, it is the deplorable, inexcusable third explanation, that is by far the most likely.