Why does Russia support extreme middle east dictators and crazies?
In fairness to the Russians, the US does as well. In fact, right now the US is supporting Hamid Karzhai, the president of Afghanistan, who publicly stated he'd side with Pakistan if war were to break out between the US and Pakistan. Chew on that famalies of US service men and women who've died in Afghanistan... But to answer your question: 1) Russia will always do anything it thinks will subvert US interests abroad. 2) Russians STILL have dreams of global conquest and the sort of moves you described are seen by them as laying the groundwork for that dream. The only problem is that if you were to hand a US visa to any Russia who wanted one, 70% of the country would empty out overnight. As for China, they're mostly interested in being top dog in Asia, but they've been making moves in Africa and Latin America. One thing I'll say for the Chinese, they always work toward Chinese interests. The same can't be said of what passes for leadership in the US. The US government is a wholly owned subsidary of corporate America, and corporate CEOs would sell their mothers into white slavery if there was a dollar in it. What's best for We, The People is the absolute last thing the people who pull the levers of power in the US think about. Exhibit A - Over 200K US troops in Afghanistan and a virtually open border with Mexico.
Hypothetical World War 3:United States, India, Russia, China, Israel ( Top military) Vs Rest of the world?
India, Russia, China, and Israel combined could definitely take over the entire landmass of Europe and Asia. They might get a little bit of resistance from Britain, but the sheer numbers would be enough to overrun them. The stiffest resistance would probably come from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and North Korea. Meanwhile, the United States could probably just systematically clean house in North and South America. The key would be to hit Canada first. That way all our enemies would be to the south. Also, China and Russia could sail across the pacific to assist, though in the water is the least place we need backup. The U.S. Navy alone could take out most South American countries, considering they have their own air power. Meanwhile, after China, Russia, and the other 2 have taken over 2 continents, it's time to sail/fly down and start laying into Australia. The U.S. could definitely afford to send some assets to assist, and the island will fall. this only leaves Africa. It's safest to leave them for last, due to the fact that they have no real way of intervening in saving the rest of the world. We could literally just take them over country by country, starting with Egypt, and moving west and south. They wont know what hit them. All the soldiers down there are tribal bullies who murder women and children. They cant fight a real army. Once tanks, fighter jets, artillery pieces, drones, and attack helicopters start laying into them, they'll be routed quickly. The logistics would be tricky to occupy every African nation, but we don't really need to do that to own the world. U.S. China and Russia are enough alone to control the earth, militarily, economically, and geographically if they ever truly got onto the same page and cooperated with each other 100%
The answer forbyour question stands a very clear no one...Not USANot RussiaNot ChinaNot IndiaNot the EuropeansAnd of course not middle east....Infact as per my concepts this question doesn't stands legitimacy....Because USA and Europe have pledged to help each other and come to rescue in case of war... So they can't be against each other and of course middle east Asia is not dumb enough to take India, China & Russia head on with practically no scientific expertise and lower population levels.....Moreover even if it happens it would be a world war III sort of scenario as almost 5 billion people would be each other....And near by states countries with rest 2 billion won't be felt without their fare shares of wrath in such a war...So forget about war... As it is purely not in anyone's benefit.... Why to bring in the best of allies against each other
America,Ethiopia,and Israel vs Rest of World?WAR?
"America,Ethiopia,and Israel vs Rest of World?" Seriously? Rest of the world obviously. That said it'll never happen that way, the USA is a member of NATO... if the USA is attacked all other NATO countries would be obliged to help on behalf on the USA. It's a term in the contract that's a remnant of the Soviet paranoia days. Also I'm from Canada, even without any treaty the USA and Canada are the best of neighbors so I can't see the world ganging up on the USA and Canada just standing by and watching from a distance.
Why do many other countries try to mimic the US - Middle East w/ skyscrapers, Russia - space shuttle (fail) &?
Sad to say this, but Russia and China can do things with quicker turn-around times than we in the US are allowed to. When they want to build a skyscraper in China, they just do it. In America, the builders have to grease the sticky palms of politicians and lawyers before they can even plow the ground. And more money and "considerations" must be paid to these lawyers during the progression of the building. This is why the One World Trade Center has taken ten years to build, and it's not done yet. When the Empire State Building went up, it was built in 16 months. Now it takes that long just to draw up the paperwork.
Because media mostly report these area.Your world is just what you see.And unfortunately, the most powerful media always be aggressive,like BBC.and fake News,like CNN.They said , U.S is bad, China is bad,Russia is very bad, and mid-east is so f***ed up.Then everybody who read them will thinkoh, these countries are so funning.And then they consume in these topics.One example is scorning them .