Why is Cristiano Ronaldo liked more than Lionel Messi?
I don't know how you measured this, I will assume that you based in follows on social networks and I will anwser on top of that.Cristiano Ronaldo is more liked because he is a perfect pop player, he is a marketing guy, he promove himself and his carrer, style of life and style of play are flashy. let see?Cristiano Ronaldo played for Manchester United and Real MadridThe two most popular clubs ever, this meens that he is belove for the two club supporters giving him a huge fan base.He is a pop starWhile Messi is family guy, Cristiano live a hollywood life, always in pop magazines, going out with models, buying expensive cars, with this he appears more in gossip news, boys want to be him, this boost his popularity.What do you think is more appealing?thisor this ?He is good lookingIt is comproved that people tend to like attractive person more and Cristiano use that, this give him a strong girl fan base, I know one girl that only like Real Madrid because of Ronaldo and she said that she want married him. Also his looks help him to sell products and make advertising with more facility, again boosting his popularity.His style of play.Cristiano is a flashy player, he do step-overs, tricks, fancy passes, elasticos and made celebrations sending the stadium shut up, this style of play draws attention, especially to the young people and the new people on the sport, he is a charismatic player that is easy to like.And finally, he is a damn good player.Although I find Messi better Ronaldo is amazing player, he aready won everything with both clubs, he made amazing goals, solo goals, headers goals, free kick goals, long range goals, and his numbers and record are very impressive:All this together make him a perfect popstar player and a much more appealing footballer than Messi.
Why didn't Louis Van Gaal replace Jasper Cillessen with Tim Krul for the penalty shootouts in the Netherlands-Argentina game?
Van Gaal had made all three allowed substitutions.He made his final substitution during extra time, letting Huntelaar into the field for Robin Van Persie. I don't think that was a good move. I could have understood the substitution if Netherlands had created several goal scoring opportunities and Van Persie had missed those chances. But they couldn't even create goal scoring opportunities in this match, so substituting Huntelaar, who is a classic center forward that needs to be set up by his teammates, wasn't going to change the course of the game.And judging by Cilliesen's performance in the shootout, substituting him for Krul would have been far more helpful.
If winning isn't everything then why do they keep score?
Of course winning is not everything, but how do you know the winning without keeping the score?The story goes like this.....First we should have a contest; for that we should keep a score, then we'll know the winning and the losing. Participating is all the more important; winning and losing are part of the game.Moral of the story is:The winning should not go to the head and the losing should not go to the heart.
Why do Madrid fans call Messi "Pessi"?
First of all those are not Madrid fan or Madridista they are Madriots who spoil the Beautiful Game.Yes,we Madrid fans hate to see Lionel Messi destroying Real Madrid but it does not means that we will insult him.Similarly, Barca dogs remember not the Barcelona fans calls Cristiano Ronaldo penaldo.Mostly, they are fanboys of Cr7 and Lm10 who don't watch football but always plays a part in ruining football.Here are few idiotic post by their fanboys-So when we can enjoy both the genius together we should not compare the 2 legends and only respect both. Love one respect both. Because respect makes the beautiful game the beautiful.Here's what both have to say about each other.Visca BarcaHala MadridArin
Can a player or team sue a referee for incorrect decision?
Can a player or team sue a referee for incorrect decision? Is there any legal binding that stops them to do so?In soccer football, there are several reasons why teams don’t/can’t/won’t sue a referee for an “incorrect” decision:The Laws of the Game. If teams play the match under the Laws (or under most other bodies of soccer rules), they thereby commit in advance to accept the Referee’s authority and decision-making. Courts generally respect this, for Referee decisions within the game’s rules.Law 5 very carefully and pointedly says, in part:2. Decisions of the referee Decisions will be made to the best of the referee`s ability according to the Laws of the Game and the ‘spirit of the game’ and will be based on the opinion of the referee who has the discretion to take appropriate action within the framework of the Laws of the Game. The decisions of the referee regarding facts connected with play, including whether or not a goal is scored and the result of the match, are final.…and Law 5 also lays on the teams and players the following, saying in part:6. Liability of Match Officials A referee or other match official is not held liable for: …● any other loss suffered by any individual, club, company, association or other body, which is due or which may be due to any decision taken under the terms of the Laws of the Game or in respect of the normal procedures required to hold, play and control a match.…Binding recourse. FIFA and almost all national federations (and other soccer organizations), in their administrative rules and organizational by-laws, mandate that teams pursue all disputes or complaints within the football soccer hierarchy and structure, and not seek recourse under law.The Spirit of the Game, which assumes the requirement for a neutral outside arbiter whose decisions must be accepted. To recur to higher authority is to make it impossible, in practical terms, to ever play a match and expect its result to stand.The Spirit of the Game also says that football is ONLY a game, even if it is also big business and even if people treat it as more important than anything else.
Your favorite hockey memory?
Either playing or watching. Mine was in a hometown tournament in Minnesota, about 4 years ago when i was in seventh grade. I scored the game winner in overtime for the championship. It was against the other A1 team from our club too. My coach and I still talk about it from time to time.
Youth coaches, how do you respond to this?
As a coach, I tell my players to ignore it. As an umpire, I generally ignore it. In youth ball, cheering for your own team is fine. Directing the yelling at the other team is not. That's how I approach it as a coach or as an umpire. If I'm umpiring kids who don't shave, and the noise gets markedly louder when the pitch is in flight, or a fielder is in the about to field a batted ball, the offending team gets a warning for unsportsmanlike conduct. If I'm umpiring an instructional level, I will give them the explanation at the top of this reply. With players who shave, this kind of bush-league crap is generally not an issue. The players ignore it, so it doesn't have any effect, or a pitch in the ribs becomes a remarkably effective deterrent. From a rules perspective - Some organizations provide rules for verbal interference (with a fielder, resulting in an out) or verbal obstruction (with a runner, resulting in a potential base award). I don't know of any that has any penalty yelling at a batter other than ejecting the offending player for UC. -- The phrase "intimidating, taunting, or baiting" still requires a bit of a stretch to prevent the "batter, batter, batter, SWING!" kind of chanting. Basically, you have to rely on an unsportsmanlike conduct rule (which all of the rules codes have) to get them to knock it off, and it usually results in a warning then ejection, rather than an out, except in the specific instances of rule sets that define verbal interference and obstruction. NFHS (high school) rules define verbal interference, so yelling at a fielder as he is attempting to field a ball (such as a runner standing by a fielder and yelling as the fielder is about to catch a popup), will result in an interference call and an out. NFHS also defines verbal obstruction, so if a fielder does something to screw up a runner (such as yell "BACK!" to a runner who is stealing a base), this can result in a base award. But yelling at the batter? Nothing in NFHS rules other than the UC rule. Pro rules have UC, but don't have verbal interference or obstruction. Don't have time to check my NCAA book. -- Oh, yelling at the pitcher? That usually shows up in the book as UC intended to make the pitcher balk.