Why was the 1500s and 1600s called the Scientific Revolution?
Francis Bacon (1561—1626) "proposed an entirely new system based on empirical and inductive principles and the active development of new arts and inventions, a system whose ultimate goal would be the production of practical knowledge for “the use and benefit of men” and the relief of the human condition. http://www.iep.utm.edu/bacon/ "Bacon's late writings laid the foundation for a new scientific culture, as he had hoped. Any great step in humanity's progress has to be imagined in an almost mystical vision of what could be, before people are motivated to realize it. In Novum Organum, Bacon outlined the new scientific method (organum); in New Atlantis, he described scientific culture in idealized, utopian fashion. The vision had to wait for forty years until a group of scientists, philosophers and philanthropists inspired by Bacon's ideas, founded the Royal Society in 1667. In the last five years of his life, Bacon had written almost exclusively in Latin, and translated certain English writings into what was then the Universal Language. As a result, he was known and admired on the continent; thus were the seeds sown for a pan-European scientific movement." http://www.baconsocietyinc.org/reputatio... If not for Bacon, the science of the Renaissance would not have been the same, and may not have progressed into what we know today. He is considered the father of scientific epistemology. That means he influenced the thinking process about science, more than any particular science itself, except metaphysics and physics--but those were the only two forms at the time, so he influenced everything!
Why wasn't there a scientific revolution under the Romans?
Actually, there was a technological boom under the Romans. Stuff like roads, concrete, arches, aqueducts, bridges, etc. where all used by the Romans. The Romans had all the best intellectual regions of Europe: Syracuse, Alexandria, Phoenicia, and Greece. The Romans made lots of different inventions, like blowing glass, Latin sails, medical research, and the Julian calendar.However, the reason Rome is not known for its science is because Rome was a military state to the core. Most of its money and achievements came from conquering other territories. During the Pax Romana, or Roman Peace, the Empire reached its height in size. It used this peace time to focus on the country and stimulate the economy. However, the empire began to rapidly shrink and go bankrupt, leaving it with no money for science.In the end, Rome never really focused on science all too much, but rather on military conquests.Source for Roman achievements: Roman Science - Ancient Rome - Quatr.us
Why did the scientific revolution only occur in Europe?
Perhaps the scientific revolution did take place in the Middle East - the foundations for the Scientific Revolution were certainly slowly being laid down by intellectuals, especially those of Islam and Christian Europe then.However, what I believe is the main driver for acceptance of science and technology probably best lies in several facts, being"Random events" like the Black Death and the 1755 Great Earthquake which loosened the Church's legitimacy, and increased interest in alternate answers to old questions - see for instance, the Marquis de Pombal's survey following the 1755 earthquake.Strong interest in science from the elite, particularly in warfare, ie in building a better warship, or forging a more accurate and deadly gun. The battles of Ain Jalut, Poitiers, Vitkov and Chatillon in the Middle Ages sparked an almost 6-century arms race in Western Europe, in which alchemists and scientists were patronised by the nobles seeking to increase their power through force of arms.The Renaissance - Europeans were aware of the past, especially that of Greece and Rome and sought to recreate them using any means possible. In contrast, the Islamic, Indian and Chinese empires were big, ruled substantial populations and also controlled plenty of arable land - why bother with science and technology at all?Unique culture that espoused innovation and individual worth over conformity and tradition, especially in two polities - Venice and Holland.Discovery of the New World by Columbus and awareness of the existence of other cultures — especially that of the Mongols in the Middle Ages, and then the Indians and Chinese in the early modern era — increased interest in the secular world, and how it worked.
How did the Scientific Revolution in Europe pave the way for the Enlightenment?
Great successes in physics and other exact scienses gave society a lot of trust in progression and science. Cause of these successes the methods and ways of thinking spread across the whole of society, this later being called the enlightment.
Chemistry during the Scientific Revolution?
Scientific Revolution started and ended in which century(perhaps estimated)? Who were those people who contributed to the field of Chemistry during the Scientific Revolution? What are their contributions? Thanks. :)
How did the scientific revolution changed the way europeans looked at the world?
yes it was an era known as the enlightenment the advancement of physics biology astronomy human anatomy and other things. i think the scientific Revolution was the rebirth of ancient thinking mainly the ancient greeks. in truth i would say it was a very slow understanding of the world around us europe still had a lot to understand off the world around them. in truth i think many europeans thought other peoples were lesser in knowledge even showing someone a mirror made them feel more culturally advanced. but on the whole the scientific Revolution changed the whole image of the world we live in today just look around from transport to medicine everything you name it. centuries earlier these changes were moving about yes but at the rate of a snail.