How important is to teach children about technology in the school age?
Teaching children about technology in their school age will help them to explore new things and helps them to increase their practical knowledge about respective subjects.Technology makes student information limitless, which help them to gain any information within a short amount of time.Due to the effective usage of technology in the school students will be more knowledgeable and can become very good citizen of their respective country with some contribution in building their nation.For more information about best schools in Bangalore, please click the link behind.
Why is it important that we teach kids critical thinking skills in preparing them as future voters?
Critical thinking is important in order to separate truth from fiction.Example:Fox News once told us: "Nothing will ever come close to Ted Kennedy meeting with the KGB in order to beat Ronald Reagan in 1984," Gutfeld said on his show July 15. "It was a quid pro quo. You help the Dems. We help the USSR. If it worked, we would still have the USSR."The voter without critical thinking will say, Ted Kennedy is a Communist, he colluded with the KGB.The voter with critical thinking skills will say, How can I find out if this is true?The statement is not true.Fox News: “In countries where there are higher, more strict gun laws, there is more gun violence.”Non-critical thinking, Gun laws don’t work.Critical thinker, That’s amazing! I need to make sure it’s true.It’s not true.Trump: "U.S. Steel just announced that they are building six new steel mills."Non-critical, Trump is making America great again!Critical, The economy must be booming but is it true?US Steel is not opening any new mills.Trump: "Wow, highest Poll Numbers in the history of the Republican Party. That includes Honest Abe Lincoln and Ronald Reagan."Non-critical thinking, Wow! Trump is kicking ass!Critical, Fantastic! Gotta check those numbers.The first National Poll was taken by a magazine in 1916 and correctly predicted a win by Woodrow Wilson. Lincoln died 50 years earlier.Bush Sr., Bush Jr, and Reagan all had higher numbers.
Why is school and education important when they teach useless things that we will never use in our life?
One function is to weed out the arrogant people who think they already know so much that they are sure how useless education is.The values of an education are many and diverse.You are probably focusing on specific things that you can’t imagine using later in life. The tricky part with this is that there is no way of knowing in advance which particular things will be useful in your future life and career. Take trigonometry for example. Many people will never use it but in my case it turned out to be very important in part of my career.So the strategy in this case is to teach everyone things that have a high probability of being useful later on even knowing that no one will use all of it or maybe even most of it.Another value is in learning how to learn. Even if you don’t retain the specific material or it isn’t useful to you knowing how to learn is a critical skill. In your career it is likely you will come across many things you need to learn. Having good learning skills is critical for success.Beyond the above education is also tremendously valuable for socialization and all the things you learn by participating that you don’t even realize you are learning until after the fact.This is not to say that our existing educational systems are perfect or even very good. There is lots of room for improvement but it is far superior to the alternative of being uneducated.
Why is it so important to have teachers in the schools?
At the earliest level, the teacher is there to help civilize the kids and to help them get a common background of information (alphabet, manners, numbers, etc.). The teacher works hard to help students learn to follow directions (that’s the goal of high school, but you begin to get it at the earliest levels, and it takes a lot of time to learn).People benefit from having someone outside themselves guide their learning - and even for basic survival, we need learning. Now picture, if you will, a classroom where there are plenty of unrippable books, an unbreakable video machine to present ideas for learning, a laboratory for experimenting on stuff. Now imagine them at various grades - kindergarten, third grade, and finally at eighth grade. Is there any level at which they can or will, access these materials in an organized way to come up with… let’s say, the ability to multiply and divide in the head / read a book at 8th grade level / be able to analyze candidates and thus be able to vote sensibly / how to get along with strangers in a nonviolent and happy fashion? Those ideas represent just a tiny portion of what is learned in school. Teachers are experts at facilitating all of this.
Why it is important to be a good student?
Well, this is just my opinion, of course, but here goes... It is important to be a good student so that you can be knowledgeable about the world around you and become a productive citizen who can contribute to making positive changes in our world.
Is math the most important subject to learn in school? Does it give a person the most opportunities later in life?
The most important subject is writing. Not literature, but writing. This will be critical no matter what you do, whether you’re a nurse, an administrative assistant, or the president of the free world.The second most important is probably civics. Not history, but civics. If you can’t understand current events or what electoral debates are talking about, you will actively harm the nation when you vote. Don’t do that.The third most important is science. Even if you don’t understand the finer details, familiarity with the basic concepts of science is increasingly important to being a good citizen.Even though it’s my favorite and has done the most for me,as a PhD engineer published in physics and statistics journals, math is one of the less important subjects. I firmly believe that a “scientist” that doesn’t know math doesn��t really know science, but for the average person, math above a certain level isn’t important. And math below a certain level is downright instinctual—nonhuman animals are able to show an understanding of quantity without training. You don’t need a math degree to know that 3 non-co-linear points define a plane in space; just screw in an air filter. Will the average person need to know the history-changing implications of the Taylor or Fourier theorems? Heck no.
How can school math be revamped to illustrate the importance of mathematics?
Hmmm, sounds like you are trying to teach the philosophical study of Value Theory in mathematics education.If you want to illustrate the importance of any subject, then you must move to philosophy. Importance is a proxy for value, and the philosophical discussions of Value Theory surrounding any particular subject of study.In the ancient times, there was a lot of discussion of the importance of studying various philosophical pursuits in order to become a good citizen. However, that’s hardly a convincing argument by today’s standards (mostly because we don’t have convincing arguments for why we should be good citizens).However, I’d argue that one of the biggest problems that we have with our educational system is that we now treat philosophy with derision, and that has affected our ability to teach.Firstly, for anyone who is going to learn about mathematics (or even science), they should know what mathematics is, and what it’s not. Second, because of the inherent pragmatic attitude that (especially in the Western world) have towards everything, people will need to know what mathematics is used for, despite that mathematics is a field that doesn’t require real-life applications.Moving on, students need to understand that mathematics is a mental concept that we ascribe/encode things to (like a count of 3 of something). It takes place in the mind, and it’s not empirical the way science is.We need to stress that mathematics is a huge upfront investment for huge long-term gains, and since those gains may take so long, every single step along the way where we can point to eventual milestones (learning fractions and decimals so that we can compute construction costs, and how learning infinitesimal calculus and linear algebra can lead to understanding physics).We must also accept that there will be those who will never desire to learn mathematics, despite any convincing argument you may come to. Those students who outright reject mathematics altogether should still be given a mostly-intuitive mathematical literacy education, so that they (as good citizens) can understand what is happening in the world around them. Meanwhile, those who aren’t rejecting mathematics outright aren’t distracted by those who throw up their hands and clamor, “This is stupid” every 10 minutes.
Some people think that the main purpose of schools is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than benefit them as individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an element of coercive development in any society: the community want others to be like them and will manage affairs so that is the end result. And, all centrally-managed policies eventually deteriorate into a box-checking exercise with reduced real-world value.Surely these concepts are not hard to understand?To 'educate' someone would be a different affair from that normally presented: the amount of time spent on academic subjects would be reduced and you would probably want to spend some time on how to live in the world at large, how to develop a career, interpersonal relationships, how to stay physically fit, how to become mentally strong (multiple areas), how to solve life problems, how to survive in the work environment, how to defend your family, how to survive civil unrest, how to travel rewardingly, how to see the world through other's eyes, how to value ideas, how to avoid crooked thinking, how to tell a liar or fantasist from a person of value, how enterprises start well but degenerate in quality and move inexorably toward corruption, how you can use politics at work but not be hurt by it; and plenty of practical exercises in many of these areas. I know this because my own education failed me miserably even though I went to what is regarded as an excellent school. It taught me little of use later. Yes, education can be defined as what is left when you have forgotten everything you learned at school; and some of it does come in handy (I don't have to look up references in Latin); but it is the things I wasn't taught that were to be of most value to me and I had to learn those the hard way.Education is a reflection of society, and some of the things you see in a mirror are not ideal. It is also an ultra-conservative field, which means it is quite good measured by the standards of thirty years ago. Apparently that is good enough.