What was an incident from Martin Van Buren's term where he made an important decision?
Van Buren oversaw the Cherokee expulsion. He sided with the Spanish in the Armistad case. In 1839, Joseph Smith, Jr., the founder of the Latter Day Saint movement visited Van Buren to plead for the U.S. to help roughly 40,000 Mormon settlers of Independence, Missouri, who had been attacked, killed, raped, and run out of the state from their lands The Governor of Missouri, Lilburn Boggs, had issued an "Extermination Order". It authorized Missourians to "exterminate" Mormons and encouraged them to do so. Smith and his party begged Van Buren to intercede for the Mormons. He reportedly told Smith, "Your cause is just, but I can do nothing for you. If I take up for you I shall lose the vote of Missouri. Had he decided differently in any of these cases, he might have made pollitcal enemies, but he would have created a climate of tolerance that would have changed the moral character of the country. Had he done so the riights of minority citizens would have been recognized a hundred years before the civil rights movement. Because his and Jacksons policies lead to moral and financial collapse, Van Buren only served one term in office, any way.
How long must an illegal immigrant wait to re-enter the United States after being deported?
Deportation carries a 10-year (20-year after a crime conviction) bar, unlawful presence another 10-year bar. Somebody who has been deported will never, ever be able to get a non-immigrant visa to the United States again, not even after the bar(s) have been served. Not a chance. The bar basically means: not over my dead body. Once the bar is served, the foreigner can apply for a visa like anybody else. This visa application will be denied, however, based on the history of the applicant. That's common practice and makes a lot of sense. Basically, the only way somebody who has been deported can return to the U.S. is based on an approved I-130 petition of an immediate relative who is a U.S. citizen. So without crime, that would mean 10 years outside of the U.S., as both bars can be served concurrently, meaning at the same time.
Is the E Verify Flawed, or are the illegal aliens saying that for their purposes?
Is eVerify perfect? No. But is it better than current practice? Hell, yes. As it is, there are 5-7 MILLION illegal aliens using stolen SS numbers and/or identities, based on the number of Social Security no matches. Criticisms of eVerify have centered around the fact that legal American workers may be inconvenienced by having to correct their SS records when eVerify flags a mismatch, say, when the worker has failed to file a change of name with the SS Administration when they get married or divorced. Legal workers just notify the SS and their employers of the record change and continue working. There are relatively few of these problems especially when compared with the MILLIONS of illegal aliens who are knowingly committing fraud. Another criticism of eVerify is that it doesn't catch ENOUGH illegal aliens. That it identifies fewer than half who apply. This happens because eVerify does not YET have the capability to match the identity of the person presenting the SS number and name to the person it was really issued to. If an illegal alien commits identity theft, stealing BOTH the name and SS number, eVerify can't tell this. Again, this is far better than the alternative. About half of illegal aliens are caught, compared with virtually none. Also, use of eVerify indemnifies the employer. If you use the system to check a job applicant's identity and that person is later found to be here illegally, you the employer are NOT held responsible. This might happen especially in the situation above where the illegal alien steals both the name and the identity. Current practice, where use of eVerify is NOT mandated, allows employers to claim that they just can't tell real documents from forged or stolen ones, and that they can't look "too closely" or they'll be accused of discrimination. Since the federal government can't exact tough penalties unless it can prove the employer KNOWINGLY hired illegal aliens, this has been a huge loophole for companies to avoid heavy penalties. Mandatory use of eVerify helps to close that loophole.
Are the passports sold on the Dark Web legit and good for crossing international borders or are they just fake passports?
I don't hang around the "Dark Web" much, so I guess I could be wrong.Anyway, this is really two questions:Are the passports sold on the Dark Web legit?Re the first one, if anybody's selling passports, they're not legit. Passports are the property of your government. You apply for them, through your government. No individual has the right to sell them.Are the passports sold on the Dark Web good for crossing international borders?This is a more difficult question. How could we know? Even if you try, and are able to cross several borders, you never know if the next one will work. Border checks vary greatly. A forged passport will probably work in a lot of places, particularly if it's a forged passport of a country which doesn't use too much biometric ID (such as fingerprints). Be aware though that you're risking prison. If you're lucky and going into a third country (not your country, and not the one from the forged passport) you might just get deported and never be allowed in again. But if, say, you are not a US citizen and you buy a forged US passport, and you attempt to enter the USA, you could probably go to prison for a long time.The "sellers" always claim they have an insider that can put your personal information in the system. Is it true? I'm sure it's true sometimes. The problem is such a person is taking a big risk. And if they get caught, there's a good chance that all the passports they have issued will be investigated. How would anybody know? Even if someone knows for sure a spy in, say, the US passport office, how would that prove that your spy is a honest liar?Most countries have a database of citizens, or a few different databases, so if someone attempts to create a passport for someone who is not on any other database, it might look suspicious. For example, in Australia we don't in theory have a central database of all citizens, but for example every adult citizen must enrol to vote. So there shouldn't be too many Australian passport holders who are not on the list of voters. There would be some, such as Australian citizens who live overseas.I'd be surprised if someone could enter passport details into the database without having the passport application form signed by "you".Basically I think any crime which involves using your real name and address is probably quite high risk.What's wrong with using your real nationality?
Identity: Just how easy is it to make a fake passport?
It depends upon the quality of the printers you have access to and the quality of machinery that they have access to. Passports are far easier to counterfeit than say many types of currency.Most intelligence agencies can simply have the same printers who create legitimate passports make passports for their agents. They are, after all, the same government. They would likely run these run these "special passports" at a certain time (after regular employees have gone home) and also make certain that the printers who made them received some type of security vetting.As far as buying passports in the streets, this would be much more difficult. Most countries have their passports created by specific printers in areas outside of their nation. They then ship the passport back to the country which is requesting the order. You could conceivably buy a false passport from an ID broker, but you run the risk that a sharp-eyed customs inspector would notice that it was a fake and detain you.An idea: If you are seeking an "additional" passport, you should look for nations which are known to grant passports to non-residents for significant economic investment in their country. You provide them with the necessary breeder documents (birth certificate,photo ID,etc) and they create a "legitimate" passport for you.Also nations in the throes of social or political unrest might be inclined to grant you a passport. However, this matter should be handled delicately and by someone who is familiar with that nation's systems.
Can I get a US passport with fake birth certificate? Would it work?
It is important to understand that a birth certificate is not an identity document. It is proof of the facts of birth, not that the person holding the certificate is the person named on it. This is why a passport application requires the applicant to apply in person at a passport application acceptance facility where their ID is checked. Most birth certificate fraud is not fake documents, but legitimate documents in the hands of the wrong person.Passport examiners are the best experts in detecting fraudulent birth certificates. They have examples of the thousands of different types, and they know the security features, some of which are not disclosed to the public.But even if someone could produce an undetectable forgery, creating a set of birth facts that never happened, there is another check. The Passport Services Fraud Prevention Offices use an electronic system called Electronic Verification of Vital Events (EVVE) whereby they can check directly with the issuing state to make sure the information on the birth certificate they are looking at matches state records.So no, it won’t work.
Eye scanning and finger print is done incase of labour and immgration ban in UAE.?
Homeland Security Border Control has been operating an expellee tracking system in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) since 2001 when the UAE launched a national border-crossing security initiative. Today all of the UAE’s Land, Air and Sea ports of entry are equipped with systems. All foreign nationals who possess a visa to enter the UAE are processed through iris cameras installed at all primary and auxiliary immigration inspection points. To-date the system has apprehended over 330,000 persons re-entering the UAE with fraudulent travel documents.
Can I fake my experience (as I have knowledge) to apply for immigration to Australia, Canada, or the US? Will it work?
Here is what The Canadian service has to say on the topic:“Employment Letters Do Not Comply with Requirements – Most programs require that work experience be proven by providing an employment letter. These letters, by current and/or previous employers, explain the kind of work an individual has performed on a day-to-day basis.The following must be included in reference letters:Position heldHoursSalary and working conditionsDescription of job dutiesEmployer’s signaturePrinted on company letterheadCompany information such as address and contact informationIf the above requirements are not met, ane mployment letter may not be recognized as proof of the applicant’s work experience.How to avoid: Check your employment letters after receiving them. Providing an employer with a basic template outlining these requirements can also help.”Five Common Immigration Mistakes You May Be MakingI presume that checks on these references will be made routinely.