Why do people suggest Michelle Obama looks like a gorilla?
I'm a Democrat but I don't find Michelle Obama to be an attractive woman EXCEPT when she is in a ballgown and then she is simply stunning. I do not like her style of clothing. I do not like that she wears so many casual dresses (and sleeveless ones at that) and I hate those god-awful prints. I think that her shoulders are too broad and her mouth/bite is weird. I do not like the dress/cardigan sweater look on a First Lady. I prefer and believe that the First Lady should dress conservatively - I think Hilary Clinton has a better sense of propriety than Michelle Obama and that's saying something. I was embarrassed for America by that dress and cardigan she wore when she greeted Queen Elizabeth. Pretty sure Michelle was trying to convey a message but I happen to think it was the wrong one. I do not understand why so many fashion magazines rave about her style - just how many people do you see emulating it? No one. She doesn't even begin to compare to Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis who truly did change what women not only wore but how they wore their hair (although I understand many women are now wearing bangs because of her most recent hairstyle). I could care less what Republicans think of her - I am just not a fan of hers. However anyone who refers to her as a gorilla should be ashamed of themselves; they are comparing her to a gorilla for no other reason than she is black. I like and admire her husband whom I voted for.
Why do conservatives call Obama the Messiah?
I don't know, but it seems to be a conservative-exclusive title. I've never seen a liberal call him that here, but it's hard to find a question where at least one conservative hasn't done it. Perhaps it has something to do with the far right's general religious extremism and the need for them to associate their opponents with the sin of idolatry.
In what way is Obama fascist?
Those people using the term "fascist" about Obama are a real curiosity. It was just a few months ago they were trying to use the term "socialist" about him, and the two could hardly be further apart, so it's clearly a sign of desperation. It's funny, but the New York Times weekender issue addressed this very odd change in tactics in a story written by John Harwood. (see link below) Regardless, Obama is a Democrat and the Democratic Party is generally considered to be left-of-center whereas the political construct called "fascism" is decidedly right-of-center. Fascism, briefly, is a political model designed around an alliance of pro-big-business politicians with big corporations where businesses start controlling the government. You could make an argument that George Bush was doing this over the past eight years, but you could hardly say that's what Obama's trying to do. Quite the opposite.
If President Trump has President Obama arrested and tried for treason, will we experience rioting in the streets?
This is all political rhetoric for the masses. Keep them riled up and screaming. And by the way disown them when they do something bad in his name. (I didn’t tell them to do that) No one is going to arrest President Obama. He has to keep ginning up issues so we don’t spend time talking about. His family who could not get security clearances without him getting involved. ( he denied that). all of the things he has tried to do that got stopped in federal courts. All of the people who were great now he does not know. David Duke, George Papadopoulos, Paul Manafort and lastly Wikki leaks. Healthcare is easy. The great negotiator pissed off John McCain and then expected him to give the deciding vote to kill Obamacare. All of the turnover in his cabinet and administration. All of the temporary cabinet secretaries and their subordinates. And on and on.