Would You Rather Us Be Alone In The Universe Or There To Be Other Species

Do you think we are alone in all universe or that we’re not? Which one is scarier to you?

I think the second option is scarier.If alien civilizations exist, where are they? Why can’t we see them?It’s not limited to radio signals and oxygenated atmospheres; we couldn’t see our own civilization just a few light years out. The problem arises when we think of future civilizations. For humanity, our insatiable desire for energy demands that we eventually harvest the Sun directly — trillions upon trillions of solar panels in close orbit, lapping up each delectable Watt of power, beaming it around the neighborhood for us to use.Forget scanning planets — that’s pretty obvious. Anyone in the galaxy could see that kind of structure. But… we don’t see any. So if alien civilizations exist, here’s some potential conclusions:Alien civilizations destroy themselves before reaching this point.Alien civilizations try to reach this point, but discover it’s impossible.Neither option would bode well for humanity. Either we’re doomed to kill ourselves soon, or we’re doomed to die chained to our world, forever looking skyward but never able to touch it. That sucks.I choose to believe in the math saying it’s possible, and thus the conclusion that we’re alone in the cosmos.

Would you rather have humanity alone in the universe, or not?

By “humanity alone” I assume you’re asking “are we the only intelligent life forms in the universe?” And to properly arrive at an answer we have to consider the size of the universe, which, as a matter of fact, we don’t have a clue at present. And I’m not referring to the observable universe, which we know to have a radius of about 46 billion light years, but the entire universe, which would include everything that lies beyond the event horizon of the maximum-detectable recessional velocity, currently at the above distance. Having made a considered estimate of the probability of any randomly-selected planet being host to an intelligent civilization, and concluding it was extremely small ( I estimated 1 chance in about 10^16 to 10^19), the likelihood that we are alone in our galaxy is close to certainty, but there are an estimated 1 to 10 trillion galaxies in the observable universe, which might be only a tiny part of all physical reality. With each galaxy home to around 1 trillion planets, the numbers become truly staggering, so any rational estimate of exoplanet life would mean that there are many other earth-like planets, but they are so distant (beyond neighboring galaxies) that our descendants (even in the far future) may never know of their existence. So my answer to this question is it makes no difference, because either way it’s the same outcome. We are effectively alone in the universe.

How do you interpret if humans are alone in the universe?

Everything in this universe is well balanced.If anything get decrease then ultimately the others also get affected.Beside from food source , shelter , decrease/increasing of population also well balanced as for there are separation like :Herbivores, carnivores, omnivores as like we do segregation of waste(garbage) to manage.Coming to your question , if there only human beings then there will be lack of food source and so many will fight against each-other and they'll be bound to eat each-other and so many people will die and which will badly effective to working purpose and economy will be down and if it get down gradually then one day there'll be probably no human being remain alive as it'll cycle.