Anyone else tired of Roman Reigns?
I know WWE is pushing Reigns as the next big thing but to have the same ending for weeks is getting kind of tiresome, I want to see Kane & Orton get the upper hand for once, it's just boring now.
Who is a better wrestler between Dean Ambrose, Roman Reigns, and Seth Rollins?
There are a few sub-parts of wrestling that make a great wrestler. Let’s mark those first:Pure Power (or as Cena termed it, ‘Ruthless Aggression’): This aspect of wrestling is probably the foundation upon which a wrestler is built. Without power, a certain individual does not come across as a pure wrestler. This is where Roman Reigns gains the most, and to a certain extent, Seth Rollins too. Ambrose loses out here to both of his Shield-mates, however, not too far behind.Technicality: The aspect which every wrestler builds himself/herself into. Without an abundance of technical prowess, a wrestler is generally limited to fend off either with pure power, dominating everyone, or athleticism. This is where Seth Rollins gains the most, while Ambrose comes in a close second. Roman, however, is limited with his technicality, although he is showing signs of building it up.Stamina: This peripheries the duration of fight in a particular wrestler. This is the attribute where a person can come out to be a true survivor (For eg, Dolph Ziggler). This too is one of the major necessities a wrestler requires where all three member s of the Shield score effectively, however, Rollins gets the marginal benefit.Athleticism: At par with technicality, they are inter-dependent. Here too, Rollins easily beats his Shield brothers due to the exemplary amount of improvement he brings into his style every week.Madness: There’s nothing to explain here, but Ambrose scores the best.Mic-Skills: The ability of a wrestler to reach a wider audience and incite emotions. Rollins is undoubtedly the champion here, as Ambrose comes in a close second. Mic-skills ain’t Roman’s thing yet.Judging by these facts, Seth Rollins is a far better wrestler than Roman Reigns or Dean Ambrose, or anyone on the roster right now. WWE has struck gold with Rollins and there is nothing that seems to stop him. However, a continued interest in Roman, due to Vince’s attraction towards big and pretty men, has side-lined Rollins and almost made Ambrose disappear. This is why Triple H created NXT; to protect talented wrestlers from being overlooked by Vince.Let’s just hope that Rollins finally gets his due!Subscribe here for more exciting stuff on WWE: Yard of Wrestling
What do wrestling fans like about Dean Ambrose?
It took me a long time to start liking him. I really hated him when The Shield first started and he was United States Champion, he rarely defended the title and when he did it was obvious he would still win... I like him now, with Bryan, Punk, Batista and Reigns out of the picture and Lesnar not really appearing, and Cena or Orton always being champion, Ambrose is someone different. He's an up-and-coming-future champion and he definitely has the champion material, if he doesn't get injured.
Do you think Roman Reigns is overrated?
Well he is marketable so he is overrated. He can't carry a match like the other members but he has good looks which will make him a future main event talent in the eyes of WWE management and so he is booked strongly. He lacks charisma, but he is a strong guy who can only use the spear as his finishing move. So he is overrated since he sells well. He will be a hit with the ladies which will increase WWE's income and he is good for business. So expect to see him winning more matches.
Why does the WWE universe hate Roman Reigns? Is it because he beat Undertaker at WrestleMania?
Because in the main fans are tired of being “dictated to” by Vince McMahon who they must get behind. Several talents have gotten over on their own and their pushes ruined as a result. Chris Jericho, Christian, CM Punk and Daniel Bryan all deserved to be used better as main eventers/champions yet Vince did not get behind them for varying reasons.Vince prefers marketable “wrestler looking” types rather than smaller, more athletic and exciting workers to be his “point man”, hence why John Cena and Roman have been given the nod.As fans age, they quickly tire of the spoonfed way WWE does things and this leads to the hate on Roman. In many ways it isn’t ACTUALLY about Roman, it’s about Vince and the way he pushes some talent and not others. If 5 years ago they’d started on the same path with Rusev, people would have hated it the same as Roman.Undertaker is a misnomer and again has no relevance in hate on Roman, fans should be hating that he was still wrestling at that point and not retired before it got to that stage of jobbing out to Roman rather than blaming Roman for it.
Do you feel sorry for Roman Reigns?
The crowd just won't give Roman a break. He works hard, he never misses a show, he does what he's told to do. I see the similarities between WWE(F) Champion Diesel and WWE Champion Roman Reigns, nobody liked Diesel as the top guy and it didn't work.