Scottish Premier League opening day: How did Rangers get on?
Am looking through the results and cannot find there's anywhere..... Also since when are Dundee in the Premier League?? Seriously though when are Rangers playing their first SPL game of the season? Trololololol! :D
Which is the worst English Premier League team for young players?
Premier league is not known to be ideal when It comes to nurturing and developing young players. A study by CIES FOOTBALL OBSERVATORY has shown that only 13.9% of the players currently playing for the club they represent were trained in the youth academy of their respective clubs.Which is very low while comparing with the top 5 leaguesBut this does not answer the question!!The question says the team worst for youth players.The team has to be Chelsea giving an unbiased opinion. Currently under Mourinho, the club's manager is not known to give youth players chance when he has got a gifted experienced side.Mohamed Salah can be an example.If not yet convinced one can easily name Romelu Lukaku, who has shown he is fit for the Premier League by being successful at the loan spells at the Premier League clubs.But he was shown the door by the management as they had acquired the Ex-Atletico Madrid superstar Diego Costa.Still it would remain debatable to find THE CLUB
Honest, Unbiased, Top 10 players in the league?
What is yours? Here is mine: 1. LeBron James 2. Kobe Bryant 3. Dwyane Wade 4. Dwight Howard 5. Chris Paul 6. Tim Duncan 7. Carmelo Anthony 8. Kevin Garnett 9. Dirk Nowitzki 10. Amare Stoudemire Notice I used to be extremely biased and have Dwight Howard, Chris Paul, and Dwyane Wade as the Top 3, and I would have Derrick Rose and Kevin Durant in there too. What is yours? Rate mine out of 100, please? BQ: Create a BQ and answer it for yourself.
What are the best teams to start your FIFA player career mode?
What ive found is that if you start with a mexican league team, you get loaned after 3 games.This is GREAT.Why?Because they send you to a lower league, where you are the best player. Right off the bat you can have more play time than those who were there before you. It's a playground to develop your player super fast.When i finished at Dundee FC we won the league and cup, my rating was at 78. When i returned to Toluca i finished the league, but transfered out.Why?My player grew to 84 and was signed to Wolfsburg. Which limited my growth, but offered more prestige. Winning the champions cup, Deutsche pokal, and some other cups along the way.Before i transfered out from Wolfsburg to Arsenal, i even won the World Cup for Mexico.Arsenal then bid for me and gave me 150k per week to my 90k. Now I'm trying to win this league and whatever cup comes after, hopefully i get scouted by Barcelona or Real Madrid.Though, for the prestige…update: im not sure if my other comment was posted, but yeah… i got scouted by real madrid. i wanted barcelona but they didnt make an offer.if you want a starting role in the mexican league instantly pick lobos buap team, theyre lowly rated and you will probably be able to get a starting position. i chose toluca, because im a fan.the mexican league is easy enough to grow, but competitive enough to be noticed. on a separate run i got scouted by dortmund and i stayed 2 years before playing for real madrid, i got offers for bayern and manchester united but i prefered dortmund.
Why is real maldrid not not top of it league even though they have all the world best player?
Football is a team game. Its need 100% team-effort to win a vital match. It is true that the world best players are playing for Real Madrid, but maximum of them are aged. They are now not as good as they had before four years. So the efficency of team is quite low than other renowned team like Barcilona, Villareal, Real Jaragoja, AC & Inter Milan, Juventas, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool, Man United, Benfica etc. Not only that, the ego problem is also ruin the team efforts of Real Madrid. The coach is unable to control those super stars. The Real Madrid Management have change their coach several times in recent past. I hope they will overcoma this problem and contract with some young star footballer like Henri, C. Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Kaka, Mesi, Balack, etc. in future.
How many more years until Liverpool can realistically challenge for the EPL again?
Depends on your definition of 'challenge', but if you mean having the fate of the title in their own hands towards the end of the season (like they had at the end of 2013-14 when they were two point clear on top with two matches to play), it's likely to take quite a few years.In 2013-14, Liverpool were playing very well, but they had two extra factors going for them: Suarez and no European football. Suarez won them points through his sheer skill the team wouldn't have otherwise been able to win, and not being in Europe made them that much fresher than their direct rivals. With Southampton flying high, they could feasibly miss European football in 2015-16 as well, but it does not look like they're going to have a player like Suarez again anytime soon.But it's not only about Liverpool. Like it or not, money runs the game more than ever before. The way Premier League has currently been set up, any season neither Chelsea nor Manchester City wins the title, both of those teams have failed. With the financial power they have, they should be dominating the league. And should they fail to do so, Manchester United and Arsenal are generally in a better position than Liverpool to take advantage. To put it bluntly, Arsenal (who are the weakest of the rivals) can afford one world-class player more each season than Liverpool.So, in short, the next time Liverpool will realistically challenge for the EPL title is the year when they are having a very good season, Chelsea and Manchester City have an off year, and Manchester United and Arsenal are struggling to make their mark, too.Disclaimer: I don't mean any disrespect towards Liverpool. I have very high regard for Brendan Rodgers and freely admit that he could be the ace that proves me wrong, and personally I'd prefer Liverpool winning the title over the Manchester Clubs or Chelsea. This is just how I see the big picture.
Which possible signings can Arsène Wenger make which could improve Arsenal's prospects for the next season?
Assuming he starts with the current 3–4–2–1 formation(but then again, it's Arsene Wenger), according to me the following signings would suffice:Kylian Mbappe/Alexandre Lacazette: Arsenal fans have been crying out for a top quality striker for years now, and hope has been presented in the form of a (rumored) €95 million bid for the hottest striker in Europe right now, Kylian Mbappe. The 18 year old has shown flashes of similarity with our greatest ever player Thierry Henry, and would be a great addition to a frontline of Alexis Sanchez and Mesut Ozil. In case the Mbappe bid falls through, a bid for Lacazette makes sense, as he has been scouted for years by Arsenal and Atletico Madrid’s transfer embargo has opened up on the possibility of him joining us.Riyad Mahrez: Another player perpetually linked to us, the Mahrez transfer makes sense, as it would allow Wenger to rotate between the narrower 3–4–2–1 to the more wider 3–4–3 with Alexis on the left and Mahrez on the right. Besides, the Europa League will put tremendous pressure on the squad and having a good depth is key.Corentin Tolisso: The perfect midfield partner for Granit Xhaka in my opinion. Tolisso is great defensively, contributes greatly in attack and is versatile, capable of filling in on the right wing back position. A case may be made for Aaron Ramsey, who has been rejuvenated by the change in formation, but I feel his injury problems are too much and it would be risky to play him week in week out. However, his price tag is a bit high.These are the signings which I think will transform us. I haven't given a goalkeeper because I feel bringing back Sczesczny is enough and we have good depth in defence.
Is Kerala Blasters FC a good team compared to other teams and can they win the ISL?
If you compare them with most other teams, I would probably say that the Kerala team is the weakest. Most teams have star players like Pires, Trezeguet, Capdevila, Anelka and Del Piero. Players who during their prime were some of the best in the world. The closest Kerala has to a former world class player is their player/manager David James. He has a lot of experience as a keeper in the Premier League and over 50 caps for England. He was a coach at Luton Town which means that this is not his first coaching venture either. WIth Sandeep Nandy as well in the squad, the GK position seems to be covered well. Lets move on to the outfield. The defense is also pretty good because Kerala has experienced players like Falvey and Hengbart and young domestic players like Nirmal Chettri and they have pretty good depth in defense. But what really worries me is the midfield. Forcada, Renedy Singh, Mehtab Hossain and Penn Orji will form the core of midfield but Kerala does not have enough depth or great quality in comparison to most other sides. The forward lineup is good with Michael Chopra and Ian Hume both players with considerable experience in English leagues. The other big advantage for Kerala is Trevor Morgan. He is a very capable Asst. Manager and knows the Indian football scene and conditions well unlike most other coaches. So, maybe on paper the team doesn't compare great with other teams. But there is a lot more to football than having star names. Coaches like Morgan make a huge difference, so does good team chemistry and adaptability to Indian conditions. This is why I feel that Kerala Blasters FC have as good or maybe a better chance to win the ISL than all the other franchises.