Are these sentences correct? ?
"We sightsaw in the mornings and then worked in the afternoons" and "Australia? It's climate's the best and it's got the best beaches" and "This one's much more easier"
Are these sentences correct?
im having trouble with simple subjects, i understand complete subjects but i wanted to make surei was correct 1. The Tour de France is probably the most famous bike race in the world. Complete subject:The Tour de France Simple subject: famous 2. The two-thousand-mile race lasts for almost one month. Complete subject: The two-thousand-mile race Simple subject: almost 3. Helping to cut wind resistance are the bikers' aerodynamic helmets Complete subject: Helping to cut wind resistance Simple subject: bikers 4. Specially designed bikes with low handlebars also help increase the racers' speeds. Complete subject: Specially designed bike Simple subject: racers 5. The Arc de Triomphe in Paris stands near the finish line. Complete subject: The Arc de Triomphe Simple subject: stands Are these correct??
Are these sentences correct?
Listening TO old songs often TAKES ME FOR a stroll down memory lane. She writes AS TO THE MANNER BORN. A Shakespearian phrase, from Hamlet. There was a British TV sitcom called "To the Manor Born" - a pun. Maybe people are familiar with that and are getting confused.
Are These Sentences Correct??
1. Our national parks offer a variety of settings-they attract millions of visitors every year. 2. The Grand Teton National Park includes a sixteen-peak mountain range, it offers extensive hiking trails and wildlife-viewing opportunities. 3. Yellowstone National Park is generally full of tourists and, the geysers and cliffs are worth the visit. 4. Hikers especially enjoy their vacations at Yellowstone National Park because the park consists of two million acres of backcountry, perfect for hiking. 5. Vacationers enchanted by cascading water should visit Yosemite National Park because the waterfalls at Yosemite reach heights of more than two thousand feet. .....Where would you put a semicolon or colon....join them with a coordination conjunct...reduce one to a phrase or dependent clause,,,,or itegrate one clause into the other.....HELP!
Are these sentence correct?
The sentences are correct, but believe it or not, some are more correct than others. They DO NOT have the same meaning. 1 and 2 are both correct, and could have the same meaning, but may not. The first one is "elliptical," which means that some of the words have been left out, but you can infer what is meant. The missing words could be several possibilities: repairs which were carried out; repairs which have been carried out; repairs which are carried out; are being carried out. Since you don't know which auxiliary verb form is missing, so can't say with certainty what the tense is. But they are both correct. 2 and 3 might seem to mean the same thing, but they don't. In #2, the repairs are done on a frequent or regular basis, ongoingly on the motorway, and therefore delays could be expected. But in #3, the repairs are being carried out on the motorway at the present moment, or at the present time. There is no indication that repairs are made on the motorway on an ongoing basis. Since repairs are occurring now, and that is unusual, delays would be expected. The sentence is grammatically allowable. 4 - is referring to repairs which were carried out on the motorway, and now they are finished. The implication is that something about the repairs themselves may result in traffic delays. The sentence conforms to grammatical conventions. 5 - In the last one, the repairs were being carried out recently, but for a finite period of time. This one is questionable as pertains to correctness. The repairs were carried out and now they are done. How could they delay traffic? This is another one where the repairs or resultant condition of the road become the problem for traffic.
Which one of these sentences is correct?
Grammatically speaking, both are correct.The first one is in direct speech and should be punctuated accordingly."How could I have forgotten about that?", he thought. It was the most important detail of the mission. Something that a soldier of his caliber had to remember.The second one is supposedly in indirect speech. It needs a few rearrangements.How he could have forgotten about that, he thought. It was the most important detail of the mission. Something that a soldier of his caliber had to remember.I don't know what you mean by just. But if you are narrating the story using dialogues, the first one would be better. Nonetheless, the first one seems to be an appropriate and clear grammatical construct.
Are these sentences correct or not?
Using the word condolences in the letter is a bit difficult and awkward. It doesn't really say anything or express your gratitude for their condolences anyway. How about something like this instead: Dear __________, Thank you so much for sending me a card when my father died. It means a lot that you were thinking of me at such a sad time. Your heartfelt condolences were very much appreciated. Sincerely, _________ You can change the word card, to letter, or note, or flowers depending on what they sent you. Just keep it simple.
Are these sentences nature and correct?
The Son of King Shall be the death with his body torn apart. So Shall His father,The Current king be with his dead hung. So Shall The Queen be with her head cut off.